The following article was a Comment in The Sunday Mail newspaper in Zimbabwe 
February 4 1996.  I thought it might be of interest.  This was written soon
after the film was confiscated by the Government.  "The Flame" will be
Zimbabwe's 4th or 5th feature film when it is released later this year.
 (Opinions expressed are of the author)
          The Wrong Flame
               One of the biggest historical processes in Africa which
          some forces in our society and elsewhere would rather have
          undone and forgotten is the epic struggle waged by the people of
          this region for their emancipation.  Yet we must keep telling the
          story as it was, because if we do not, activists other than
          ourselves will tell it in line with their own value judgments,
          prejudices, and psychological outlook, hostile to the interest of
          the majority.  There are those who have already begun this re-
          writing of history in the name of "freedom of expression," in the
          name of "art" and "free flow of information".  They are in this
          connection embarking on a campaign of distortion.
               The bare facts regarding the liberation struggle in this
          region in general and Zimbabwe in particular are that all the
          pillaging and raping was done by the colonial regimes' security
          forces and their agents.  In Zimbabwe in particular it was the
          Selous scouts of all races who did all the raping and mass
          murders.  From one corner of the country they unleashed a reign
          of terror that transformed the peasants and men and women in
          the streets into nomads who would not know what next would
          befall them from a daily pattern of a life characterized by
          extreme violence and sudden death.
               As the years have gone by and because we were late in
          telling our own side of the story in film, along comes someone
          with the bright idea to inflame the wrong passions and tell the
          wrong story about the liberation movement through a film
          entitled Flame.  It is a work of monumental distortion if ever
          there was any but now being dubbed a work of art, by some
          fundis in the film industry in the West whose themes have
          played so much havoc with the minds of both the young and the
          old, more so in Africa than anywhere else.  Remember Tarzan!
               The liberation struggle involved the entire country and its
          black population.  The big story is about how the poor peasants
          were able to stand up to the might and terrorism of the racist
          minority regime.  The big story is about is about how these poor
          and unarmed people were able to accept and put their faith in
          the art of protracted warfare and then co-operated for years with
          the freedom fighters in the face of brutal intimidation and
          ruthless oppression.  But now what do we have?
               Quite a handful one would say.  Sinclair and Bright make
          Flame, a film which isolates two female combatants facing the
          ordeal of being raped by their male counterparts.  And this is the
          story that should go throughout the world to contribute to art in
          cinema and "enlighten" the public about the "realities" of the
          liberation struggle in Zimbabwe.
               It is said originally it was argued that there was no
          money to tell the story from our point of view in film.  That is
          probably understandable.  Then it is also said that it was argued
          that telling the story from our side in film and showing all the
          atrocities committed by the Smith Regime, could have harmed
          the spirit of reconciliation.  That reasoning does not look so
          good now in the face of Flame.
               It is important that as the nation gears up for the
          forthcoming Presidential election, it be made clear that such
          propaganda material is a work of sabotage  designed to tarnish
          the image of the liberation movement and its central role in the
          death of Rhodesia and the birth of Zimbabwe.
               There is nothing subtle about Flame.  It is meant to
          justify the racist belief that the freedom fighters were
terrorists,
          just as Ian Smith continues to call them this day.  At least the
          man says openly what he believes.  It is the nauseating
          hypocrites, who proclaim in the world that they are a different
          lot, yet think like him, find other ways of propagating his
          message and sometimes vote with him for the same political
          parties come election time - it is such elements, we say, that are
          more dangerous than Smith.  The story about the liberation
          struggle in film should be told by us.
In-Reply-To: 199604042138.QAA02267@dag.XC.Org