ARSENIC TECHNOLOGIES |
Please select a topic from the drop-down menu: Arsenic has been long known as a poison. Exposure to arsenic via drinking water initially causes skin diseases such as pigmentation (dark and light spots on the skin) and arsenicosis (hardening of skin on hands and feets). Later, cancer of the skin, lungs, bladder, and kidney may occur . Unfortunately, there is no cure for these diseases. Both the World Health Organization (WHO) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) have classified arsenic as a carcinogen. In some parts of Bangladesh, West Bengal, and Nepal, the arsenic level in the groundwater can be over 100 times higher than the WHO and EPA guidelines of 10 ug/L. Back to the top. |
Removal
Technologies
Numerous
arsenic removal technologies have been developed by universities,
government organizations, groups, and the private sector. These
technologies can be classified into 9 general categories based on
the dominant removal process (although sometimes, a given technology
may make use of multiple treatment processes). Back to the top. |
Of the two predominant forms of arsenic in water, arsenate and arsenite, most treatment processes are effective at removing arsenate, but not arsenite, since arsenite is typically non-charged below pH 9.2. Therefore, treatment for the removal of arsenic often includes an oxidation step to convert arsenite to arsenate. Oxidation
can be simply the addition of oxygen to a compound, or more generally,
any reaction involving the loss of electrons from an atom. Aeration,
the supplying Oxidation alone does not remove arsenic from solution but must be combined with an arsenic removal process. Back to the top. |
Coagulation
encompasses all reactions, mechanisms and results in the overall
process of particle growth (floc formation) and particle aggregation
within a water Chemical
precipitation is the process by which dissolved ions in solution
form an insoluble solid via a chemical reaction. For example, naturally
occurring dissolved iron in groundwater, when exposed to oxygen,
forms a precipitate. Co-precipitation occurs when an inorganic contaminant
forms an insoluble complex with the There are 4 types of co-precipitation:
Coagulation
converts soluble arsenic into insoluble reaction products, allowing
separation by sedimentation and/or filtration. Factors affecting
arsenic removal by Three mechanisms are potentially involved in arsenic removal:
Direct precipitation plays the least important role in arsenic removal, however, co-precipitation and adsorption are both active arsenic removal mechanisms (Johnston and Heijnen, 2001) Soon Kyu (Jeff) Hwang evaluated the arsenic removal performance of ENPHO's Two-Kolshi Arsenic Removal System, which is based on coagulation and filtration processes. For more information, please see Jeff's thesis (2002). Georges Tabbal compared technical performance and social acceptance of three arsenic removal technologies in Nepal, including the Two-Kolshi System. For more information, please see Georges' thesis (2003). Source: Johnston, R. and Heijnen, H. 2001. “Safe Water Technology for Arsenic Removal.” In: Ahmed, M.F. et. al. [Eds]. Technologies for Arsenic Removal from Drinking Water. Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka. Bangladesh Back to the top. |
Sedimentation is the gravity separation of solids from liquid by settling. It is generally used in conjunction with precipitation or coagulation. Back to the top. |
Conventional
filtration is the separation of solid particles from water by passing
the solution through a medium. Particles are removed during filtration
as a result of Common particulates removed by filtration include silt, clay, colloidal and precipitated natural organic matter, naturally-occurring iron and manganese precipitates, precipitates from metal salt or polymer coagulation, microorganisms. Filters may be classified in various ways, according to the type of granular medium used, by the hydraulic system (e.g. gravity, up-flow, etc.), rate of filtration, and/or by the location of particle accumulation (e.g. cake filtration, depth filtration). Soon Kyu (Jeff) Hwang evaluated the arsenic removal performance of ENPHO's Two-Kolshi Arsenic Removal System, which is based on coagulation and filtration processes. For more information, please see Jeff's thesis (2002). Back to the top. |
Adsorption is the accumulation of materials at an interface, the liquid/solid boundary layer. It is a mass transfer process where a substance is transferred from the liquid phase to the surface of a solid and becomes bound by chemical or physical forces. Adsorption can take place on suspended particles, as part of the process of coagulation/co-precipitation, or on fixed media. Since adsorption is a surface phenomenon, the greater the surface area of the medium, the greater it’s capacity to accumulate material. Each adsorbent medium has different associated properties, performances and costs. Arsenic is adsorbed onto the surface of various granular, activated, clay and celluosic adsorbents, including:
Jessica Hurd evaluated the arsenic removal performance of three adsorption media, including iron filings (3-Kolshi Filter and Jerry Can Filter) and activated alumina (Apryon Filter). For more information, please see Jessica's thesis (2001). Barika Poole evaluated the arsenic adsorption performance of several types of iron oxide-coated sands. For more information, please see Barika's thesis (2001). Tommy Ngai evaluated the arsenic adsorption performance of an activated-alumina-based manganese oxide media. For more information, please see Tommy's thesis (2001). Tommy Ngai and Sophie Walewijk also designed and evaluated the Arsenic Biosand Filter (ABF). The dominant arsenic removal process for this filter is adsoprtion to iron nails. Refer to their report for more details (2003). Georges Tabbal compared technical performance and social acceptance of three arsenic removal technologies in Nepal, including the Two-Kolshi System and the ABF. For more information, please see Georges' thesis (2003). Also refer to the World Bank Project section for additional information on the ABF. Back
to the top. |
Ion exchange is the reversible interchange of ions between the solid and the liquid phase where there is no permanent change in the structure of the solid. Developed for large-scale applications, ion exchange is probably not appropriate for small hand?pumped wells, but could potentially be used on a village scale in Bangladesh. Synthetic ion exchange resins are based on a cross-linked polymer matrix, typically composed of polystyrene cross-linked with vinylbenzene. Charged functional groups are attached to the matrix through covalent bonding and fall into four groups (Clifford, 1999).
Various strong base anion exchange resins are commercially available that can effectively remove arsenate from water, producing effluents with less than 1 ug/L arsenic. Arsenite, being uncharged, is not removed, unless an oxidation step to convert arsenite to arsenate is included in the process. Conventional sulfate-selective resins are particularly suited for arsenate removal. Nitrate-selective resins also remove arsenic, but arsenic breakthrough occurs earlier. Ion exchangers are typically down-flow, packed bed columns with ion exchange resin beads pre-saturated with an exchangeable ion. Source water is passed through the packed bed until the appearance of the unwanted contaminant in the effluent. At this stage, the ion exchange media is reactivated with a regenerant solution and rinsed with water in preparation for another treatment cycle. Both the redox potential and pH are important factors with regard to arsenic removal by ion exchange. Tommy Ngai used Bio-Rad Laboratories AG1-X8 Strong Ion Exchange Resin to separate arsenite from arsenate in arsenic-containing groundwater in Nepal. Of the 40+ tubewell water surveyed, arsenite was found to be the dominant inorganic species, representating approximately 79% of all inorganic arsenic. For more information, please refer to Tommy's thesis (2001). Source:
M. Davis and D. Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental Engineering.
McGraw-Hill. New York, 1991. p.277. Back to the top. |
Membrane separation uses semi-permeable membranes that are selectively permeable to water and certain solutes to separate impurities from water. Membranes are able to remove many different kinds of dissolved solids, including arsenic, from water. However, they are usually expensive and therefore are typically considered in applications such as desalination, brackish water conversion and for removal of specific ions, such as arsenic, that are difficult to remove by other means. There are many different membrane alternatives including microfiltration, reverse osmosis, electrodialysis, ultrafiltration and nanofiltration. Membrane process treatment performance is dependent on the quality of the feed water and the desired quality of the product water. Generally the more contaminated the feed water and the higher the desired product water quality, the greater the likelihood of membrane fouling caused by particulate matter, scaling and biofouling. Source: S. Kawamura. Integrated Design of Water Treatment Facilities. John Wiley & Sons Inc. New York, 1991. p.556. Back to the top. |
Biological treatment transforms, stabilizes and/or removes arsenic by means of microorganisms. Microorganisms, primarily certain specific bacteria, accomplish this by oxidation/reduction, mineralization, detoxification or methylation. Critical factors include energy and carbon source; aerobic, anoxic or anaerobic conditions; temperature;pH. Back to the top. |
Other methods in providing arsenic-free drinking include:
Solar distillation uses the sun's energy to evaporate water, which then recondenses. The process of evaporation and recondensation separates all chemicals, including arsenic, from the water. In Bangladesh, where solar energy is plentiful, this approach may be especially suited for application in crisis areas, and, if cost-effective approaches can be developed, in rural areas generally. Back to the top. |
Related Documents
Evaluation of 8 arsenic removal technologies in Nepal (Abstract) MIT Nepal Water Project:Development of Arsenic Remediation Technologies from 1999-2003 Back to the top. |