MISSION 2007
polar bear

Team 1 Home

Carly's  Page Home

Definition of An A

My Work
     
Biography













ANWR
Summary of USGS Article
MIT logo
Mission logo

Summary of “The Oil and Gas Resource Potential of the Artic National Wildlife Refuge 1002 Area, Alaska

ANWR Assessment Team

Open File Report 98-34

US Geological Survey

 

Assessment Overview:

 

Abstract:

  • Comprehensive 3 year study large team of scientists
  • Last Assessment of 1002 was 1987
  • Estimated technically recoverable and economically recoverable oil and gas resources in 10 plays
  • TOTAL QUANTITY= 11.6 to 31.5 BBO, mean= 20.7 BBO
  • TECHNICALLY RECOVERABLE= 4.3 to 11.8 BBO, mean= 7.7 BBO
  • ECONOMICALLY RECOVERABLE- a curve shows increasing amounts of oil with increasing amounts of oil. 15 dollars/barrel, no oil, 16 d/b 1BBO, 20 d/b 3 BBO. Natural gas is non-economic for next 2 decades.
  • This estimate is large than previous because of increased resolution of seismic data and geologic info. From the well drilled outside 1002 with producible oil.

 

Intro:

  • 1002 is 8% of ANWR
  • Currently off limits to oil exploration and production
  • Only part of ANWR with significant amounts of oil.
  • In between, Prudhoe Bay (produce ¼ of U.S. Daily oil production) and Mackenzie Delta (50 petroleum discoveries)
  • Study extended 3 miles off shore
  • Petroleum assessed- crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids.

 

Assessment Project:

  • 46 scientists at some time in the 3 years of study.
  • Project-

·        New field studies

·        New well and sample data

·        New aeromagnetic data

·        Assessment method reviewed and modified

  • Well near 1002 were controls for the evaluation of petroleum resources
  • Made a data inventory from these wells- plots with boundaries, ages, lithologies, logs oil and gas indications, test results, engineering, thermal maturity, and source rock data
  • Used this data to infer in 1002
  • Reflection Seismic Data (required Act of Congress)

·        All 1,451 miles of seismic data from 1984-5 were reprocessed and interpreted.

·        Data was stacked, migrated and depth converted (previously only ¼ of the data was reprocessed and none was depth converted)

·        Interpreted seismic data, provided critical information on sizes, number of potential petroleum accumulations (traps)

·        Basic info- structural style, timing of deformation, seismic mappings, structural modeling, stratigraphic analysis

  • Other geophysical methods- Aeromagnetic survey purchased

·        Location, size, continuity and faulting of structures shallow and deep

·        With seismic data- interpretations of rock units at depth, determining areal distribution

 

Project Schedule:

  • At intervals of 6 to 9 months-workshops at Denver on Menlo Park to present geological data and interpretations
  • Late April 1997, preliminary assessment
  • January 1998- final assessment
  • Following final -several reviews written examining assessment
  • May 1998- results were released at annual AAPG meeting in Salt Lake City, Utah

 

Assessment Methodology:

  • Play-analysis method
  • Play- basic unit of assessment, defined as a volume of rock with common geologic attributes, such as source rock, reservoir rock, trapping mechanism, and timing.
  • Ten plays defined and assessed
  • Each play describes a number of prospects (potential oil or gas accumulation) as well as geologic and fluid characteristics
  • A rang e of values for numbers show uncertainty in the process
  • Also described as the deposit simulation method
  • Good method in 1002- where no petroleum has been identified and there is a limited amount of data.
  • Output- estimates of sizes, numbers, and depths of oil and gas accumulations- for economic analysis
  • Origin of method- Geologic Survey of Canada in NPRA exploration, development and production
  • Play definition- first step in assessment
  • Process

·        For each play- potential petroleum estimated based on geological characteristics (reservoir thickness, porosity..)

·        restricted to estimations to larger that 50 MMBO (so assessment would not be influence by small accumulations tat are non-economic)

·        Risking procedure- weigh likelihood to generate 50 MMBO applied to in-place estimate.

·        Recovery factor- appropriate to each play applied to in-place estimate to find technically recoverable estimate