Category G: Great power and allied involvement
Phase 2 Factors
| 2G-01 | The US is impartial at this stage |
| 2G-02 | The US is not impartial at this stage |
| 2G-03 | US policy supports "status quo" side |
| 2G-04 | US policy is friendly to "non-status quo" |
| 2G-05 | The US urges direct talks to settle the dispute |
| 2G-06 | US public opinion is favorable to "non-status quo" side |
| 2G-07 | The Soviet Union is impartial at this stage |
| 2G-08 | The Soviet Union is not impartial at this stage |
| 2G-09 | Great powers are losing interest in the conflict |
| 2G-10 | One great power becomes an active mediator |
| 2G-11 | A previously-supportive great power drops its support |
| 2G-12 | Great powers collaborate on resolution of conflict |
| 2G-13 | Regional powers actively pursue peaceful settlement |
| 2G-14 | One side discounts the threat of intervention by the other side's ally |
| 2G-15 | Major ally of "non-status quo" side strongly prefers a peaceful settlement |
| 2G-16 | Major ally of "status quo" side strongly prefers a peaceful settlement |
| 2G-17 | No major ally of "non-status quo" side shows a preference for peaceful settlement |
| 2G-18 | No major ally of "status quo" side shows a preference for peaceful settlement |
| 2G-19 | "Status quo" side's major ally is distracted and gives it relatively low priority |
Copyright © 1999 Lincoln P. Bloomfield and Allen Moulton