UROP
Evaluations
We require
two separate
evaluations
at the end
of each term/summer of UROP participation;
one from you and
one from your
faculty supervisor.
These evaluations
are due even
when you are
continuing
the same UROP and
are expected
whether your
project was
done on a
credit, pay,
or volunteer
basis. Evaluations
need not be
lengthy if
you are continuing,
but should
provide us
with enough
information
to keep us
up to date.
Evaluations are an invaluable
means for UROP staff
to find out how UROP is
working. We use evaluations
to guide our support of
UROP students and faculty
supervisors as well as to gather
feedback about the program.
N.B. No
proposal will
be reviewed
until evaluations
from the previous
UROP have
been submitted
to UROP
staff.
Student
Evaluations
Your evaluation
should describe
your personal
and technical
progress during
the past semester.
Let us know
about the
successes
and challenges
of your UROP
research,
the impact
of your UROP
experience
on your undergraduate
career, or
any general
comments about
UROP.
If you have published or
coauthored any papers for
publication as a result
of your research collaboration,
the UROP Office would like
to receive a copy.
Faculty
Supervisor
Evaluations
Your UROP
supervisor
should assess
your progress.
We want him
or her to
tell us about
your contributions
to the research
group and
what your
work habits
were like.
Would your
supervisor
recommend
you for UROP
financial
support or
for work on
other UROP
projects?
We also invite
general comments
about the
program. |
