|
Families |
Groups |
Endline |
Midline |
Hypotheses |
Endline |
Midline |
||||
|
Access to Utilities, Services & Infrastructure |
Utilities |
№ |
ллл |
№ |
лл |
Access to Clean Drinking Water |
№ |
лл |
№ |
лл |
|
Access to Electricity |
№ |
лл |
∙ |
|
||||||
|
Services |
№ |
ллл |
№ |
л |
Access to Counseling Services for Women |
№ |
ллл |
№ |
ллл |
|
|
Access to Education |
№ |
лл |
- |
|||||||
|
Health Outcomes and Availability of Health Services |
№ |
лл |
∙ |
|
||||||
|
Infrastructure |
∙ |
|
∙ |
|
Access to Irrigation |
∙ |
|
- |
||
|
Village Accessibility and Villager Mobility |
∙ |
|
∙ |
|
||||||
|
Development Needs |
№ |
л |
∙ |
|
Fulfillment of Development Needs |
№ |
л |
∙ |
|
|
|
Economic Activity |
Perceptions |
№ |
ллл |
№ |
ллл |
Perceptions of Local Economic Improvement |
№ |
ллл |
№ |
ллл |
|
Stocks & Flows |
∙ |
|
№ |
лл |
Security of Household Income |
∙ |
|
№ |
л |
|
|
Household Consumption Expenditure |
∙ |
|
∙ |
|
||||||
|
Household Assets |
∙ |
|
∙ |
|
||||||
|
Borrowing for Food and Medical Needs |
∙ |
|
∙ |
|
||||||
|
Food Security |
∙ |
|
∙ |
|
||||||
|
Production & Marketing |
∙ |
|
∙ |
|
Agricultural Productivity and Access to Markets |
∙ |
|
∙ |
|
|
|
Non-Agricultural Productivity and Access to Markets |
∙ |
|
∙ |
|
||||||
|
Migration |
∙ |
|
№ |
ллл |
Net Migration of Households |
№ |
л |
№ |
лл |
|
|
Net Migration of Household Members |
∙ |
|
- |
|||||||
|
Local Governance |
Structure |
№ |
ллл |
№ |
ллл |
Turnover in Village Leadership |
∙ |
|
∙ |
|
|
Affiliation of Local Leaders with Representative Assemblies |
∙ |
|
№ |
ллл |
||||||
|
Female Representation in Local Assemblies |
№ |
ллл |
№ |
ллл |
||||||
|
Function |
№ |
лл |
№ |
ллл |
Provision of Local Governance Services |
∙ |
|
№ |
л |
|
|
Local Governance Activity of Leaders and Institutions |
№ |
лл |
№ |
ллл |
||||||
|
Role of Representative Assemblies in Local Governance |
∙ |
|
№ |
ллл |
||||||
|
Quality & Participation |
∙ |
|
№ |
ллл |
Participation of Villagers in Local Governance |
№ |
ллл |
№ |
ллл |
|
|
Perceptions of Local Governance Quality |
√ |
лл |
∙ |
|
||||||
|
Informal Taxation of Villagers by Local Leaders |
∙ |
|
- |
|||||||
|
Preference for Assembly Involvement in Local Governance |
∙ |
|
№ |
лл |
||||||
|
Political Attitudes & State-Building |
Democratic Values |
№ |
ллл |
№ |
ллл |
Acceptance of Democratic Norms of Governance |
№ |
л |
№ |
ллл |
|
Participation in Parliamentary Elections / Knowledge of Parliament |
№ |
лл |
∙ |
|
||||||
|
State Legitimacy |
№ |
лл |
№ |
ллл |
Acceptance of Central Governance Authority |
№ |
л |
∙ |
|
|
|
Linkages between Village and Government |
∙ |
|
№ |
ллл |
||||||
|
Perceptions of Government |
№ |
лл |
№ |
ллл |
Perceptions of Central Government |
№ |
л |
№ |
ллл |
|
|
Perceptions of Sub-National Government |
∙ |
|
№ |
ллл |
||||||
|
Perceptions of Allied Actors |
∙ |
|
№ |
ллл |
||||||
|
Conflict |
∙ |
|
№ |
л |
Violent Incidents |
∙ |
|
∙ |
|
|
|
Informal Taxation by Insurgent Groups |
∙ |
|
- |
|||||||
|
Perceptions of Local Security |
∙ |
|
№ |
лл |
||||||
|
Social Norms |
Social Cohesion |
∙ |
|
∙ |
|
Intra-Village Disputes and Resolution Rates |
∙ |
|
√ |
лл |
|
Interpersonal Trust |
∙ |
|
№ |
лл |
||||||
|
Basic Skills |
∙ |
|
№ |
ллл |
Literacy and Computational Ability |
∙ |
|
№ |
ллл |
|
|
Happiness |
№ |
л |
∙ |
|
Happiness |
№ |
л |
∙ |
|
|
|
Gender Attitudes |
№ |
ллл |
№ |
ллл |
Acceptance of Female Political Participation |
№ |
ллл |
∙ |
|
|
|
Acceptance of Female Economic and Social Participation |
№ |
лл |
∙ |
|
||||||
|
Cultural Constraints on Education of Girls |
∙ |
|
∙ |
|
||||||
|
Acceptance of Female Participation in Local Governance |
№ |
ллл |
№ |
лл |
||||||
|
Gender Outcomes |
№ |
лл |
№ |
ллл |
Female Involvement in Local Governance |
№ |
ллл |
№ |
ллл |
|
|
Social Activity among Women |
∙ |
|
∙ |
|
||||||
|
Female Mobility |
∙ |
|
№ |
ллл |
||||||
|
Female Participation in Economic Activity and Household Decision-Making |
∙ |
|
∙ |
|
||||||
|
Note: № denotes beneficial impacts; √ adverse impacts; ∙ no evidence of impact; and Ц no data. ллл denotes statistical significance at 1 percent level; лл statistical significance at 5 percent level; and л statistical significance at 10 percent level. Grey shading (л) denotes a loss of a level of statistical significance if baseline values are controlled for. Blue and dark red shading (л,л) denotes a gain of statistical significance (for beneficial and adverse impacts, respectively) if baseline values are controlled for. |
||||||||||