The Lorentz force law of Sec. 1.1 expresses the effect of
electromagnetic fields on a moving charge. The remaining sections in
this chapter are concerned with the reaction of the moving charges
upon the electromagnetic fields. The first of Maxwell's equations to
be considered, Gauss' law, describes how the electric field
intensity is related to its source. The net charge within an arbitrary
volume V that is enclosed by a surface S is related to the net
electric flux through that surface by
With the surface normal defined as directed outward, the volume is
shown in Fig. 1.3.1. Here the permittivity of free space,
o
= 8.854 x 10-12 farad/meter, is an empirical constant needed
to express Maxwell's equations in SI units. On the right in (1) is
the net charge enclosed by the surface S. On the left is the
summation over this same closed surface of the differential
contributions of flux
o E
da. The quantity
o
E is called the electric displacement flux density and,
[from (1)], has the units of coulomb/meter2. Out of any region
containing net charge, there must be a net displacement flux.
The following example illustrates the mechanics of carrying out
the volume and surface integrations.
Given the charge and current distributions, the integral laws
fully determine the electric and magnetic fields. However, they are
not directly useful unless there is a great deal of symmetry. An
example is the distribution of charge density
in the spherical coordinate system of Fig. 1.3.2. Here
o and
R are given constants. An argument based on the spherical symmetry
shows that the only possible component of E is radial.
Figure 1.3.2 (a) Spherically symmetric charge
distribution, showing radial dependence of charge density and
associated radial electric field intensity. (b) Axis of rotation for
demonstration that the components of E transverse to the radial
coordinate are zero.
Indeed, suppose that in addition to this r component the field
possesses a
component. At a given point, the components of
E then
appear as shown in Fig. 1.3.2b. Rotation of the system about the
axis shown results in a component of E in some new direction
perpendicular to r. However, the rotation leaves the source of that
field, the charge distribution, unaltered. It follows that E
must be zero. A similar argument shows that E
also is zero.
The incremental volume element is
and it follows that for a spherical volume having arbitrary radius r,
To evaluate the left-hand side of (1), note that
Thus, for the spherical surface at the arbitrary radius r,
With the volume and surface integrals evaluated in (5) and
(7), Gauss' law, (l), shows that
Inside the spherical charged region, the radial electric field
increases with the square of the radius because even though the
associated surface
increases like the square of the radius, the enclosed charge increases
even more rapidly. Figure 1.3.2 illustrates this dependence, as well
as the exterior field decay. Outside, the surface area continues to
increase in proportion to r2, but the enclosed charge remains constant.
Examples of singular functions from
circuit theory are impulse and step functions. Because there is only
the one independent variable, namely time, circuit theory is
concerned with
only one "dimension." In three-dimensional field theory, there are
three spatial analogues of the temporal impulse function. These are
point, line, and surface distributions of
, as illustrated in
Fig. 1.3.3. Like the temporal impulse function of circuit theory,
these singular distributions are defined in terms of integrals.
Figure 1.3.3 Singular charge distributions: (a)
point charge, (b) line charge, (c) surface charge.
A point charge is the limit of an infinite charge density
occupying zero volume. With q defined as the net charge,
the point charge can be pictured as a small charge-filled region,
the outside of which is charge free. An example is given in Fig. 1.3.2
in the limit where the volume 4
R3 /3 goes to zero, while q =

o R3 remains finite.
A line charge density represents a two-dimensional singularity in
charge density. It is the mathematical abstraction representing a thin
charge filament. In terms of the filamentary volume shown in
Fig. 1.3.4, the line charge per unit length
l (the line
charge density) is defined as the limit where the cross-sectional
area of the volume goes to zero,
goes to infinity, but the
integral
Figure 1.3.4 Filamentary volume
element having cross-section da used to define line charge
density.
remains finite. In general,
l is a function of position along the
curve.
The one-dimensional singularity in charge density is represented
by the surface charge density. The charge density is very large in
the vicinity of a surface. Thus, as a function of a coordinate
perpendicular to that surface, the charge density is a one-dimensional
impulse function. To define the surface charge density, mount a
pillbox as shown in Fig. 1.3.5 so that its top and bottom surfaces are
on the two sides of the surface. The surface charge density is then
defined as the limit
Figure 1.3.5 Volume element having thickness h used to define surface charge density.
Figure 1. Point charge q at origin of spherical coordinate
system.
where the
coordinate is picked parallel to the direction of the
normal to the surface, n. In general, the surface charge density
s is a function of position in the surface.
Illustration. Field of a Point Charge
A point charge q is located at the origin in Fig. 1.3.6.
There are no other charges. By the same arguments as used in Example
1.3.1, the spherical symmetry of the charge
distribution requires that the electric field be radial and be
independent of
and
. Evaluation of the surface
integral in Gauss'
integral law, (1), amounts to multiplying
o Er by the surface
area.
Because all of the charge is concentrated at the origin, the volume
integral gives q, regardless of radial position of the surface S.
Thus,
is the electric field associated with a point charge q.
Illustration. The Field Associated with Straight Uniform Line Charge
A uniform line charge is distributed along the z axis from z =
-
to z = +\infty,
as shown in Fig. 1.3.7. For an observer at the radius r, translation
of the line source in the z direction and rotation of the source about
the z axis (in the
direction) results in the same charge
distribution, so the electric field must only depend on r. Moreover,
E can only have a radial component. To see this, suppose that there
were a z component of E. Then a 180 degree rotation of the
system about an
axis perpendicular to and passing through the z axis must reverse this
field. However, the rotation leaves the charge distribution unchanged.
The contradiction is resolved only if Ez = 0. The same rotation makes
it clear that E
must be zero.
Figure 1.3.7 Uniform line charge
distributed from - infinity to + infinity along z axis.
Rotation by 180 degrees about axis shown leads to conclusion that
electric field is radial.
This time, Gauss' integral law is applied using for S the surface
of a right circular cylinder coaxial with the z axis and of arbitrary
radius r. Contributions from the ends are zero because there the
surface
normal is perpendicular to E. With the cylinder taken as having
length l, the surface integration amounts to a multiplication of
o Er by the surface area 2
rl while, the volume integral
gives l
l regardless of the radius r. Thus, (1) becomes
for the field of an infinitely long uniform line charge having density
l.
Example 1.3.2. The Field of a Pair of Equal and Opposite Infinite
Planar Charge Densities
Consider the field produced by a surface charge density +
o
occupying all the x-y plane at z = s/2 and an opposite surface
charge density -
o at z = -s/2.
First, the field must be z directed. Indeed there cannot be a
component of E transverse to the z axis, because rotation of the
system around the z axis leaves the same source distribution while
rotating that component of E. Hence, no such component exists.
Figure 1.3.8 Sheets of surface charge and volume of
integration with upper surface at arbitrary position x. With field Eo due to external charges equal to zero, the distribution of electric field is the discontinuous function shown at right.
Because the source distribution is independent of x and y, Ez is
independent of these coordinates. The z dependence is now established
by means of Gauss' integral law, (1). The volume of integration,
shown in Fig. 1.3.8, has cross-sectional area A in the x-y plane. Its
lower surface is located at an arbitrary fixed location below the
lower surface charge distribution, while its upper surface is in the
plane denoted by z. For now, we take Ez as being Eo on the lower
surface. There is no contribution to the surface integral from the
side walls because these have normals perpendicular to E. It follows
that Gauss' law, (1), becomes
That is, with the upper surface below the lower charge sheet, no
charge is enclosed by the surface of integration, and Ez is the
constant Eo. With the upper surface of integration between the charge
sheets, Ez is Eo minus
o/
o.
Finally, with the upper integration
surface above the upper charge sheet, Ez returns to its value of Eo.
The external electric field Eo must be created by charges at z =
+
,
much as the field between the charge sheets is created by the given
surface charges. Thus, if these charges at "infinity" are absent,
Eo = 0, and the distribution of Ez is as shown to the right in
Fig. 1.3.8.
Illustration. Coulomb's Force Law for Point Charges
It is worthwhile to see that
for charges at rest, Gauss' integral law and the Lorentz
force law give the familiar action at a distance force law. The force
on a charge q is given by the Lorentz law, (1.1.1), and if the
electric field is caused by a second charge at the origin in
Fig. 1.3.9, then
Figure 1.3.9. Coulomb force induced on
charge q2 due to field from q1.
Coulomb's famous statement that the force exerted by one charge on
another is proportional to the product of their charges, acts along a
line passing through each charge, and is inversely proportional to the
square of the distance between them, is now demonstrated.
The charge resulting on the surface of adhesive tape as it is
pulled from a dispenser is a common nuisance. As the tape is brought
toward a piece of paper, the force of attraction that makes the paper
jump is an aggravating reminder that there are charges on the tape.
Just how much charge there is on the tape can be approximately
determined by means of the simple experiment shown in Fig. 1.3.10.
Figure 1.3.10. Like-charged particles on ends
of thread are pushed apart by the Coulomb force.
Two pieces of freshly pulled tape about 7 cm long are folded up
into balls and stuck on the ends of a thread having a total length
of about 20 cm. The middle of the thread is then tied up so that the
charged balls of tape are suspended free to swing. (By electrostatic
standards, our fingers are conductors, so the tape should be
manipulated chopstick fashion by means of plastic rods or the like.)
It is then easy to measure approximately l and r, as defined in the
figure. The force of repulsion that separates the "balls" of tape is
presumably predicted by (15). In Fig. 1.3.10, the vertical component
of the tension in the thread must balance the gravitational force Mg
(where g is the gravitational acceleration and M is the mass). It
follows that the horizontal component of the thread tension balances
the Coulomb force of repulsion.
As an example, tape balls having an area of A = 14 cm2, (7 cm
length of 2 cm wide tape) weighing 0.1 mg and dangling at a length l =
20 cm result in a distance of separation r = 3 cm. It follows from
(16) (with all quantities expressed in SI units) that q = 2.7 x
10-9 coulomb. Thus, the average surface charge density is q/A =
1.9 x 10-6 coulomb/meter or 1.2 x 1013 electronic
charges per square meter. If these charges were in a square array
with spacing s between charges, then
s = e/s2, and it
follows that the approximate distance between the individual charge in
the tape surface is 0.3
m. This length is at the limit of an
optical microscope and may seem small. However, it is about 1000
times larger than a typical atomic dimension.
Each of the integral laws summarized in this
chapter implies a relationship between field variables evaluated on
either side of a surface. These conditions are necessary for dealing
with surface singularities in the field sources. Example 1.3.2
illustrates the jump in the normal component of E that accompanies a
surface charge.
A surface that supports surface charge is pictured in
Fig. 1.3.11, as having a unit normal vector directed from region (b) to
region (a). The volume to which Gauss' integral law is applied has the
pillbox shape shown, with endfaces of area A on opposite sides of the
surface. These are assumed to be small enough so that over the area
of interest the surface can be treated as plane. The height h of the
pillbox is very small so that the cylindrical sideface of the pillbox
has an area much smaller than A.
Figure 1.3.11. Pillbox-shaped
incremental volume used to deduce the jump condition implied by
Gauss' integral law.
Now, let h approach zero in such a way that the two sides of the
pillbox remain on opposite sides of the surface. The volume integral
of the charge density, on the right in (1), gives A
s.
This follows
from the definition of the surface charge density, (11). The
electric field is assumed to be finite throughout the region of the
surface. Hence, as the area of the sideface shrinks to zero, so also
does the contribution of the sideface to the surface integral. Thus,
the displacement flux through the closed surface consists only of the
contributions from the top and bottom surfaces. Applied to the
pillbox, Gauss' integral law requires that
where the area A has been canceled from both sides of the
equation.
The contribution from the endface on side (b) comes with a minus sign
because on that surface, n is opposite in direction to the
surface element da.
Note that the field found in Example 1.3.2 satisfies this continuity
condition at z = s/2 and z = -s/2.