|
|
Successful nominations should include examples to describe contributions
that clearly relate to supporting the Institutes and/or DLC's mission.
Nominators are requested to consider and to describe how a nominee's contributions
meet that criteria.
Following is a list of attributes and accomplishments that describe an
Infinite Mile Award nominee. Nominations should include examples of how
the nominee meets these criteria.
-
Exhibits professionalism. The individual exhibits a
positive outlook and attitude toward his or her job (e.g., industriousness,
self-motivation, persistence). The individual consistently provides
a high level of service while showing respect and courtesy to others. Helpful hints
-
Demonstrates initiative and innovation in carrying out her/his
job. Applies to administrative and non-technical matters as
well as to research-related programs. Helpful hints
-
Leads or leads by example. Effectively collaborates
with others (locally and/or across the Institute) to produce a result. Helpful hints
-
Serves the greater good. Results and outcome of individual’s
work reflects positively on the Institute, enhances morale, makes
MIT a better place to work, etc. Helpful hints
-
Influences others. The individual goes about the routines
of her/his job, day in and day out, with a remarkable attitude and
enthusiasm that influences and benefits others. Helpful hints >Helpful
hints
Here are examples of more specific achievements or contributions of an
appropriate Infinite Mile nominee. Usually, nominations should reflect
a pattern of accomplishment rather than a single contribution.
-
Developed procedures or systems to reduce work
-
Took on extra work assignments without formal recognition, to support
goals, accomplish objectives
-
Did something(s) to significantly impact/improve departmental morale
-
Took on an unofficial mentoring role to teach or train others
-
Identified need(s) and initiated appropriate projects or procedures
to address them
Each nomination will be considered on its own merits. An accurate, persuasive
and well-documented justification which provides examples of how the nominee
meets the above criteria is an essential part of the nomination and selection
processes. |
|