UMA Talks 2011-2012
If you'd like to suggest a speaker or a topic for a lecture, email us!
Abstracts for UMA talks from previous years may be found here:
2003-2004,
2004-2005,
2005-2006,
2006-2007,
2007-2008, and
2008-2009.
Fall 2011
| Date |
Speaker |
Title |
| 13 September 2011 |
Prof. Abhinav Kumar |
Spherical Codes and Linear Programming Bounds
Abstract: How many points can be placed on a sphere in n dimensions,
which are all separated by at least some given distance?
This classical problem in discrete geometry involves some beautiful
configurations. Professor Kumar will describe a few of these, and also
talk about upper bounds for the number of points, which come from linear
programming bound and use some representation theory/harmonic analysis.
In particular, for some of the more remarkable configurations, we get sharp
bounds which prove that they are optimal and even unique. If time permits,
Professor Kumar will also talk about similar bounds for potential energy (Thomson's problem). |
| 20 September 2011 |
Prof. Scott Sherffield |
How to Share with Gallants and Boors: A Fun Game Theoretic Puzzle
Abstract: Imagine you and a partner sit at a table with k distinct morsels of food (sushi rolls, say) of different types.
You take turns selecting morsels until all are eaten.
If you and your friend each get different amounts of enjoyment from each different type of food (and these values are commonly known),
how will you make your selections if your only goal is to maximize your own enjoyment?
What if your only goal is to maximise the enjoyment of your partner?
What if there are multiple people, perhaps a mix of greedy and short-sighted souls (boors) and strategists obsessed with the enjoyment of others (gallants),
and you know who is who?
It turns out that the optimal strategies have a rather nice form. Can you figure it out before talk? |
| 27 September 2011 |
Prof. Scott Aaronson |
The Permanent and the Determinant:
The Amazing Role of Two Deceptively-Simple Functions, in Everything From Quantum Mechanics to the P=?NP Problem
Abstract: Given an n-by-n matrix, two of the most natural quantities
to consider are its permanent and its determinant. But despite the
similarity of their definitions, it's been known for decades that
these functions differ dramatically in their computational properties:
the permanent is #P-complete (i.e., "even harder than NP-complete"),
whereas the determinant is computable in polynomial time. In this
talk, I'll tell an interconnected story about this pair of functions,
touching briefly on some subset of the following (depending on
audience interest):
-- Why these functions play central roles in Geometric Complexity
Theory, Ketan Mulmuley's approach to the P=?NP problem based on
algebraic geometry and representation theory
-- The two basic types of particle in the universe (bosons and
fermions), and how their differences arise from differences between
the permanent and determinant functions
-- A result of Valiant that free fermion systems can be efficiently
simulated by a classical computer, basically because the determinant
is in P
-- A recent result of myself and Arkhipov showing that free boson
systems probably CAN'T be efficiently simulated by a classical
computer, basically because the permanent is #P-complete
-- How I recently used the connection with bosons to give a new proof
that the permanent is #P-complete
-- The distribution of the determinants of Gaussian random matrices,
and a corresponding open problem for the permanents (Terry Tao
couldn't solve this problem, but hopefully one of you can!) |
| 4 October 2011 |
Prof. James Munkres |
What Are Manifolds and Why Do We Study Them?
|
| 18 October 2011 |
Dr. Tanya Khovanova |
The Jewish Problem
Abstract: She will explain how mathematics was used to discriminate against Jewish
people at the entrance exams to the math department of Moscow State
University thirty years ago. Many problems had a simple solution that
was difficult to find. Such problems protected the administration from
extra complaints and appeals.
She will give an historical background and discuss a lot of tricky problems
that were referred to as "Jewish" or "Coffin" problems.
If you want to prepare for the talk, try to formulate in two words the
main idea behind a simple solution to the following problem:
Find all functions F (x) : R --> R having the property that for
any x1 and x2 the following inequality holds:
F (x1) - F (x2) < =(x1 - x2)^2 |
Spring 2012
| Date |
Speaker |
Title |
| 14 February 2012 |
Prof. Richard Stanley |
Pick's Theorem and Beyond
Enumerating lattice points in polytopes |
| 28 February 2012 |
Prof. Jacob Fox |
Ramsey Numbers
Abstract: Ramsey theory refers to a large body of deep results in
mathematics which show that "complete disorder is impossible". I will
describe some of the fundamental problems and results in this area, and the
recent solution by David Conlon, Benny Sudakov, and myself of an old
problem of Paul Erdos on the distribution of monochromatic cliques in
2-edge-colorings of complete graphs. |
| 13 March 2012 |
Yufei Zhao |
Extremal Graph Theory
Abstract: This talk will be an introduction to extremal graph theory,
a field of mathematics dealing with questions such as, which
triangle-free graph on n vertices has the most edges? I will
talk about some classical results such as Turan's theorem and
their applications to other areas of mathematics. Extremal graph
theory is an active research area with many open problems.
No background will be assumed for the talk. |
|