|
"ARCTIC NATIONAL
WILDLIFE REFUGE PROTECTION"
Summary: The research notes on this
page discuss two similar documents, a Bill before the Senate and the Senate
Report that corresponds to it. The Bill is for the inclusion of all
of ANWR as wilderness, thus making drilling illegal by the legal definition
of wilderness. The Report discusses several things including the drilling
impact statement required by ANILCA 1980. Editors Note: The
section numbers listed here do not correspond to those listed regarding ANILCA
1980, because these refer to a 1991 document which is separate from ANILCA
1980.
Purpose: I conducted this research
to find what had become of the further analysis required by ANILCA 1980.
The debate of whether to open Section 1002 to drilling comes and goes
within Congress and it is important to follow up on previous requests for
further study.
Relevance: These documents have two major points of significance.
The first is that the House wanted to close the ANWR debate by designating
all of ANWR as wilderness. The second involves the report of impact
on 1002 by exploration. Summarized it says, "The wilderness character
of the 1002 area would be lost." It also states that the species in
question aren't endangered and therefore the Endangered Species Act does
not apply.
"A BILL to amend the National Wildlife Refuge Administration
Act" (1991 S. 39; 102 S. 39)
-14 Jan. 1991, 27 Nov. 1991
-ANWR proposed to be part of the National Wilderness
Preservation System.
NOTE: The Senate Report of BILL 39 follows.
ARCTIC NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE PROTECTION
(102 S. Rpt. 241)
-25 Nov. 1991
-The Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation
Act in 1978 turned into ANWR and designated 13 million acres as wilderness
-A 1980 version of ANILCA designated 8 of 19 million
acres wilderness, not including the coastal plain; calls for study of
oil and gas potential
-The importance of ANWR is stated in 303(2)(B)
of ANILCA
-A comprehensive report of the area, wildlife,
and energy potential required by section 1002 of ANILCA.
-"The 1002 report points out that oil development
'would result in long term changes in the wilderness environment, wildlife
habitats, and native community activities currently existing, resulting
instead in an area governed by industrial activities. The wilderness
character of the 1002 area would be lost'."
-An Act of Congress is required to drill by section
1003 of ANILCA.
-
"The fish and wildlife in the 1002
area that could be affected by oil and gas activities are 'very important
but are neither threatened nor endangered'."
Sources:
"A BILL to amend
the National Wildlife Refuge Administration Act" 1991 S. 39;
102 S. 39. 102nd Congress; 1st
Session in the Senate of the United States as Reported in the Senate. 14
Jan. 1991, 27 Nov. 1991.
"Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Protection." Senate Report 102-241
(102 S. Rpt. 241). 102nd Congress. 25 Nov. 1991.
|
|
|