To: cease@MIT.EDU
Cc: ganderso@MIT.EDU
Subject: Notes from our 10/15/99 meeting
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 09:29:51 -0400
From: "Naomi B. Schmidt" <nschmidt@MIT.EDU>


Attending were Bob Basch, Abby, Bill, and Naomi

Agenda
------

- faculty responses to Naomi's questionnaire
- 3partysw license logs
- news from SGI
- other data 
- renewal scenarios over the next few years

1.  Faculty responses

Naomi sent out a questionnaire to 30 faculty/TAs/administrators
asking about course use of SGI's and anticipated effects of our
phasing out of this platform in the public clusters.  Replies have
been received from about 1/3 of them.  Chemical Engineering and
6.035 (compiler course) seem the most upset about the prospect of
losing SGI's in the clusters.  Naomi will summarize the responses
for next week's meeting.

2.  Abby presented 3partysw logs from license servers.  MSI didn't
seem to get that much use by undergraduates in Sept.  We'll check
again at the end of Oct.

3.  Bill reported that MSI reports their future direction to be a
client application that talks to an application server.  We
probably willneed to address the MSI problem to support those
departments that depend heavily on it in any case, as the company
moves away from the MIPS client platform over the next few years.

Re news from SGI, the 4 GB O2 doesn't exist anymore and they're
now shipping 9 GB machines.  We will be getting a loaner to try it
out.

Source code that we received from SGI doesn't contain any of the X
stuff, and that poses problems for us.

Bill has not received a reply re SGI's long term strategy from
Eileen.  He also sent off that question to *** Brown.  It appears
that the follow-on to the O2 will be their Intel LInux desktop
machine.  W/in the next 12 to 18 months, they will have a 400 MHz
machine in the R5000 series.  IRIX will become the platform for
their application servers - they're staying with MIPS for their
high end machines.

Questions that we need to answer in reaching our recommendations:

- Is there value to buying some/more/less/any SGI's in FY2001?

- What are the pros and cons of reducing the total number of SGI's
in clusters?  for Cluster Group?  for OLC? for Ops? for Dev? for
Depts?

We know that over a 4 year timeframe, the IRIX single user desktop
will disappear.  In FY2002 - 2003, SGI is not going to want to
sell us O2s.  What do we do in FY2001 is the big question.

Our next meeting will be Friday, Oct 22.  Naomi will bring
information re faculty responses to the questionnaire.
 
