CRITIQUE ARCHIVE

HOME   SYLLABUS

http://www.sputnik7.com

By James Decker

Integrity isn't the most likely idea to come away with after taking the grand tour of the new broadband networks. But that's the idea I'm stuck on. Which kind of integrity do I mean? Structural, personal, design integrity? Let's see, structural integrity might include questions like: "Will the banner ad crash, stranding me in the middle of Tom Tomorrow's This Modern World episode? Well, that might afford some ironic subtext. I can handle that. Or, could the Real Audio, Quicktime, Windows Media Player war happen in some way other than by tugging at my trouser legs? I mean, choices I have no meaningful basis to decide aren't really choices. I don't think it is structural integrity I'm stuck on. Maybe it's Design integrity I'm thinking about. After all that's what pulled me into www.sputnik7.com just twenty-four hours after my home DSL connection went live. I chose to give sputnik7 a closer look for this review, but three months ago I found sputnik7 while brushing up on bands at www.BrainWashed.com. That's where I saw a feature on Jack Danger's new album. Jack is also known as Meat Beat Manifesto and his new album was going to be a pure play release, a sputnik7 exclusive. I clicked. I remember thinking about the URLs trace reference to communist technology and then my screen started to bleed a revolutionary red, crisscrossed with shifty little scan lines. So, I'm ready for the subversive, radical, pirate radio, out-from-under-the-boot-heel, post-capitalism experience. Instead, the metaphor gets mixed, suddenly I'm watching a survival-of-the-fittest sperm count pun. Still, it was some of the slickest Flash I'd seen over the net (in my first 24 hours). I wanted for sputnik7 to be a rich site. I really did. I went straight to Jack Danger, wheezed at the price tag and groaned at the poor video and audio quality of the limited sample. Still, the most expensive music is sometimes the very best. My brain told me, "You're shopping now." And I knew it was true, but I decided to take a look around just to see who Jack Danger consorts with on the Web. I had to shift gears to see that yes, the features were interesting but the design had crashed, I was stranded wondering, "What's the connection? What's the story here?"

Cookie cutter reviews and the feeling of being tricked when menus that promise content instead deliver clips and trailers, that's the connection. Sales and content were one and the same. That's what held the site together, that was its integrity. So, if you're almost famous when sputnik7 invites you to submit your band's demo for possible reposting in the "Free Downloads" section… (which really just links to your band's own site), the circle will be complete. Seller will have met seller. For the infamous, we are invited to select our favorite video and wait for it to play shoutcast style to other "viewers". Yes, the feeling of sputnik7 is unmistakably that of a centrally managed store. My mistake was expecting that a site that with exclusive ties to Jack Danger held some particular interest in the music; it promised some narrative of music sensibility, a history maybe… I was picturing a person behind sputnik7. Maybe, when I said integrity I really meant voice, I sought contact with a person's ideas. It made me think how, for better or worse, television came into its own by creating more than a learnable visual rhetoric, it relied on a cast of characters, the voices and personae of people. The Web doesn't need to emulate the evolution of television, in fact it had better not because we already have television and television will soon offer its own interactivity. ITV will try to corner and contain the current consumer market with it's buy/sell logic intact. We can look forward to corporations, politicians, and civilians all advertising to each other. Self help will likely flourish as we even learn to advertise to ourselves.

So what might be the logical difference, the idea that is integral to Web content that sustains content by getting people paid? With the ability to simulate three dimensional spaces, semi-intelligent agents, synchronous and asynchronous discussion, the model may draw more from storefronts spaces. Don't think mall, please, think of our grandparents' generation. Back rooms perhaps where special deals can be made, except these back rooms secret virtual waterfalls, try a free taste of this, or you should meet my friend. Would these be real or simulated conversations? Software agents or real time conversations with knowledgeable people? Both. But, a shop that empowers its employees to make deals, work on commission, keep the client in the seat, might just energize transactions and create a kind of culture. Culture being that thing that brands came to simulate, you remember. In short, the content at sputnik7 doesn't fit together. Broadband is awfully new, but I'm hoping the convergence of video, audio, text, animation, and synchronous communication will amount to a convergence of learning and play, socializing and politics, sensibility and sales. Kind of like it's always been.