Here's the relevant exert. I saw nothing related directly
preceding/following this. 

[Mike]
>> of Linux.  Kindly sort out what I've said from the retoric of
>> others.  What I said is NOBODY owns the name.  NOBODY owns Linux,
>> which means I've as much right to do with it waht I want as you
>> or the next guy does.
[Clemmitt]
>Well, my understanding is, maybe, maybe not.  I'm not a lawyer.
>But your decision to tell people who filed for the trademark
>and fought for it with Della Croce, through the good guises
>of some excellent lawyers who did all their work pro bono,
>was IMHO not wise.  They fought to prove Linus owns the
>mark, and they won.  At least that's my understanding
>not being a lawyer.  Are you a patent and trademark
>lawyer?
[Mike]
The same lawyer that took the case for Linus and LI gave me the advice I
stated on those pages.  Infact I hired him to handle a small trademark issue
for me.  Had I not had confidence in his advice, I would not have posted my
comments regarding the legitimacy of the trademark.  I still believe, despite
having followig Linus personal request, that the mark is invalid.