In Maxwell's day, it was not known that charges are not
infinitely divisible but occur in elementary units of 1.6 x
10-19
coulomb, the charge of an electron. Hence, Maxwell's macroscopic theory
deals with continuous charge distributions. This is an adequate
description for fields of engineering interest that are produced by
aggregates of large numbers of elementary charges. These aggregates
produce charge distributions that are described conveniently in terms
of a charge per unit volume, a charge density
.
Pick an incremental volume and determine the net charge within.
Then
is the charge density at the position r when the time is t.
The units of
are coulomb/meter3. The volume
V is
chosen small as compared to the dimensions of the system of interest,
but large enough so as to contain many elementary charges. The charge
density
is treated as a continuous function of position. The
"graininess" of the charge distribution is ignored in such a
"macroscopic" treatment.
Fundamentally, current is charge transport and connotes the time
rate of change of charge. Current density is a directed current per
unit area and hence measured in (coulomb/second)/meter2. A
charge density
moving at a velocity v implies a rate of
charge transport per unit area, a current density J, given by
Figure 1.2.1 Current density J passing through surface having a normal n
One way to envision this relation is shown in Fig. 1.2.1,
where a charge density
having velocity v traverses a differential area
a. The area element has a unit normal n, so that a differential
area vector can be defined as
a = n
a. The
charge that passes during a differential time
t is equal to
the total charge contained in the volume v
a dt.
Therefore,
Divided by dt,
we expect (3) to take the form J
a, so it
follows that the current density is related to the charge density by
(2).
The velocity v is the velocity of the charge. Just how the
charge is set into motion depends on the physical situation. The
charge might be suspended in or on an insulating material which is
itself in motion. In that case, the velocity would also be that of
the material. More likely, it is the result of applying an electric
field to a conductor, as considered in Chap. 7. For charged particles
moving in vacuum, it might result from motions represented by the laws
of Newton and Lorentz, as illustrated in the examples in Sec.1.1. This
is the case in the following example.
Example 1.2.1. Charge and Current Densities in a Vacuum Diode
Consider the charge and current densities for electrons being
emitted with initial velocity v from a "cathode" in the plane x
= 0,
as shown in Fig. 1.2.2a.
1 Here we picture the field
variables Ex, vx, and
as though they were positive. For
electrons,
< 0, and to make vx > 0, we must have Ex < 0.
Figure 1.2.2 Charge injected at the lower
boundary is accelerated upward by an electric field. Vertical
distributions of (a) field intensity, (b) velocity and (c) charge
density.
Electrons are
continuously injected. As in Example 1.1.1, where the motions of the
individual electrons are considered, the electric field is assumed to
be uniform. In the next section, it is recognized that charge is the
source of the electric field. Here it is assumed that the charge
used to impose the uniform field is much greater than the "space
charge" associated with the electrons. This is
justified in the limit of a low electron current. Any one of the
electrons has a position and velocity given by (1.1.7) and (1.1.8).
If each is injected with the same initial velocity, the charge and
current densities in any given plane x = constant would be expected to
be independent of time. Moreover, the current passing any x-plane
should be the same as that passing any other such plane. That is, in
the steady state, the current density is independent of not only time
but x as well. Thus, it is possible to write
where Jo is a given current density.
The following steps illustrate how this condition of current
continuity makes it possible to shift from a description of the
particle motions described with time as the independent variable to
one in which coordinates (x, y, z) (or for short r) are
the independent
coordinates. The relation between time and position for the electron
described by (1.1.7) takes the form of a quadratic in (t - ti)
This can be solved to give the elapsed time for a particle to reach
the position
x. Note that of the two possible solutions to (5),
the one selected satisfies the condition that when t = ti,
x = 0.
With the benefit of this expression, the velocity given by (1.1.8) is
written as
Now we make a shift in viewpoint. On the left in (7) is the
velocity vx of the particle that is at the location
x = x.
Substitution of variables then gives
so that x becomes the independent variable used to express the
dependent variable vx. It follows from this expression and (4)
that the charge density
is also expressed as a function of x. In the plots shown in
Fig. 1.2.2, it is assumed that Ex < 0, so that the electrons have
velocities that increase monotonically with x. As should be
expected, the charge density decreases with x because as they speed
up, the electrons thin out to keep the current density constant.