CRITIQUE ARCHIVE

HOME   SYLLABUS

http://www.streaming.com/

By Margaret Wong

Audio is not the only media being streamed across the World Wide Web these days. Plenty of sites boasts real time streaming video of important events such as the news broadcast of the presidential race, music concerts, private weddings, and even the MIT net carried a live stream of its June 2000 commencement. The need for streaming media is the foundation for sites like www.streaming.com. Though in its current "under construction" state of faulty database retrievals and broken message posting boards, it does have potential for advancement.

www.streaming.com appeals to businesses as well as private users. From providing streaming training sessions to broadcasting reunions, they are harping on the emergence of DSL and other broadband technology to take the world by storm. Without such high-speed connections, the entire company would fall to ruins. As streaming video is very much limited by the advancement of technology, the timing of this company's entrance onto the market is crucial. Targeting U.S. customer is a risky move, since European and Asian broadband markets are more advanced. The wireless videophone in Japan has already become a reality and its use has already been employed in society. In the U.S. wired broadband has been slow to take off, much less in wireless forms.

Assuming the high-speed connections will be in place by the time this company reaches its full functionality, the site would not necessarily be successful. Unlike the onset of streaming audio, streaming video might not generate as much popularity. The interrelations of society can sway either way with this technology. At the current promotion of commercial uses, it will not succeed. Big corporations might employ this company but it is unlikely due to the fact that they already have better video conferencing equipment that overshadow simple video streaming. A change must happen for this idea to take off. They must appeal to the individual user.

As an individual user the private uses of video streaming will be appealing if the video streaming is to replace the Internet phone. Web cameras are becoming more popular in the homes already. Free software such as NetMeeting and CUSeeMe already support such video streaming but at slow rates. The only advantage www.streaming.com has over these tools is to provide faster service or multi-user conferencing with virtual spaces as chatrooms. When broadband arrives in every home, it is not certain that www.streaming.com will provide better service than the free video conferencing softwares. It has yet to find the necessary appeal with its potential audience.

From the current situation video streaming will not take society by storm and most likely will not alter the social norms of communication. However it is not totally out of the realm of possibilities. www.streaming.com has a shot at changing the face of communication, they just have to alter the angle of their approach a little more toward the personal interactions each user will have of the system, instead of passive media consumption no different than that of static television. Interaction and personalization is key and if they can achieve a true feel of personal "virtual" space on the web, another society will emerge to take the place of the current.