The Net Advance of Physics: Gamma-Ray Pulsar Emission Models, by Alice K. Harding -- Section 2.
Next: Polar Cap Models
Up: Gamma-Ray Pulsar Emission Models
Previous: Introduction
There are several patterns and correlations that show up in recent CGRO data
which the existing models must be able to explain (see the review
by Thompson (1996) for a more complete discussion of the observations).
Briefly, these are:
2) The spectral hardness shows a systematic variation through the
profile that is a maximum in the bridge region (Fierro et al. 1996).
3) The hardness of the phase-averaged spectrum increases with age (i.e.
(Thompson et al. 1994).
4) All pulsars show high energy breaks or cutoffs in their spectrum
(Nel & DeJager 1995).
5) There is a correlation between -ray luminosity and polar-cap
current (or open field-line voltage) .
misfits and
lack of pattern. Except for the Crab, where there is almost complete
alignment of the pulse phase across all wavelengths, there is no
alignment of the -ray pulses with the light curves at other
wavebands. All of the spectral cutoffs occur above 1 GeV, except in
PSR1509-58, where the cutoff occurs between 4 and 30 MeV.
PSR0656+14 is the one
exception to the -ray luminosity-polar cap current correlation.
Geminga is the only -ray pulsar that is not a radio pulsar.
Next: Polar Cap Models
Up: Gamma-Ray Pulsar Emission Models
Previous: Introduction
Observed Patterns
1) Light curves having double peaks (most widely separated) with bridge
emission are common.
Despite these remarkable regularities, there are some puzzling
BIBLIOGRAPHY