2.744
Human-use Analysis Reviews
Home > Assignments > Human-use analysis results > Reviews for Or Oppenheimer

Or Oppenheimer
spiro
[review]

 Analysis RatingsPresentation Ratings
Average Rating
 
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Reviewer 4:
1-marginal     2-ok    3-good     4-very good    5-outstanding

Quality and thoroughness of human-use analysis and improvement suggestions

Reviewer 1:

The explanation of the game mechanics and community is very clear and easy to follow, and you address most of the problems in your suggestions. However, I would have wanted to see some visual component to how your suggestions might be implemented. What might a filter look like in-game? I would have also loved to see how some of your suggestions might have been received by current players.

return to top of page


Reviewer 2:

The user experience analysis was quite thorough and well explored. Good job in identifying different aspects that the users enjoyed and dislike. Very good suggestions and description on how to improve the user experience of the system. Apart from the conceptual ideas regarding the solutions for the system, it would be nice to have some visual examples on how would you integrate some of the new features into the app.

return to top of page


Reviewer 3:

Or's analysis of Pokemon Go is thorough, engaging, and well presented. The images of different users and the user feedback was especially well put together. Having a description of the game mechanics at the beginning was also very helpful. One aspect I would have liked to know more about is the original intent of the game designers and if the user experience matches those goals. It would have also been nice to have some concept sketches or images for the solutions page. Overall, very well done!

return to top of page


Reviewer 4:

The write-up was very thorough. Even someone who has not heard of the game before can pick up on the general gameplay and begin to understand why the frustrations are an issue. Nice job in incorporating the community aspect which is one of the biggest draws of the game.

return to top of page



Clarity and presentation of human-use experience analysis

Reviewer 1:

Nice website! The only thing missing from your presentation is the visual component for your improvement suggestions. It would be great if you could mock up what the new UI might look like.

return to top of page


Reviewer 2:

The website format, visuals and content were very well presented. Both the content and layout were easy to follow; and the design of the website was aesthetically pleasant.

return to top of page


Reviewer 3:

The website is a great interface. It is elegant and easy to use The minimal color scheme works well in contrast with the very colorful images. Nice work!

return to top of page


Reviewer 4:

The layout of the website was set up nicely. I like how the problem and solutions page were both organized. There was a nice parallel between the two which served to acknowledge the problem and how solve it. The use of pictures made it very easy to understand concepts for individuals not too familiar with the game. A note however is that Conclusion is mislabeled a Introduction.

return to top of page