A collection of some of the significant things I have read,
deduced,
or created with help from the websites listed in the Research Links section.
The numbers next to each entry will take you to the citations of the sources
used for each item.
The latest material is listed first.
BYLAWS OF ORGALA
(THE FIRST DRAFT OF THE FINAL STRUCTURE)
This is a bit too large,
so click here
INDIVIDUAL TRANFERABLE QUOTAS
(ITQs): FINAL PLAN A bit to big
to include, so click here
Sources: 11722
OUR SECOND POLITICAL SOLUTION
After a
consideration of the strengths and weaknesses of the previous plan,
we formulated another idea based on a coalition of NGOs who support the
Galápagos. This plan forms the nucleus for the final plan. The
final plan can be found in the Las Iguanas team website here.
Sources:
159111316182024
****************************************
NGO’s with a vested
interest in the Galápagos will be unified underneath a broad international coalition,
ORGALA.
Representation within
ORGALA and voting power would be based on annual contributions to the
Galapagos. ORGALA will elect a scientific panel and funnel all their financial
donations into that scientific commission. The panel will serve
the following primary purposes:
1. Make policy recommendations
for INGALA, the Galápagos National Park Service, the Ministry
of the Environment, or any other body that has some kind of jurisdiction
over the Galápagos.
2. Make recommendations for the
distribution of funding to causes that require greater attention.
3. Use the lobbying power of ORGALA’s
consolidated funds to influence reticent government agencies.
4. ORGALA would have the ability
to exercise an "economic veto" (a freezing of funding) similar to the
actions taken by the World Wildlife Foundation during the dispute over
the park director.
The advantage of this plan over the current
situation is that ORGALA would control far more funds than any single
NGO, and their combined weight would be a powerful policy catalyst.
POSSIBILITY 2: This possibility
is identical to the plan above, with the exception that the scientific
panel would not directly disburse funds. The primary distinction would
be in the role of ORGALA’s stake holders. Instead of vesting complete
faith in the scientific panel’s every action, the proportional representation
from each NGO would vote on the panel’s recommendations. The advantage here
is that stake-holders in ORGALA would have far greater control over their
own donations, which would make ORGALA a more attractive entity to join.
****************************************
OUR FIRST ATTEMPT AT A POLITICAL
SOLUTION After
long thought, we came up with a tentative plan for establishing an
international trust to implement a protection plan for the Galápagos.
Sources:
1591113161820
****************************************
THE PLAN:
UN aid is offered to Ecuador with a
number of provisions:
1. An international commission
composed of a scientific panel that drafts proposals and a ratifying
representative board (as described below) that can ratify or veto
the scientific panel’s plans.
2. The international commission
must be allowed to implement a basic preservation strategy that we
design.
3. The international commission’s
mandates must be ratified by the Ecuadorian Congress as law.
4. Disputes will be referred
to the World Court
The international commission:
-Composition:
Scientific Panel = An international group of scientists (chosen by
some outside group
Representative Board = (In some defined proportions) Fishing interests,
the Ecuadorian government, Local interests, and some kind of environmental/scientific
interests
-Powers:
Regulate tourist access
Fishing quotas in Marine Reserve
Maintain an armed park ranger enforcement force
Request assistance from the UN security council
Undertake invasive species eradication programs
Deploy of sensors as the international body sees fit
***********************************
2217Individual Transferable Quotas (ITQs)
- A possible solution to the over-fishing problem
This wasn’t really in
my field of research as a member of the political team, but twice I
ran across an interesting economic concept that relates to the management
of a fragile renewable resource.
ITQs are a type
of share that harvesters can share in a natural resource, for example
fish. The government sells shares of the fish harvest to potential
fishermen in the form of numbers of fish per season. Thus, the fisherman
can only take as many fish as they have shares in the fish harvest.
One of the most common methods which often presents many problems is total
quota assignment, in which the government sets a certain quantity of fish
that may be taken out of an area of water in a season; once that amount
has been harvested, no one may harvest more fish.
If enforced, ITQs protect
fish populations by limiting the take of fish (just like total quotas),
but they also prevent the total quota phenomenon of fishing "gold rushes".
In a system of total quotas, fishermen rush out on the first day of the
season and madly fish to try and get as large a slice of the quota pie
for themselves as they can.
In an ITQ system,
since the fishermen own their own quotas, they can take in the fish
at their own leisure.
This prevents flooding the market with
huge amounts of fish that no one wants to buy, which would result in
rapid deflation of fish prices, which cuts sharply into every fisherman’s
profits.
It also eliminates
the incentive for fishermen to endanger their crews and equipment by
pushing their crews to the limit in their rush to take in fish.
ITQs also provide an entry
barrier for entry into the fishing industry, which reduces competition
for the existing fishermen.
ITQs also have their
disadvantages; for instance, ITQs have a tendency to accumulate in
the hands of large fishing businesses, since it is sometimes difficult
for fishermen to come up with the lump sum to buy ITQs.
21Elements
of an International Environmentally Protective Treaty -
If we decide to
back our protection plan with an international treaty, here is what
I have deduced are several common parts of an environmental protection
agreement between several countries.
1. Reasoning for the need for
the treaty
2. Exact purpose of the treaty
3. Definitions of just about
every noun used in the treaty (legal soundproofing)
4. The basic obligations that
the treaty places on signing states
5. The content of the treaty
- what they are agreeing to exactly in high detail
6. A description of a committee
for overseeing the implementation of the treaty (if one is necessary),
including composition, voting procedures, meeting times and places,
etc.
7. Possible the liability of
signing states and the recourse for noncompliance
8. The territory disclaimer -
the treaty will not affect the claims of states on any territory
9. (Sometimes) a description
of the process for resolving disputes over the treaty, often invoking
the authority of the World Court.
US Ambassador: Gangotena,
Raul
Min. of Tourism: Eljuri,
Gladys
President: Gutierrez Borbua,
Lucio
Vice Pres.: Palacio, Alfredo
Min. of Environment: Valdivieso,
Fabian
Min. of Urban Development & Housing;
Poggi, Bruno
Sec. of National Planning & Development:
Fuentes, Maria
Permanent Representative to the UN,
New York: Gallegos Chiriboga, Luis
Min. of Foreign Trade:
Baki, Ivonne
Min. of Economy & Finance:
Yepez, Mauricio
16Main
points on the World Heritage Treaty - The treaty that created
the World Heritage Commission (part of UNESCO) gives an idea of the usefulness
and limitations of employing UNESCO in a solution of the environmental
problems of the Galápagos.
The World Heritage
Commission is a group of UN members who collect from participating countries
a list of areas of high cultural or environmental significance.
The Commission decides whether or not to include the site on their list.
Then, they regularly review the sites on their list, and can choose to
list a site as a "World Heritage Site" in danger. The Commission
can also distribute funds to States that request them to preserve World
Heritage sites in their sovereignty, but the commission MAY NOT DO ANYTHING
WITHOUT STATE CONSENT. The States are required to contribute significantly
to the funds of the World Heritage organization, (unless it doesn’t
want to, thanks to a disclaimer).
Ecuador National Commission for
UNESCO: Comisión Nacional Ecuatoriana
para la UNESCO
Ministerio de Educación y Cultura
Calle Buenos Aires 136 y 10 de Agosto,
5º piso
Casilla 17-01-561
Quito
Ecuador
2Environmental
agreements Ecuador has ratified
Antarctic Treaty
An interesting agreement between many
countries for conduct, activities, ;and relations in Antarctica with
significant and strong language. It basically provides for free
access for scientists of all countries, prohibits actions that could
endanger the fragile ecosystem of the Antarctic such as dumping nuclear
waste (which was a bright idea some had back them for disposal of nuclear
waste). The situation wasn’t really like that of the Galápagos,
but it has some elements of a precedent.
Biodiversity Treaty
Climate Change Treaty
Climate Change-Kyoto Protocol
Desertification Treaty
Endangered Species Treaty
Hazardous Wastes Treaty
Ozone Layer Protection Treaty
Ship Pollution Treaty
Tropical Timber Treaty 83
Tropical Timber Treaty 94
Wetlands Treaty
1Biosphere
Status
The "Biosphere National
Committee of Ecuador" declared the Galápagos a "Biosphere".
The Galápagos is also a World Heritage Site (a function of the
World Heritage Committee of UNESCO), a Biosphere Reserve, and an Ecuador
National Park.
8Ecuador’s
Sea Claims - Ecuador claims as its sea territory the continental
shelf between the Ecuador and the Galápagos.
8A Timeline
of Events Involving the Galápagos
10 Mar 1535 Spanish
discover the islands.
12 Feb 1832 Annexed
by Ecuador as a territory.
15 Sep 1835 Visit
of Charles Darwin aboard the H.M.S. Beagle.
1851 - 1869 San
Cristobal used as a penal colony.
1892 Named Archipelago
de Colón.
1941 - 1948 U.S.
air base on Baltra.
4 Jul 1959 All areas
of the Galápagos declared a national park,
minus previously settled areas.
1968 Administration
by the Galapagos National Park Service begins.
12 Feb 1973 Galápagos
becomes a province.
2A Brief
Run-Down on the Ecuadorian Government and History Ecuador is a republic
with a turbulent history of frequent military coups and government
takeovers. The government is somewhat socialist in character;
many industries are still highly state-owned. In 1999, due to
a confluence of falling oil prices and a series of natural disasters,
the economy imploded. Eventually the leader at the time dollarized
the economy over loud protests, and since then the dollar has been the
official currency (it replaced the sucre).
The government is headed by a President
advised by a cabinet of ministers at the heads of agencies. The
system is highly federal with little provincial power, and the President
of the Republic is a powerful person. The President is elected
for four years with no reelection possible.
The National Congress is a 100 seat
unicameral body. The seats are elected by the twenty provinces
for four-year terms.
The major seat-holding parties are:
Social Christian
Party (PSC) - 25 seats
Roldosist Party
(PRE) - 15 seats
Democratic Left
(ID) - 16 seats
National Action
Institutional Renewal Party (PRIAN) - 10 seats
Patriotic Society
Party (PSP) - 9 seats
Pachakutik Movement
- 6
Popular Democratic
Movement (MPD) - 5
Popular Democracy
(DP) - 4
Socialist Party
- Broad Front (PS-FA) - 3
Main industries:
petroleum, food
processing, textiles, wood products, chemicals
More Interesting Facts
There are ~15,000 inhabitants on Galapagos,
3% of the land area is inhabited
KEY INDUSTRIES: Cattle grazing,
tourism, and fishing
3,000 cattle in cattle herds on Isabella
1990 - 1995 ==> 7.8% pop growth
Value of Galapagos tourism to Ecuador
economy: $55 million
National Park Zones:
There are 6 zones
3 zones allow tourists
23 parts are "intensive visitor zones" = 90 people at a time on land
17 "extensive visitor zones" = 12 people at a time
(and one other?)
On Isablla, popular scuba diving sites
are Roca Redonda, Punta Vicente Roca
Sea Cucumber fishermen camp illegally
on the uninhabited Fernandina, use endangered mangroves for fire fuel,
and introduce species into the pristine ecosystem.
The following are a list of links (with brief descriptions)
that I used in some capacity during my research (in the chronological
order in which I found them). The number of Xs in the brackets indicate
my rating of the usefulness of the resource for my purposes, from 0
(somewhat useful) to 6 (essential).
The numbers ascribed to each link are those used as reference
numbers (and links to the listing on this page) in my research (printed
immediately previous to the each item 's title)
1.
Charles Darwin Society [XXXXX_]
The main research organization with
a station on Galàpagos. The CDF is dedicated to studying
and preserving the Galàpagos. http://www.darwinfoundation.org/ 2. CIA World
Factbook: Ecuador [XXXX__]
A very useful list of basic statistics
about Ecuador. http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ec.html#Govt 3. BBC News
Article [XX____]
Ecuador is building a new oil pipeline
that will go through protected fragile ecosystems inland. Activists
worry that leaks due to seismic activity and routine leaks will destroy
the ecosystem. Oil pollution already does much damage to wildlife
and to local populations and farmers. The economocentric government
doesn't seem to be sympathetic to the protesters. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1930671.stm 4. Mongabay.com
[XX____]
Some information about Ecuador’s environmental
record. http://www.mongabay.com/20ecuador.htm
10. Las Encantadas:
Human and Cartographic History of the Galàpagos Islands
[X_____]
An amazing source of antique maps and
photographs of the Galàpagos and its explorers. I haven't
seen anything else on the internet as good as this about the cartography
and human history of the Galàpagos islands. Not very useful for my project, but
fascinating to browse through. http://www.Galapagos.to/MAPS.HTM
11. Island
Trust Fund [XXX___]
An organization dedicated to protecting
the West coast of Canada islands - interesting precedent for Galàpagos
(It is only based on land donations
and conservation covenants) http://www.islandstrustfund.bc.ca 12. Australian
Government, Antarctic Divison [XXXX__]
A site about Antarctica and the Antarctic
Treaty from the Australian government. http://www-old.aad.gov.au/information/treaty/treaty.asp 13. International
Court of Justice [XXXXX_]
Official website of the judiciary
body of the UN http://www.icj-cij.org 14. NASA Visible
Earth
[XX____]
"Visible Earth" NASA space imagery program. Definitely worth
a look - a huge compilation of unbelievable images.
The background image you see on this
page is from this site. http://visibleearth.nasa.gov/ 15. Island
Conservation [XXXX__]
An organization that moves to protect
Mexican Pacific Island ecosystems. http://www.islandconservation.org/ 16. UNESCO
World Heritage website [XXXXXX]
The official website of the World
Heritage Commission, a body formed from the United Nations Educational,
Scientific, and Cultural Organization. http://whc.unesco.org/pg.cfm?cid=160 17. Economics.About.com
[XXXX__] An economic thesis about ITQs (Individual
Transferable Quotas), and interesting economic idea applied to the
Maine lobster fishing problem. http://economics.about.com/cs/moffattentries/a/lobster_3.htm 18. An article
about a hostage situagion involving sea cucumber fishermen.
[XXXX__] http://seawifs.gsfc.nasa.gov/OCEAN_PLANET/HTML/ps_galapagos.html 19. A good
background informational site about Ecuador from the US immigration
service. [XXXX__] http://www.immigration-usa.com/wfb2004/ecuador/ecuador_chiefs.html 20. World Legal
Information Institute [XXXXXX]
An interesting, comprehensive, independent
database of international law. This link gives a list of Ecuadorian
government websites. http://www.worldlii.org/catalog/50714.html 21. "Multilaterals
Project", Edwin Ginn Library, Tufts University [XXX___]
A great resource for international
agreements, focusing on environmental agreements. http://fletcher.tufts.edu/multilaterals.html 22. National
Council for Science and the Environment [XXXX__]
A great paper about ITQs, explaining
their benefits, a better explanation and discussion than (17)
http://www.ncseonline.org/NLE/CRSreports/Marine/mar-1.cfm 23. The Ministry
of the Environment Website [XXX___]
This is the organizational structure
of the Ministerio del Ambiente (note the Galapagos Park Service in the
upper left, whose link, perhaps due to the upheaval over Naula's dismissal,
is not functioning). Unfortunately, this website is Spanish only. http://www.ambiente.gov.ec/ 24. The Miami
Herald [XXX___]
This is an interesting article about
Ecuador asking the Inter-American Development Bank to intervene in
a conflict between sea-cucumber fisherman. http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/world/americas/10033361.htm?1c
==> TO My Research
==> TO Homepage
==> TO Las Iguanas team
2
==> TO Mission 2008
==> TO Massachusetts Institute of Technology!