FAQ
Questions
about Strong Stuff: How effective is Viagra?
1. Why did you assume
that 25% of Viagra users who gained no physical benefit from the
drug nonetheless perceived that it helped them?
The controlled trials indicated that 25% of those who took sugar
pills reported improvement in sexual function. For those who did
not physically benefit from Viagra, the drug effectively functioned
as a sugar pill. It is reasonable to infer that the rate at which
they reported improvement was the same as for actual sugar pill
users, namely, 25%.
2. Why say that Viagra
has a 73% success rate rather than 80%? Even if 7% of users benefited
psychologically rather than physically, should they be counted as
having gained from Viagra?
Interesting point, but it is possible that psychological benefits,
unlike physical benefits, might prove temporary. One could say that
73% is a conservative estimate of the success rate, and that an
estimate between 73% and 80% could also be defended.
3. Didnt FDA
rules require Pfizer to report the results of the controlled experiment
as it did (4/5 vs. 1/4)?
I have been told that this is the case. But perhaps Pfizer could
have added some supplementary text indicating that, based on all
the test results, an estimated 73% of users benefited physically,
and another 7% either benefited from mind over matter
or got better on their own.
-What is the placebo
effect?
-How is the placebo effect calculated?
|