Summary of the Economic Part of the Definition of an A

The price of the hydrocarbon’s in the world market is a crucial determining factor in the ‘value’ of the ‘potential’ for the ANWR region, as this is the factor that will ultimately make the distinction between drilling or not drilling in a cost-benefit analysis.

According to the Bloomberg energy prices, the current value of hydrocarbons are:

PETROLEUM ($/bbl)
 
PRICE*    CHANGE    % CHANGE    TIME
Nymex Crude    30.16    -0.14    -0.46    10/24
IPE Crude    28.58    -0.05    -0.17    10/24
Dated Brent $    30.02    0.55    1.87    10/24
WTI Cushing $    29.98    -0.14    -0.46    10/24

 NATURAL GAS ($/MMBtu)
 
PRICE*    CHANGE    % CHANGE    TIME
Nymex Henry Hub    4.79    -0.13    -2.58    10/24
Henry Hub $    4.8    -0.11    -2.24    10/24
New York City Gate $    5.12    -0.4    -7.25    10/24

(these values are mirrored in other economic sources, such as the Economist, and so can be considered trust worthy as- after all- it is the news agency’s job to deliver the most accurate pricing for such a hot commodity).

As the numbers above demonstrate, there are different types of oil and natural gas that sell for different prices. These prices are, however, very near each other, and so in the long run can be considered the ‘same price.’

According to the OPEC tables of ‘global oil trends’ the lowest value of oil is around $20 a barrel and the highest value peaks nearer to $35 a barrel. This figure is subject to change due to political events, fluctuating oil reserves/ production, and to the health of the oil market at the time. A concrete formula for the ‘future value of oil’ has not yet been found: as a result, an applet is being made that will return the ‘value’ of ANWR if inputted a range of prices and volumes.

The revenue estimates would be equal to the volume of oil/gas extracted multiplied by the value of unit volume. This is under calculation right now; take Andrew’s table and multiply it by the lower value, middle value, and upper value, and that will give the overall worth. [This is being done at 3:15 today…]

The “cost estimates” referred to in the Definition of an A refer to the collaboration with Team 8 in comparing the cost of drilling (which Team E will provide) with the potential value of the hydrocarbons that Team 1 will provide. At this time, since the strategy is not made, this is not possible to estimate.

The definition also calls for a ‘brief comparison to other world hydrocarbon sources’ in order to give a general idea of how ANWR fares with respect to the rest of the world. The following figures are from the OPEC yearly report:


    Proven Reserves    Production
Region    Natural Gas (billion standard cu m)    Crude Oil (m. b)    Natural Gas (million standard cu m)    Crude Oil (1000 b/d)
North America    6898    27646    722924    7256.1
Latin American    7507    111173    139750    9125.4
Eastern Europe    57493    79190    760950    9038.7
Western Europe    6955    18268    290640    5933.2
Middle East    71546    698906    243840    18655.4
Africa    13207    93550    138730    6459.5
Asia and Pacific    14118    38434    292070    7176.1

Further research is being conducted on finishing the over-due Applet; finding the trends of oil in the world (whether the prices are increasing, decreasing, at what rate, when, what the output usage is, etc.); the production figures for the United States on a state-by-state basis (to compare Alaska directly to other states); and the future US production trends.
The sources being used so far are primarily the articles and figures from the American Petroleum Institute (which provides information on the US market and production), documents from the Alaska Department of Energy (for information directly related to Alaska), and the OPEC reports (both the yearly and the monthly) which give information on global oil trends, figures etc. It is believed that although these sources may have a slight bias (in order to promote their own bureaucracy), their figures would be more accurate as they would be subject to the scrutiny of the international community.

back to Research                                    
MIT Logo this page updated on Nov. 12, 2003