Category G: Great power and allied involvement
Phase 3 Factors
| 3G-01 | Strong superpower diplomatic support to "status quo" side |
| 3G-02 | Strong superpower diplomatic support to "non-status quo" side |
| 3G-03 | A superpower appears to be neutral |
| 3G-04 | A superpower fears growth of conflict into a wider war |
| 3G-05 | The prestige of a superpower is committed to settlement |
| 3G-06 | Major powers supply arms and equipment to "status quo" side to redress imbalance |
| 3G-07 | Major powers supply arms and equipment to "non-status quo" side to redress imbalance |
| 3G-08 | Arrival of arms in one side raises the prospect of a wider war |
| 3G-09 | Great power interest in the area increases |
| 3G-10 | A great power's diplomatic support encourages one side to continue the struggle |
| 3G-11 | Great power gives "status quo" side substantial economic aid |
| 3G-12 | Great power gives "non-status quo" side substantial economic aid |
| 3G-13 | Great power supporter of "status quo" side contemplates intervention |
| 3G-14 | Great power supporter of "non-status quo" side contemplates intervention |
| 3G-15 | A great power urges one side to avoid provoking a full-scale war |
| 3G-16 | A great power indicates interest in terminating hostilities and negotiating a settlement |
| 3G-17 | Great powers urge cease fire and avoidance of intensification |
| 3G-18 | Great powers/superpowers are losing interest in the conflict |
| 3G-19 | One great power/superpower becomes active mediator |
| 3G-20 | A previously supportive great power/superpower drops out |
| 3G-21 | Great powers/superpowers collaborate to resolve conflict |
| 3G-22 | Regional powers want a peaceful settlement |
| 3G-23 | Great power supporter of "non-status quo" side refuses to assure aid |
| 3G-24 | Great power supporter of "status quo" side refuses to assure aid |
Copyright © 1999 Lincoln P. Bloomfield and Allen Moulton