Now let us evaluate the third derivative
by
differentiating (6.2)
Classical differential geometry textbooks
[412,206,444,76] do not cover the case
, which is addressed below following Ye and Maekawa
[458]. When
(6.2) does not
define the unit principal normal vector. To obtain the principal
normal vector at points where
, higher order derivatives of
the curve are involved. If
, then the curve is a
straight line, and the Frenet frame of the curve is not defined. We
assume here that
occurs only at isolated points. In such
case, (2.56) is
valid. If
and
, the third order derivative
(6.4) reduces to
The evaluation of torsion when the curvature vanishes can be performed
as follows.
If
and
, we need to
evaluate the fourth order derivative of
, i.e.
. This can be obtained by
differentiating (6.5) and replacing
,
,
using the Frenet-Serret formulae which results in:
![]() |
(6.12) |
![]() |
(6.14) |
In general, if
and
, then [458]
![]() |
(6.15) |
Let
,
,
and
,
,
or in vector form,
and
, be the two parametric
surfaces. Also, let us denote the two implicit surfaces as
and
. We assume that these surfaces are
all regular. In other words
So far, we have studied the intersection
curve independent of the two intersecting surfaces. However, the
intersecting curve can also be viewed as a curve on the two intersecting
surfaces. A curve
,
in the
-plane defines a curve
on a parametric surface
, while a curve
with constraint
defines a curve on an implicit surface
.
We can easily derive the first three derivatives of the intersection
curve
,
,
as a curve on a
parametric surface using the chain rule:
Similarly we can evaluate
,
and
as follows: