53 Model The model is based on Quaise’s preliminary study of the feasibility of powering MIT’s CUP with deep geothermal energy. We consider 3 scenarios: no use of deep geothermal energy, full use of deep geothermal energy as proposed by Quaise (full phase-out of fossil fuels at the CUP and full supply of heat and electricity through deep geothermal), partial use of deep geothermal energy (supply half of the heat and electricity through deep geothermal). Note that the model currently does not account for growth in electricity demand (as the CUP currently supplies 44MWelectric and 320,000lb/hr of steam). Key Recommendations While the technology-readiness of deep geothermal is low – with Quaise stating it likely will not be operational before 2040 – MIT should start discussions with the city related to permitting and siting of wellfields, and should consider carrying out extensive geological explorations. These steps will be crucial in gaining clarity as to whether or not to pursue deep geothermal is advisable and in ensuring that the technology can be deployed rapidly if so. Moreover, it will provide MIT with internal knowledge and partnerships that could be applicable to other decarbonization strategies and technologies.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjA2MzQ5MA==