Last updated 10/24/04
Marine Sensors Research
Pitfalls to monitoring efforts
ambiguous management
objectives
poor study design
low statistical precision
lack of commitment
to implementation
failure to
communicate results
How to avoid such pitfalls
measurable objectives
proper field techniques
use of sampling design
tools
correct analysis approaches
reporting/using results
The Antarctic Treaty
Fourteen articles address
only peaceful puposes, no
military bases/weapons testing
freedom of scientific
research to all countries
scientific cooperation,
exchange of personnel, equipment, material
maintain sovereignty at
time of treaty's establishment
inspection of all parties,
stations, equipment to insure adherence to rules
advanced notice of
expeditions
periodic meetings to
advance pupose of treaty
procedure to modify treaty
any member of UN can join
Agreed measures for conservation of flora/fauna
protect plants/animals
licenses required to
take/harm any wildlife
set specially protected
areas and areas of special scientific interest
Seal Convention
regulate commercial
sealing, make plan for sustainable population
enforcement left to
individual nations
Ammendment Process
requries
ratification by all contracting parties
Protocol on environmental protection to Antarctic
Treaty
designates as
natural reserve, devoted to peace and science
creates Committe for
Environmental Protection
subjects all
activities to environmental impact assessment
develops contingency
plans for response to environmental emergencies
rules for disposal
of waste on land and sea
management of
protected areas
Antarctic Specially Protected areas (permit for
entry)
Antarctic Specially Managed areas (stricter
regulations)
NGO's involved
International Union
for the Conservation of Nature
United Nations
Environment Program
Field Techniques for Measuring Vegetation
Techniques aimed at shrubs/herbs somewhat
toward trees
Also work for
sessile animals
Things to
measure
density
– individuals/unit area
frequency – proportion of
sampling
units containing species
cover – ground surface covered by
plant (%)
biomass – plant material produced
over unit time
plant vigor – on individuals
(i.e.
height, number of flowers)
Complete population counts
only for small area
use grid pattern
permanently mark boundaries for
accurate future counts
Sampling vegetation
sampling unit generally quadrat
two stage: 1. quadrat 2.
individuals
within quadrat
consistent boundary protocol for
plants on edge of quadrat
“in” along two
sides, “out”
along other two gives most accurate figure
primary sampling unit must be
independent (island in our case?)
if not independent,
underestimation of
standard error, questionable results
Density estimates
only effective for species with
recognizable counting unit
bad for long-lived plants that
respond
to stress with reduced cover/biomass
mortality will not occur/results
won't show trend
quadrats should be elongated
rectangles, counted from one side
more precise if large or square
but
much less efficient
control of boundary protocol
essential
usually rooted boundary better
than
canopy except for matted plants
count by stages (seedling,
reproductive, non-reproductive)
more
information for future
projections
Frequency
% of total plots containing
species
especially useful in determining
spacial arrangement – invasive species
misses density changes so some
biological changes missed
optimal numbers between 30-70% -
both
increase and decrease noticeable
plot size determines % range
large plots approach 100%
occurrence
Cover
most common measure of community
composition
dramatic change within growing
season
either basal (ground level) or
canopy
(bird's eye view)
popular due to ease and speed of
data
collection
reduce variability with frames
ex. 50x50
frame divided into 10x10
segments
group
partially filled squares
randomly chosen transect lines,
several quadrats along each recommended
average the values of cover for
above
line intercepts – distance that
contains canopy/total distance
can be
effected by wind
point intercept reduces to
question of
“hit” or “no hit”
transect is less time consuming
than
plot
plot more precise than point
point less time consuming than
lines,
lines better for rare plants
Production and vigor indicators
height, base, number of
flowers/leaves/stems
often involve harvesting and
taking
mass – most likely bad for Galapagos
Choosing proper technique
rhizomes – frequency
matted plants – cover
long-lived plants – vigor shows
stress because they are hard to kill
dense shrubs – aerial cover or
line
intercept
Specialized Sampling Methods and Field
Techniques for Animals
Capture-recapture
for success
need high number captured (>50)
still not very
accurate
marker cannot
affect behavior/social status
cannot affect
chance of recapture (learning to avoid traps)
marks must be
distinguishable for second capture
pop. Size =
(#first catch+1)(#second catch+1)/(#marked second catch)
Mark-resight
good whenever above circumstances
aren't met
often involve radio collars for
knowledge of # marked that are alive
Removal method
large effect on ecosystem, so not
good
for Galapagos
Distance sightings
assume all individuals along
transect
are visible
assume individuals aren't far
from
point of origin
works like density for plants
Indices
track densities, calls, other
signs of
activity
only effective when linear
relationship is recognizable
if possible, account for other
factors
(observers, weather, etc.) over years
begin with controlled experiment
to
establish linear relationship
For butterflies
sightings along “routes” on
specific type of day
won't give accurate population,
but
gives relative numbers year to year
For beetles
pit traps (cup dug into ground,
need
not be lethal if checked often)
use chemicals to deter predators
from
eating from traps
For aquatic invertebrates
catch screen, disturb bottom
surface
(streams)
portable invertebrate box samplers
artificial substrates introduced,
periodically checked for colonization
core/dredging samples from boat
For fish
manual counting with SCUBA gear
capture with fishing rod for
large
fish
minnow traps for small fish
nets often used but if left alone
must
be checked often to reduce mortality
electroshocking with DC to reduce
harm
to fish
all these methods used in
mark-recapture technique
difficult because fish tend to be
in
clusters and move a lot
high sampling
variationextensive rather than intensive
studies
stratify
samples
pilot studies key to defining
scope to
be cost effective and insure useful info
For amphibians and reptiles
sightings along transect line,
move
objects that block view
compare lines for relative
abundance
litter quadrats
randomly or
systematically
distributed
search through
leaf litter, record
sightings
introduction of artificial cover
objects (wood or sheet metal)
auditory records for frogs
<> floating pit traps for turtles
(checked often)
For birds
> point counts (count
individuals
seen/heard from point in set radius)<>
done during primary mating season
flock counts, use of calls/record
reactions>
<>For mammals
line transect sightings of
indices and
individuals (large mammals)><>
trap sites for rodents/other
small
mammals
indices often most valuable for
mammals>