The Net Advance of Physics: Gamma-Ray Pulsar Emission Models, by Alice K. Harding -- Section 2.
Next: Polar Cap Models
Up: Gamma-Ray Pulsar Emission Models
Previous: Introduction
There are several patterns and correlations that show up in recent CGRO data
which the existing models must be able to explain (see the review
by Thompson (1996) for a more complete discussion of the observations).
Briefly, these are:
2) The spectral hardness shows a systematic variation through the
profile that is a maximum in the bridge region (Fierro et al. 1996).
3) The hardness of the phase-averaged spectrum increases with age (i.e.
4) All pulsars show high energy breaks or cutoffs in their spectrum
(Nel & DeJager 1995).
5) There is a correlation between misfits and
lack of pattern. Except for the Crab, where there is almost complete
alignment of the pulse phase across all wavelengths, there is no
alignment of the light curves at other
wavebands. All of the spectral cutoffs occur above 1 GeV, except in
PSR1509-58, where the cutoff occurs between 4 and 30 MeV.
PSR0656+14 is the one
exception to the only
Next: Polar Cap Models
Up: Gamma-Ray Pulsar Emission Models
Previous: Introduction
Observed Patterns
1) Light curves having double peaks (most widely separated) with bridge
emission are common.
Despite these remarkable regularities, there are some puzzling (Thompson et al. 1994).
-ray luminosity and polar-cap
current (or open field-line voltage)
.
-ray pulses with the
-ray luminosity-polar cap current correlation.
Geminga is the
-ray pulsar that is not a radio pulsar.
BIBLIOGRAPHY