Notes from September 29, 2004
Stakeholders in
Preservation/Conservation
Fishermen
- Preserve fish as a resource
- Maximize take
- No restrictions/quota (will decrease
take & make life harder)
Scientists
- Preserve natural laboratory
- Balance between human and non-human
concerns
- No restrictions on research
Tourists
- Want to visit
- Comforts of home
- Affordability
- Full access
- Take home souvenirs
- Interact with animals
- Thrill & aesthetics
Park rangers
- Obey laws for easier job
- Higher wages (indicate they are valued)
- Educate tourists
- Safety
- Preserve environment
- Consistency in policy
- Minimal interference (autonomy)
Ecuadorian government
- Money
- Control
- Political opportunity
- Preserve environment
- Maintain good international relations
Non-fishing inhabitants
- Better standard of living
- Promote tourism
- Special status (no restrictions on food
& water)
- Keep their homes
- Transportation (improve island autonomy
& infrastructure)
- Political stability
Tourism industry
- Money
- Aesthetics
- Happy clientele
- More clients
- Proper cost-benefit ratio
- Provide what tourists want
- Lower their costs
NGOs (Non-governmental organizations)
- Preservation
- Worthy investment
- Marketable product
- Influence
- Perception
GOs (Government organizations)
- Preserve trade relations
- Self-interest of their citizens
- Influence