There are two points of view for formulating a theory of
electrodynamics. The older one views the forces of
attraction or repulsion between two charges or currents as the
result of action at a distance. Coulomb's law of electrostatics and
the corresponding law of magnetostatics were first stated in this
fashion. Faraday[1] introduced a new approach in which he envisioned
the space between interacting charges to be filled with fields, by
which the space is activated in a certain sense; forces between two
interacting charges are then transferred, in Faraday's view, from
volume element to volume element in the space between the interacting
bodies until finally they are transferred from one charge to the
other. The advantage of Faraday's approach was that it brought to
bear on the electromagnetic problem the then well-developed theory of
continuum mechanics. The culmination of this point of view was
Maxwell's formulation[2] of the equations named after him.
From Faraday's point of view, electric and magnetic fields are
defined at a point r even when there is no charge present there.
The fields are defined in terms of the force that would be exerted on
a test charge q if it were introduced at r moving at a
velocity v at the time of interest. It is found experimentally
that such a force would be composed of two parts, one that is
independent of v, and the other proportional to v and
orthogonal to it. The force is summarized in terms of the
electric field intensity E and magnetic flux density
oH by the Lorentz force law. (For a review of vector
operations, see Appendix 1.)
Figure 1.1.1 Lorentz force f in geometric relation to the electric and magnetic field intensities, E and H, and the charge velocity v: (a) electric force, (b) magnetic force, and (c) total force.
The superposition of electric and magnetic force contributions to
(1) is illustrated in Fig. 1.1.1. Included in the figure is a
reminder of the right-hand rule used to determine the direction of the
cross-product of v and
o H. In general, E and H
are not uniform, but rather are functions of position r and time
t: E = E (r, t) and
oH =
oH
(r, t).
In addition to the units of length, mass, and time associated
with mechanics, a unit of charge is required by the theory of
electrodynamics. This unit is the coulomb. The Lorentz force law,
(1), then serves to define the units of E and of
oH.
We can only establish the units of the magnetic flux density
oH from the force law and cannot argue until Sec. 1.4 that
the derived units of H are ampere/meter and hence of
o are
henry/meter.
In much of electrodynamics, the predominant concern is not with
mechanics but with electric and magnetic fields in their own right.
Therefore, it is inconvenient to use the unit of mass when checking
the units of quantities. It proves useful to introduce a new name
for the unit of electric field intensity- the unit of volt/meter.
In the summary of variables given in Table 1.8.2 at the end of
the chapter, the fundamental units are SI, while the derived units
exploit the fact that the unit of mass, kilogram =
volt-coulomb-second2/meter2 and also that a coulomb/second = ampere.
Dimensional checking of equations is guaranteed if the basic units are
used, but may often be accomplished using the derived units. The
latter communicate the physical nature of the variable and the natural
symmetry of the electric and magnetic variables.
Example 1.1.1. Electron Motion in Vacuum in a Uniform
Static Electric Field
In vacuum, the motion of a charged particle is limited only by
its own inertia. In the uniform electric field illustrated in
Fig. 1.1.2, there is no magnetic field, and an electron starts out
from the plane x = 0 with an initial velocity vi.
Figure 1.1.2 An electron, subject to the uniform electric field intensity Ex, has the position
x, shown as a function of time for positive and negative fields.
The "imposed" electric
field is E = ix Ex, where ix is the unit vector in the x
direction and Ex is a given constant. The trajectory is to
be determined here and used to exemplify the charge and current
density in Example 1.2.1.
With m defined as the electron mass, Newton's law combines
with the Lorentz law to describe the motion.
The electron position
x is shown in Fig. 1.1.2. The charge of
the electron is customarily denoted by e (e = 1.6 x 10-19
coulomb) where e is positive, thus necessitating an
explicit minus sign in (4).
By integrating twice, we get
where c1 and c2 are integration constants. If we assume that
the electron is at
x = 0 and has velocity vi
when t = ti, it follows that these constants are
Thus, the electron position and velocity are given as a function of
time by
With x defined as upward and Ex > 0, the motion of an electron
in an electric field is analogous to the free fall of a mass in a
gravitational field, as illustrated by Fig. 1.1.2. With Ex < 0,
and the initial velocity also positive, the velocity is a
monotonically increasing function of time, as also illustrated by
Fig. 1.1.2.
Example 1.1.2. Electron Motion in Vacuum in a Uniform
Static Magnetic Field
The magnetic contribution to the Lorentz force is perpendicular
to both the particle velocity and the imposed field. We illustrate
this fact by considering the trajectory resulting from an initial
velocity viz along the z axis. With a uniform constant
magnetic flux density
oH
existing along the y axis, the force is
The cross-product of two vectors is perpendicular to the two vector
factors, so the acceleration of the electron, caused by the magnetic
field, is always perpendicular to its velocity. Therefore, a magnetic
field alone cannot change the magnitude of the electron velocity (and
hence the kinetic energy of the electron) but can change only the
direction of the velocity. Because the magnetic field is uniform,
because the velocity and the rate of change of the velocity lie in a
plane perpendicular to the magnetic field, and, finally, because the
magnitude of v does not change, we find that the acceleration has a
constant magnitude and is orthogonal to both the velocity and the
magnetic field. The electron moves in a circle so that the
centrifugal force counterbalances the magnetic force. Figure 1.1.3a
illustrates the motion. The radius of the circle is determined by
equating the centrifugal force and radial Lorentz force
Figure 1.1.3 (a) In a uniform magnetic flux density
oHo and with no initial velocity in the y direction, an electron has a circular orbit. (b) With an initial velocity in the y direction, the orbit is helical.
which leads to
The foregoing problem can be modified to account for any
arbitrary initial angle between the velocity and the magnetic field.
The vector equation of motion (really three equations in the three
unknowns
x,
y,
z)
is linear in
, and so solutions can be superimposed to satisfy
initial conditions that include not only a velocity viz but one in
the y direction as well, viy. Motion in the same direction as the
magnetic field does not give rise to an additional force. Thus,
the y component of (12) is zero on the right. An integration
then shows that the y directed velocity remains constant at its
initial value, viy. This uniform motion can be added to that
already obtained to see that the electron follows a helical path, as
shown in Fig. 1.1.3b.
It is interesting to note that the angular frequency of
rotation of the electron around the field is independent of the
speed of the electron and depends only upon the magnetic flux
density,
o Ho. Indeed, from (11) we find
For a flux density of 1 volt-second/meter (or 1 tesla), the
cyclotron frequency is fc =
c/2
= 28 GHz. (For
an electron, e = 1.602 x 10-19 coulomb and m = 9.106
x 10-31 kg.) With an initial velocity in the z direction
of 3 x 107 m/s, the radius of gyration in the flux density
o H = 1 tesla is r = viz/
c = 1.7 x
10-4 m.