The Net Advance of Physics: The Nature of Dark Matter, by Kim Griest -- Introduction
Next: Physical Evidence
Up: Abstract
Previous: Abstract
The dark matter problem has been around for decades, and there is
now consensus that we don't know what the most common material
in the Universe is [1]. It is ``seen" only gravitationally, and does not
seem to emit or absorb substantial electromagnetic radiation at any
known wavelength. It dominates the gravitational potential on
scales from tiny dwarf galaxies, to large spiral galaxies like
the Milky Way, to large clusters of galaxies, to the largest scales yet
explored. The universal average density of dark matter determines
the ultimate fate of the Universe, and it is clear that the amount
and nature of dark matter stands as one of the major unsolved
puzzles in science.
In this review I will first briefly recall the evidence for
dark matter,
with emphasis on the dark matter in our own Galaxy. I then turn to
the dark matter candidates and how we might discover which (if
any) of them actually exist. Then, I will focus in on two of my
favorite candidates, the supersymmetric neutralino Wimp
candidate, and the baryonic Macho candidate. For the latter
candidate, I will go into some detail concerning the one particular
experiment with which I am involved, and present some results
showing, that over a broad range of masses, this candidate has been
ruled out as the primary constituent of the dark matter in our
Galaxy. In my discussion of the supersymmetric Wimp, and
especially in discussing the neutrino and axion candidates, I will be
brief.
Introduction