January -March Issue
Predicting Global Climate Change: New Tools,
New Insights
new climate-change model developed at MIT provides scientists
and policymakers with an unprecedented ability to analyze potential impacts
of human activities and proposed policies on the global climate system.
The model simulates economic growth and associated emissions, flows of
greenhouse gases into and out of land and oceans, chemical reactions in
the atmosphere, climate dynamics, and changes in natural terrestrial ecosystems.
It also includes previously ignored interactions among those processes--interactions
that can have a substantial impact on predicted outcomes. For example,
most models assume that emissions of methane and nitrous oxide from wetlands
and soils are constant. But MIT simulations show that predicted rises in
temperatures will cause natural emissions of those greenhouse gases to
increase by 15%-60%. Other results suggest that when carbon dioxide levels
become very high, the oceans may be a less effective "sink" for
that gas than is often predicted. By simplifying certain components, the
researchers made the model "computationally efficient" without
compromising its ability to represent key climate phenomena. Performing
long-term simulations and repeated runs with changed assumptions is therefore
economically feasible. A series of runs using a range of plausible assumptions
regarding human emissions, ocean circulation, and cloud cover suggests
that predictions of temperature change are even more uncertain than generally
believed. The researchers are now using the model to clarify key sources
of uncertainty and to examine the effectiveness and costs of proposed policy
options.
Policies to address global climate change are the subject
of much national and international debate. How serious is the climate-change
problem? What level of response is appropriate? And what types of policies
would be effective in alleviating any potential threat? Answering those
questions is difficult because connections among human behavior, emissions,
and natural systems are so complex. Emissions of greenhouse gases depend
on economic, technological, and political forces. How those emissions then
affect climate depends on complicated, interacting phenomena in the atmosphere,
the oceans, and land ecosystems. And any change in climate in turn influences
all aspects of the system. Until we better understand this elaborate global
system, we cannot reliably predict the impacts of continuing human emissions,
nor can we predict the effectiveness of specific policies being considered.
Much climate-change research focuses on only one discipline and one component
of the global system. In contrast, MIT's Integrated Global System Model
(IGSM) both describes all the components and integrates them. This inclusive
approach is made possible by the interdisciplinary nature of the large
research team involved. The team includes experts in economic growth, technological
change, and emissions; climate chemistry and physics; and the biology of
ecosystems.
The specialists are brought together by the MIT Joint Program on the Science
and Policy of Global Change, which draws on two MIT centers-the Center
for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEPR) and the Center for
Global Change Science (CGCS). Added breadth is provided by participants
from the Ecosystems Center at the Marine Biological Laboratory (Woods Hole,
Massachusetts), other MIT departments, and industrial groups. Leading the
effort are Ronald G. Prinn, TEPCO Professor of Atmospheric Chemistry and
director of the CGCS, and Henry D. Jacoby, William F. Pounds Professor
of Management and former director of the CEEPR.
In developing the IGSM, the MIT team had three goals. The model should
permit researchers to examine the science of global climate change and
the interactions among the many components involved. It should help clarify
the effects and costs of proposed policies such as emissions quotas and
taxes. And it should help investigators figure out what makes predictions
of global climate change--both its magnitude and its timing--so uncertain.
Many of the processes involved are not well understood, so modeling them
requires making assumptions and approximations. Such uncertainty propagates
through the integrated model in complicated ways, ultimately contributing
to the uncertainty of the final result. The IGSM should enable scientists
to identify and explore key sources of the uncertainty that now hinders
both scientific understanding and policy assessment.
To perform all those functions, the IGSM must simulate a huge number of
physical and chemical phenomena and track many individual chemical species,
accounting for their behaviors and their impacts on climate. Moreover,
its calculations must be resolved geographically. Amounts and types of
emissions vary with latitude and are expected to change over time, shifting
from Europe and North America to China and southern Asia during the next
century. Temperatures and other climatic conditions and the nature of the
earth's surface also vary with location, influencing both emissions and
chemical reactions in the atmosphere. Because of such regional differences,
the impacts of climate change and the effects of a given policy will differ
dramatically from place to place.
After five years' work, the MIT team has developed a model that begins
to provide the needed level of completeness and detail. The diagram below
outlines the key models (in boxes) and information flows (in ovals) of
the IGSM.
The Anthropogenic Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis
Model (at the top of the diagram) forecasts future anthropogenic emissions
of carbon dioxide (CO2), sulfur oxides
(SOX), nitrous oxide (N2O),
and other key gases. The model covers the period 1985 to 2100 in five-year
steps and recognizes twelve regions of the world, linked by trade. For
each region it tracks population change, technological change, economic
growth, and the energy intensity of economic activity. Based on those forces,
it predicts the magnitude, composition, and location of future anthropogenic
emissions.
The Natural Emissions Model (at the left) predicts emissions from
natural sources based on estimates of future temperatures, rainfall, and
other climatic variables and predictions of the condition of land ecosystems,
supplied by the Terrestrial Ecosystems Model (at the bottom). It recognizes
different types of soils and wetlands and their geographical locations
and determines the natural uptake and emission of N2O
from soils and methane (CH4) from wetlands.
Predictions of anthropogenic and natural emissions (resolved by latitude)
feed directly into the Coupled Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model
(at the center). The climate portion of this integrated model simulates
global climate dynamics including critical physical processes such as radiation
and convection and the effects on those processes of all significant greenhouse
gases and a variety of aerosols (suspended particulate matter, the most
important being sulfate aerosols resulting from SOX
emissions). It also includes the crucial role of ocean circulations, which
can remove both heat and CO2 from the atmosphere.
It differentiates between climate dynamics over land and ocean at each
latitude. An interactive atmospheric chemistry submodel includes more than
50 chemical reactions and recognizes 25 chemical species. The passage of
CO2 into and out of the ocean is also calculated.
Based on temperatures and other outputs of the climate model, the chemistry
submodel determines the formation and destruction of important greenhouse
gases and aerosols and feeds the predictions back into the climate model.
Finally, the Terrestrial Ecosystems Model predicts how changes in
climate and atmospheric composition will affect the state of terrestrial
ecosystems--one measure of the potential impact of global climate change.
The model, developed by collaborators at the Marine Biological Laboratory,
simulates fundamental biogeochemical processes in 18 terrestrial ecosystems
around the world and makes monthly estimates of key carbon and nitrogen
fluxes. The predicted uptake of CO2 by
land ecosystems feeds back into the chemistry submodel, and predicted soil
compositions become inputs for the Natural Emissions Model.
The IGSM thus simulates all the relevant processes and feedbacks among
them. And it can do so quickly--an important feature for scientific studies
and policy assessments, which may require repeated runs using different
variables and simulating extended periods of time. A traditional model
may take months even on a supercomputer to simulate climate change over
a century. The IGSM incorporates carefully chosen simplifications that
make it much faster. For example, in initial tests the coupled chemistry/climate
model--which considers latitude and altitude but not longitude--performed
simulations twenty times faster than did more complicated models that also
consider longitude. Yet the climate change patterns predicted by the two
types of models were similar. And despite the simplifications, the coupled
chemistry/climate model reproduces the major features of today's climate
reasonably well, including seasonal variations.
Already the researchers have identified some feedbacks that have important
impacts but are not addressed by other models designed for policy studies.
The researchers have also begun examining sources of uncertainty
by performing a series of sensitivity studies. For example, they have tested
the effects of using different values for input parameters influencing
three key components of climate change: anthropogenic emissions, ocean
circulation, and climate sensitivity. All three are potentially important
but not well understood. The level of anthropogenic emissions depends on
hard-to-predict factors such as population growth and technological change.
The behavior of the ocean is not well understood, yet the rate at which
surface waters circulate to the ocean depths is critical. The more rapid
the circulation, the more quickly heat and CO2
will be removed from the atmosphere, slowing warming. The third parameter--climate
sensitivity--indicates how much warming will occur for given levels of CO2
and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. One of the most uncertain
factors affecting climate sensitivity is cloud cover. Clouds reflect incoming
sunlight, so their presence lowers the temperature. But they also redirect
outgoing infrared radiation back to the earth's surface, thereby raising
the temperature. The net impact is highly uncertain.
The figure below shows the effect on temperature predictions of using different
"reasonable" assumptions about the underlying input parameters.
The middle curve--the reference case--represents the outcome using assumptions
consistent with estimates from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC). The higher curve reflects a carbon-intense world, a slowly overturning
ocean, and high positive feedback because of water vapor and cloud behavior.
The lower curve reflects a cleaner world, a faster ocean overturn, and
lower cloud feedback. The amount of temperature change predicted for the
year 2100 varies from a little over 1°C to about 5°C--at the high
end, enough to raise sea level significantly, to shift agricultural regions,
and to cause other ecological and economic changes. The IPCC recently provided
a range of estimates of temperature predictions from 1°C to 3.5°C
by 2100. But that summary was based on a compilation of results from a
variety of climate change models. If the results from a single model--the
IGSM--can vary by that much and more, the IPCC range is apt to be too narrow.
The researchers are now continuing to refine the IGSM. They are improving its ability to track factors such as energy prices, resource depletion, and levels of stratospheric ozone (another greenhouse gas). They are developing a model that can predict future distributions of potential croplands under various climate-change scenarios. They are modifying the submodel for terrestrial ecosystems so it can operate simultaneously and interactively with the chemistry/climate model (rather than iteratively, as it has in the past). And they are examining the costs and impacts of proposed policy options such as restricting emissions and stabilizing atmospheric concentrations of CO2 at particular levels. New work focuses on the potential impact on global warming of proposed restrictions on SOX emissions aimed at reducing local and regional air pollution. Coal-burning electric utilities may use scrubbers to remove SOX from their stack gases yet leave levels of CO2 emissions unchanged. In the absence of the cooling aerosols, any potential global warming will progress more quickly. Using the IGSM, researchers are quantifying such effects so that policymakers can assess the trade-offs involved when considering potentially conflicting local, regional, and global policies.
This research was supported through the MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change by the US Department of Energy, the National Science Foundation, the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the Royal Norwegian Ministries of Industry and Energy and Foreign Affairs, and a group of corporate sponsors from the United States, Europe, and Japan. Further information can be found in the following references.