In the sequel we assume , and without loss of generality. According to this assumption the surface is a hyperbolic paraboloid when , an elliptic paraboloid when , a paraboloid of revolution when , and a parabolic cylinder when as illustrated in Fig. 8.9. The paraboloid of revolution and the parabolic cylinder can be considered as degenerate cases of the elliptic paraboloid. When , the principal direction is not defined and the point will become an umbilic. If and vanish at the same time, the surface is part of a plane, and we do not investigate such cases.
In the case for offsets of explicit quadratic surfaces, there are no self-intersections due to global distance function properties [26], thus if the maximum absolute value of the negative minimum principal curvature determines the largest offset without degeneracy. The largest magnitude of offset distance without degeneracy is called the maximum offset distance . In Sect. 8.3 we discussed how to find the global minimum of the minimum principal curvature of explicit quadratic surfaces.
Due to Lemma 8.3.1 the global minimum of the minimum principal curvature of the explicit quadratic surface occurs at the origin, except for a parabolic cylinder ((11.63) with =0) which has minima along the -axis with curvature value , and hence the maximum offset distance is determined to be . If the offset distance exceeds , the offset starts to degenerate from the point on the offset surface except for a parabolic cylinder progenitor, where the offset starts to degenerate along the line .
Substitution of the expression of the offset of the explicit quadratic
surface (11.63)
Theorem 11.3.2. The self-intersection curves of offsets of the explicit quadratic surfaces and their pre-images in the -plane are as follows [248]:
Proof:
Case (1): Since
is negative for the
hyperbolic paraboloid and we are assuming
and the left hand side of
(11.66) is always positive, this equation cannot be
used to derive the self-intersection curve. This
implies that the offset of a hyperbolic paraboloid does not
self-intersect in the
-direction (maximum principal
direction). However, we can use (11.67) to derive the
self-intersection curve in the
-direction (minimum
principal direction). Upon squaring and replacing
by
and
by
we obtain
Case (2): Since
is positive for the elliptic paraboloid, both
(11.66), (11.67) can be used to obtain
the self-intersection curves in the
-plane. This implies that the
offset of an elliptic paraboloid may self-intersect in both principal
directions. Since we have already
derived the equation from (11.67), we derive
another equation from (11.66). Upon
squaring and replacing
by
and
by
we obtain
Case (3): If we set in (11.75) and (11.77), both equations reduce to (11.72). Also if we set in (11.76), the parabola reduces to the point .
Case (4): Since is zero for the parabolic cylinder, (11.66) is not valid. Thus we set in (11.67) and replacing by we obtain , which is equivalent to (11.74). The self-intersection curve in three dimensional coordinates can easily be obtained in a similar manner with Case (1).
Note that the self-intersection curve of the offset of an elliptic paraboloid (when ) has a positive quadratic term, while those of a hyperbolic paraboloid and an elliptic paraboloid (when ) have negative quadratic terms.
Example 11.3.4. Consider an elliptic paraboloid with offset distance . Since , the offset surface self-intersects only in the -direction. The self-intersection curve is (dashed line in Fig. 11.20) and its pre-image in the -plane is (solid line in Fig. 11.20). The dot dashed line in this figure illustrates the set of footpoints of the self-intersection curve on the progenitor surface. A pair of thin solid straight lines emanating from two distinct points on the surface , and intersecting along the parabola are the pairs of vectors and .
To illustrate Theorem 11.3.2, we plot pre-images of the self-intersection curves along with cuspidal edges in the -plane for the hyperbolic paraboloid ( , , ), the elliptic paraboloids ( , , ), ( , , ) and ( , , ), the paraboloid ( , ) and the parabolic cylinder ( , , ) as depicted in Figs. 11.21 (a) to (f).
It is interesting to note that when the progenitor surface is a hyperbolic paraboloid or an elliptic paraboloid (see Fig. 11.21 (a) to (d)), the pre-images of the self-intersection curve of its offset which self-intersects in the -direction and the cuspidal edge always intersect tangentially at . The pre-image of the self-intersection curve of the offset of an elliptic paraboloid (see Fig. 11.21 (c)), which self-intersects in -direction, and the cuspidal edge intersect tangentially at , when the two cuspidal edges intersect with the -axis within the two umbilics. Whereas when the two cuspidal edges intersect the -axis outside the two umbilics (see Fig. 11.21 (d)), the pre-images of the self-intersection curve and the cuspidal edge intersect tangentially at .
It is apparent from (11.21) that the direction of the normal vector of the offset surface is opposite to that of the progenitor surface inside the loop of (dashed line) in the absence of the loop of (see Figs. 11.21 (a), (b), (e)), and the regions between outside the loop of (dot dot dashed line) and inside the loop of (see Figs. 11.21 (c), (d)), while the direction is the same within the loop of (see Figs. 11.21 (c), (d)).
Figures 11.22, 11.23 and 11.24 show self-intersecting offset surfaces, self-intersection curves and cuspidal edges in 3-D space and the trimmed offset surface of a hyperbolic paraboloid ( , , ), an elliptic paraboloid ( , , ) and an elliptic paraboloid ( , , ), respectively.
Figure 11.25 illustrates the self-intersections of the offset of a bicubic Bézier surface patch. Figure 11.25 shows the pre-images of the self-intersection curve in the parameter domain. The thick line represents the numerically traced self-intersection curve, while the thin line represents the ellipses of (11.69), (11.71), which are in quite good agreement. The same bullet symbols are mapped to the same locations on the offset surface. Figure 11.25 shows the mapping of the self-intersection curves in the parameter domain onto the progenitor surface. Finally, Fig. 11.25 shows the offset surface with its self-intersections.