Other Research Topics:



Group Statement - Synoptic Characterization of the Land of the Amazon Rainforest



This characterization can be downloaded in Word format here.


1. Introduction

The Amazonian tropical rainforest is one of the most complex ecological systems on the planet. This complex ecological machine supports countless species of flora and fauna. At the present it is being destroyed at an alarming rate, undoing the work of thousands of years of evolution. This natural development has resulted in a complex ecological machine, with perfectly balanced biological interdependencies and ecological cycles, is unfortunately also sensitive to the drastic changes imposed by human encroachment. The land in the rainforest is a critical component in understand this ecological system. Thus in seeking to preserve the rainforest, one must examine the chemical and physics processes and characteristics of the soil itself. Since the soil characteristics are critical to the ability of the flora to proliferate, soil quality must be monitored. In examining the physical and chemical composition of this region, we will determine the natural tendencies of the Amazon Rainforest as well as some of the human activities which negatively impact the health of the land and soil.

To the Top


2. Physical Properties

The Amazon Rainforest is situated in a region known as the Amazon Basin. This is a depression in the Earth’s crust resulting from plate tectonic activity where sediments from erosion and river deposition accumulate (Schlumberger Oilfield Glossary, http://www.glossary.oilfield.slb.com/MainAbout.cfm, 2002). The resulting shape is a bowl, with continued deposition causing further depression. Naturally, the Amazon Basin is in a state of net deposition, amassing more deposition during each rainy season than is eroded during the rest of the year. In many areas, this deposition is beneficial, bringing fresh minerals from the Andes Mountains and surrounding uplands; however, this process can also lead to an imbalance in the constituents of the soil, depositing too much sand and clay, while creating a deficiency in mud.

This has repercussions for the porosity of the soil - it’s ability to retain water. Soils consisting primarily of sand have low porosity, and therefore nutrients held within water cannot be effectively stored for plant useage (Hillel, Daniel, Introduction to Soil Physics, New York, 1982, pp. 9-10)). As particle size decreases the permeability of the soil decreases while its porosity increases. As a result, clay does not effectively let water pass through its particles, but the water that does seep through is strongly retained (Hillel, Daniel, p. 192). Water and nutrients can be held within the clay layer, to an extent, but roots that penetrate into the clay layer will have difficulty trying to obtain enough water on a consistent basis to survive.

As a result, the optimal medium for agriculture is a mixture of sand, silt and clay. Besides striking a harmony between porosity and permeability, a mixture also allows for greater stability within the soil than can otherwise be maintained by a single particle group. For example, sand held within your hand breaks form at the slightest pressure, while clay on riverbanks is easily and rapidly eroded. Soils of the Amazon Rainforest generally consist of fine sands, silt and clay (i.e. Particles under 0.1mm in diameter). These particle sizes decrease drastically with an increase in soil depth so that inches under the soil a predominantly clay layer will be reached (Negreiros, Gustavo, Perfis de solos da Amazônia (RADAM, EMBRAPA, SUDAM e FAO), 1997). As a result only the top few inches of soil in the Amazon (the top soil) is effectively capable of maintaining nutrients and supporting root structure. One final consequence of the particle size distribution in the Amazon Basin is the presence of “leaching.” This is the process by which nutrients from the upper soil layers seep down into the clay layers below. The nutrients in the clay layer are effectively “trapped” by the clay particles and are difficult to retrieve by roots.

Over the course of thousands of years, natural processes of erosion and deposition have defined the current soil profile in the Amazon Basin. The soil is characterized in terms of four layers. The top layer, or O Horizon, consists of fresh organic matter, mostly fallen biological debris. This layer is quite thin due to high microbial activity. The next layer is the A Horizon, comprised of mineral nutrients and organic compounds. Compared to temperate soils, the tropical A Horizon is incredible small, extending down only 2-5 cm. In other soil types, the next layer, the B Horizon, is composed primarily of rocks, however, in the Amazon, few rocks actually survive the journey down from the Andes, and the resulting B Horizon is mostly soft sedimentary clay, continuing down as deep as four kilometers. The final layer, the C Horizon, is Precambrian bedrock.




In examining issues concerning the physical structure of the Amazon Basin, B Horizon is of particular concern. The high clay composition makes this layer unstable, allowing sediment to undergo compression in severely irregular patterns, causing large scale construction projects in the Amazon to be extremely difficult (“Where are the Rocks?” Tropical Rainforests: The Understory http://www.monogabay.com/05where_are_the_rocks.htm, 1996-2002). In addition, the clay is a sealant, resulting in virtually no osmosis of soluble ions or nutrients. Thus no nutrients can be stored below the thin A Horizon, making the preservation of the topsoil extremely critical in the continued viability of the soil. Because of these factors, erosional effects on tropical soils are more pronounced. When exposed to rain, such as after clearing of a forested area, nutrients are leached from the soil. This process is called eluviation and is “driven by the downward movement of soil water” (Ritter, Michael, http://www.uwsp.edu/geo/faculty/ritter/geog101/modules/soils/soil_development_profiles.html, Copyright 2001). Without the roots of the flora to hold the soil physically in place and the canopy to shield the soil from heavy rainfall, the A Horizon can also be washed away by surface erosion. Thus, even with agricultural plant cover, nutrients are depleted by these physical forces after only a few seasons.

To the Top


3. Chemical Properties

3.1 Chemical Cycles

To maintain a chemical equilibrium in any soils, there must be cycles where compounds pass in and out of the soil. It is important to understand the nature of these processes if we want to assess the health of the current forest, as well as feasibility of human use of this land. The most significant of these cycles when considered the soil’s importance to the surrounding flora are cycles involving organic material, most notably the carbon and nitrogen cycles.

The carbon cycle is the means by which organic wastes can be recycled into practical forms (Tan, Kim H., Environmental Soil Science, 2000, Marcel Dekker Inc.). Most carbon enters the system as CO2 from the atmosphere, which is then absorbed by plants and converted into carbohydrates through photosynthesis. These carbohydrates are incorporated into the plant matter and released into the soil through decomposition with leaf-fall or once the plants die. Microorganisms in the soil are responsible for the decomposition of this organic material, producing humic matter and eventually gaseous CO2, which is released into the air, where it can again be absorbed by plants.

The nitrogen cycle is very similar to the carbon cycle, though slightly more complicated. Like the carbon cycle, the system’s initial source of nitrogen is N2 gas from the atmosphere. When it reaches the soil, this gas must be converted into NO3- before it can be used by plants. This process, called nitrogen fixation, is carried out by microorganisms in the soil that are either symbiotic or nonsymbiotic. The symbiotic organisms are directly involved in symbiosis with another plant species, receiving glucose in exchange for useable nitrogen, while the nonsymbiotic are independent organisms living in the soil. Measurements have shown that nitrogen is more effectively fixed by symbiotic organisms, converting up six times as much N per year as nonsymbiotic organisms (Tan, Kim H. Environmental Soil Science, 2000, Marcel & Dekker Inc.). In an environment such as the rainforest, where the soil is unable to hold many nutrients, symbiotic nitrogen fixation is prevalent as an adaptation to nitrogen deficiencies. However, it is important to note that if there is an excess of inorganic nitrogen available for absorption, nitrogen fixing is reduced. Thus nitrogen fertilizers actually inhibit this aspect of the nitrogen cycle (Committee on Tropical Soils, Soils of the Humid Tropics, 1972, National Science Academy).

Once the nitrates are absorbed by the plants, they are held until the plants die, releasing nitrogenous compounds back into the soil. These compounds are converted into ammonia, which can either be absorbed directly by plants or converted into nitrates by microorganism, which are then absorbed. Any remaining nitrogenous material is converted back into N2 and released into the atmosphere by bacteria. Unfortunately, in soils such as those of the tropical rainforest with little nutrient storage capacity, much nitrogen can be lost through NO3- leaching with exposure to water, which not only depletes the soil of nitrogen but also degrades the water quality (Tan, Kim H. Environmental Soil Science, 2000, Marcel & Dekker Inc.). Therefore, deforestation in the tropics has a pronounced disruption of the nitrogen cycle.




3.2 Chemical Composition

As we would expect for extremely weathered soils, the pH of the tropical soils are acidic, as most basic compounds have been washed away by leaching. The average pH for the Amazon Basin is between 4.17 – 4.94 (Negreiros, G. H. de; Nepstad, D. C. 1994, Mapping deeply rooting forests of Brazilian Amazonia with GIS, Proceedings of ISPRS Commission VII Symposium - Resource and Environmental Monitoring, Rio de Janeiro. 7(a):334-338.). While the pH remains relatively constant over time, we can see that it has effects on the biological and chemical characteristics of the soil. Most microbiological life in the Amazon soils is fungi rather than bacteria, which prefer basic conditions. Chemically, soils below a pH of 6.0 are more likely to be deficient in certain nutrients optimal for plant growth, including Ca, Mg, K, and phosphate ions. Acidic soils are also more susceptible to Al3+ toxicity, as aluminum ions become more soluble as pH decreases (Tan, Kim H. Environmental Soil Science, 2000, Marcel & Dekker Inc.). Of course, native rainforest species are adapted to these conditions, thus an acidic pH, and its effects, only become an issue when we attempt to use the land for other purposes.

Another important factor to consider in characterizing soil chemical composition is Effective Cation Exchangeability (ECE). This is a measure of a soil’s ability to exchange positively charged ions with plant roots. In soils with high ECE, plants can easily exchange H+ for important nutrients, such as Ca, Mg, and K ions. As we have already mentioned, in tropical soils, these ion concentrations are already quite low in tropical soils, therefore, so is their exchangeability. For example, in data collected from the Cerado region of Brazil, K+ exchangeability was found to be 0.14 milliequivalents per 100g in the A Horizon (Mendonca, Eduardo S. & Rowell, David L. (1996), "Mineral and Organic Fractions of Two Oxisols and Their Influence on Effective Cation-Exchange Capacity" Soil Science Society of America Journal, 60(6)). This is compared to the 0.2 milliequivalents per 100g of K+ exchangeability that is considered to be a critically low level by agricultural standards (Jones, Benton J., Laboratory Guide for Conducting Soil Tests and Plant Analysis, 2001, CRC Press, Appendix E). ECE is generally considered to be determined by the soil’s physical qualities and organic matter content, thus it is also essential to look at organic matter levels in the Amazon Basin.

Organic C and N are the principle organic compounds in tropical soils. As expected, their percents compositions are low, being 0.95% for C and 0.10% for N (Mendonca, Eduardo S. & Rowell, David L. (1996), "Mineral and Organic Fractions of Two Oxisols and Their Influence on Effective Cation-Exchange Capacity" Soil Science Society of America Journal, 60(6)). This does not mean that there little organic matter in the system itself. Unlike other forests, most of the tropical rainforest’s biomass is stored in the plants themselves, while rapid bacterial decay ensures nutrients from decomposition are rapidly available for reabsorption (Encarta 2002, “Rain Forest”, 2002, Microsoft Co.). When land is cleared for agricultural purposes, therefore, plant species that do not have this ability to store large amounts nutrients are introduced to the soil. As a result, N and C are left in the poorly covered soil to be leached away by water.

3.3 Biological Components of Soil

In the soils of the Amazon, microorganisms play an important role in not only the carbon, nitrogen, and nutrient cycles, but also in aiding plant ion absorption. One of the most striking microorganisms is the Mycorrhizae fungi, which are involved in a symbiotic relationship with many species of plants, particularly tropical trees. They invade the primary cortex of the root system, but leave the main roots and secondary cortex intact. This effective increases the active surface area of the plant roots by as much as a factor of ten (Tan, Kim H. Environmental Soil Science, 2000, Marcel & Dekker Inc.). These fungi supply the plants with P, N, and K in a usable form, as well as limit pathogen entry through the roots. This results in increased water regulation, allowing for a more rapid recovery from droughts and abiotic stresses. In exchange, these plants provide the fungi with sugars produced through photosynthesis (Harley, J.L., Smith, S.E, Mycorrhizae Symbiosis (1983), Academic Press, London).

Recently, a study done in Venezuela (Cuenca, G., De Andrade, Z., Escalante, G, 1998, Arbuscular mycorrhizae in the rehabilitation of fragile degraded tropical lands. Biol Fertil Soils, 26) suggests that mycorrhizae inoculation could be used to aid in rehabilitation of deforested soils. The experimenters attempted two methods of treatments (as well as controls). One involved phosphorus fertilizers and mycorrhizal inoculation (I+P) while the other was only inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi (I). The (I+P) treatment caused a 60% increase in above ground biomass after a five month regrowth period as compared to a control, and twenty times that of the (I) treatment. The chemical analysis of these soils showed that while no exchangeable P was detected in the controls, there was about 2.17 mg/g in inoculated and fertilized soils. The researchers believe that this is because in general, plants in mature tropical ecosystems depend on presence of mycorrhizae for their development. Therefore, when disturbance, such as deforestation, causes a loss of mycorrhizae, “recovery of the degraded areas is only possible if these propagules are reintroduced by natural processes or human intervention” (Cuenca et al. 1998).

To the Top


4. Land Use

4.1 Agriculture and Ranching

The rapid deforestation currently occurring in the Amazon rainforests is not the result of a lack of suitable farmland but rather of the inefficiency of current agricultural methods. Although it may seem like humankind and nature can never coexist in harmony, this untrue. The current method of the slash-and-burn agriculture was at one time a sustainable technique, however this is no longer true in present sociological conditions. Slash and burn involves clearing a section of rainforest, fertilizing it by burning the preexisting plants, and then planting the desired crop. This method will be able to support only 2-3 years of production, after which the farmer leaves the field fallow and moves on to another plot of land. After approximately 25-30 years the farmer returns to the original field to burn the secondary growth forest and repeats the process. Due to increasing population pressure, the fallow time has now been significantly reduced. If these fields are planted with little or no nutrient input, yields of annual crops decline rapidly because of decreasing nutrient availability and weed encroachment, prompting farmers to clear additional sections of forest (Gotz Schroth, et. Al.) Clearly, current methods are not effective, and continuing to use them will only result in further deforestation.

A number of techniques of are used to prevent this loss of nutrients. The most popular of which is the use of fertilizers. However, in the context of rainforest soil, fertilizers offer little if any help. A large portion of the rainforest soil is, strangely enough, rich in Nitrogen. Therefore Nitrogen is not the primary deficient nutrient, rather organics are, and the addition of nitrogen into the soil will not affect crop yields. An alternative to traditional fertilizers is the use of green manure. Green manure is basically the use of decayed plant material as fertilizers. Although green manure is effective at increasing the organic compound level in soil, this benefit is decidedly short lived due to the inability of rainforest soil to retain nutrients. A technique that indirectly prevents unwanted loss of nutrients is the use of pesticides to combat encroaching weeds. However these chemicals, exposed to the forces of nature, end up being washed off into other areas of the Rainforest and leached into the clay layers below where they can lay dormant for many years. Some pesticides may be toxic to plant and animal life, inhibiting growth and causing illness.

Without an effective root structure, provided by the previously inhabiting tress, the soil loses much of its structural integrity and is far more prone to erosion than forested land. As well, during the rainy season, a lack of canopy cover exposes the land to excessive rainfall, leaching nutrients from the fertile topsoil to the clay layers below. During the dry season, the same lack of canopy cover leads to over-exposure of the land by the sun, baking the land and destroying the non-drought-resistant crops. Although the Amazon rainforest is not a watershed, due its high levels of precipitation and thin top soil layer, it has similar runoff patterns characteristic of watersheds. In a paired watershed study consisting of agroforestry (trees plus grass buffer strips), contour strips, and control treatments, it was shown that agroforestry reduced total phosphorous loss by 17%, total Nitrogen loss by 20% and effectively reduced nonpoint-source pollution in runoff (Udawatta, et. Al.).

For similar reasons as with agriculture, ranching is not very adaptable to the land of the Amazon Rainforest. The grasses required to feed cattle, like the crops maintained in agriculture are not resistant to the natural forces of the Amazon Basin and quickly deplete the nutrients of the surrounding soil. What nutrients that were once in the soil are removed from the ecosystem, shipped away as ground beef. Studies on land use have also suggested that the continuous movement of cattle on the unprotected land results in soil compacting, which increases the density of the soil material, resulting in decreased root penetration, water infiltration, and gas exchange (McGrath, Deborah, Smith, Ken, Gholz, Henry, de Assis Oliveira, Francisco, 2001, Effects of land-use change on soil nutrient dynamics in Amazonia, Ecosystems, 4). This means that larger flora, requiring a more extensive root system, are unable to grow under the compacted soil conditions, leaving the land for grass and woody shrub encroachment. The possible solutions to preventing nutrient loss are similar to those suggested for agricultural systems. Agroforestry is again a likely solution for this problem, and for the same reasons mentioned for agricultural systems: reduction of nutrient loss, erosion, and diversifying economic output.

The main danger to the ecosystem of the Amazon Rainforest from ranching and, especially, agricultural is the human need for survival. Once the land has become depleted of nutrients and infertile, it is no longer able to support the inhabitants who are forced to search for new lands to rebuild the farms and fields. As a result, most of the deforestation in the Amazon Rainforest is due to the displacement of farmers, peasants and ranches that are required to expand or move to maintain their way of living. Alternatively, those who can afford chemical fertilizers will attempt to use these to boost the fertility of the Amazonian land. However nitrogen, the chemical most commonly replaced by such fertilizers, is rarely deficient in Amazonian land. As a result fertilizers only serve to pump the land full of more nitrogen, which can at excessive levels be toxic, without increasing the productivity of the land. Finally, pesticides are also commonly used as an agricultural practice in the Amazon Rainforest to preserve crops and make the harvest more efficient. However these chemicals, exposed to the forces of nature, end up being washed off into other areas of the Rainforest and leached into the clay layers below where they can lay dormant for many years. Some pesticides may be toxic to plant and animal life, inhibiting growth and causing illness.

4.2 Mining

Due to rich mineral deposits deep within the Amazon Basin mining has become increasingly prevalent as a source of income and employment. However, the ecological impacts of mining techniques used within the Amazon create a number of problems for the surrounding ecosystem. To discover these ore and mineral deposits, mining companies create extensive networks of roads throughout the Amazon Basin, deforesting land and disrupting nature. Once a site may have been found numerous core samples are required to be taken by heavy machinery to test the site's viability. If a suitable site has been discovered the area is deforested to clear the land for extraction. The area is then blasted with nitroglycerin explosives to breaks rocks over an area of up to one square kilometer and up to a depth of fifty meters. Massive trucks (i.e. taller than jumbo jets) are then brought into the area to extract the rock from the pit and bring it to a processing facility. Once at the refinery the rock is sprayed with cyanide or mercury to separate the gold particles from the rock. However, careless containment procedures lead to the release of these chemicals into the natural surroundings. Once in nature, these contaminants inhibit plant growth and animal immunity, killing the flora and fauna.

To the Top


This page was last updated on November 11, 2002.
     If you have any questions or comments, please e-mail the webmaster.