|
Wax on, wax off
April 25, 2008
Dear Lucy: When I told my sister I'd had a hearing test, she asked if I'd had my ears cleaned first. I hadn't. She then wanted to know how I could have had an accurate hearing test if my ears were full of wax. So my question is this: Do you need to have your ears "cleaned" before you have a hearing test?
—Can You Hear Me Now
Dear CYHMN: This question had Lucy running for the Q-tips, which, as MIT Medical audiologist Christine Rabinowitz later told her, was exactly the wrong thing to do. "Audiologists expect to see some earwax in people's ear canals," Rabinowitz emphasizes.
"Your body makes ear wax to lubricate the ear canal and to protect your ears from damage and infection," she continues. "It
is created, sloughed off, and expelled from the ear in
an ongoing cycle. This is a natural process that is helped
along by typical washing or swimming."
Though ears are designed to be self-cleaning, ear wax can sometimes accumulate on its own, she notes. "Or sometimes people help it accumulate by using Q-tips or other devices inside their ears," she says. "And although it might look like some of the wax is coming out on the Q-tip, it's likely even more of it is being pushed in." In addition, the irritation caused by swabbing the ear canal with a Q-tip may stimulate the body to create excess new ear wax.
"There is no way to know if you have too much wax in your ears unless a healthcare provider examines your ear with an otoscope," Rabinowitz says. And, she adds, your audiologist probably looked into your ears before doing your hearing test. "I always take a look to see what is in the ear canal and to determine whether the patient is likely to have any problems using the earphones," Rabinowitz explains. "If I notice a problem, I'll send the patient to get an ear cleaning, typically done with irrigation by one of the nurses, before I perform the test."
You can inform your sister that Lucy says your hearing test was probably valid—and that your ears were probably not "full of wax." And Lucy encourages you, and all her other readers, to restrict Q-tip use to craft activities and belly-button cleaning. —Lucy
New HPV vaccine?
March 19, 2008
Dear Lucy: Do you recommend that college women who have not been sexually active take the three doses of the new Gardasil vaccine? My doctor mentioned that a more effective version of the vaccine may be released later this year, so I am wondering if I should wait for that one.
—Hurry Up & Wait
Dear Unrated: Lucy hears from a lot of undergraduate woman with questions about the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, so she's glad to have a chance to answer this one. You are probably not the only one who's heard that a new vaccine is currently being tested and has questions about it. For help in answering your question, Lucy turned to MIT Medical gynecologist Chana Wasserman, M.D.
According to Wasserman, the vaccine now being tested, Cervarix, varies from the currently available Gardasil vaccine in two ways. Both vaccinate against HPV strains 16 and 18, which cause 80 percent of all cervical cancers. Gardasil, however, also vaccinates against HPV strains 6 and 11, which cause 90 percent of the cases of genital warts and, according to recent research, it may also confer partial protection against 10 other HPV strains. But even though Cervarix doesn't protect against genital warts, it may have an advantage over Gardasil in the adjuvant, or vaccine enhancer, it uses, Wasserman notes. "Gardasil uses an aluminum salt adjuvant," she explains, "but Cervarix is using a novel adjuvant known as AS04, which leads to higher antibody levels and may provide longer-lasting protection."
As to recommendations for current action—or inaction, as the case may be—Wasserman says it depends on your level of sexual activity. "If you are currently sexually active or planning a new sexual partner, or partners, in the near future, it would be worth proceeding with the currently available vaccine in order to be protected right away," she says. On the other hand, Wasserman continues, "if you are currently in a stable relationship or not yet sexually active, it's probably worth waiting until the new vaccine completes its trials, and then see which one the CDC recommends."
In the meantime, Gardasil is currently available at MIT Medical (see http://web.mit.edu/medical/a-newsarchive.html#gardasil2), and elsewhere, and Lucy would like to remind everyone that most cases of cervical cancer can be prevented. Along with vaccination, that means regular Pap tests to detect treatable, precancerous cell changes. —Lucy
Basal Metabolic Rate?
February 22, 2008
Dear Lucy: How do I figure out my basal metabolic
rate (BMR)? When it comes to the number of calories I consume
each day, should I aim for this number to maintain my weight?
—Unrated
Dear Unrated: For help with this question, Lucy went straight to the source of all knowledge caloric and dietary: MIT Medical nutritionist Anna Jasonides, R.D.
"This is an easy question," Jasonides told Lucy happily, and immediately began scribbling mathematical formulas on a piece of scrap paper. "An individual's basal metabolic rate, or BMR, is the total number of calories required to keep the body functioning while at rest," she explained. "It's the minimum number of calories your body needs to keep your heart pumping, make new blood cells, and maintain respiration, body temperature, digestion, and other intrinsic metabolic processes and chemical reactions.
"But if you plan on getting out of bed for at least part of each day, you don't want to base your caloric intake on your BMR!" Jasonides exclaimed. "What you need to do is to figure out your BMR, and then multiply it by a number representing your level of physical activity. That result is your TDEE, or 'total daily energy expenditure'—and your TDEE is a pretty good estimate of the number of calories you should consume each day to maintain your current weight."
Jasonides explained how to figure BMR, using one of these formulas:
Women:
BMR = 655 + (4.35 x weight in pounds) + (4.7 x height in
inches) – (4.7 x age in years)
Men:
BMR = 66 + (6.23 x weight in pounds) + (12.7 x height in
inches) – (6.8 x age in years)
Then, she continued, to determine TDEE, simply multiply
your BMR by the activity factor that most closely describes
your level of daily exercise, as follows:
Exercise level |
Activity factor |
| Sedentary |
1.2 |
| Lightly active (light exercise 1–3 days/week) |
1.3.75 |
| Moderately active (moderate exercise 3–5 days/week) |
1.55 |
| Very active (hard exercise 6–7 days a week) |
1.725 |
| Extra active (very hard exercise & physical job
or 2x training |
1.9 |
So, for example, a moderately active 35-year-old woman who
weighs 140 pounds and is 5'5" inches tall would calculate
her TDEE as follows:
BMR = 655 + (4.35 x 140) + (4.7 x 65) – (4.7 x 35)
= 655 + 609 + 305.5 – 164.5
= 1405
TDEE = 1405 x 1.55 = 2117.75
In other words, this woman should consume approximately
2118 calories per day to maintain her current weight.
Jasonides emphasizes that these calculations do not yield precisely accurate results. For example, a different calculation to achieve a more exact BMR estimation can be performed based on lean body mass as opposed to total weight (that formula, for both men and women, is BMR = 370 + (9.8 x lean body mass in pounds). Also, any estimation of one's activity level is just that—an estimation. But calculating your TDEE using either BMR formula will provide you with a baseline number that can be useful in dietary planning. —Lucy
Eyes wide shut
February 1, 2008
Dear Lucy: : I'm often seized by extreme sleepiness
about one and half or two hours after lunch. I'm usually
much sleepier at this time of day than I am at midnight.
I think many people share this experience. Unfortunately,
many classes at MIT are scheduled in the afternoon, just
at this "sleepy time." Do you have any advice on how I can
become more alert at this time of day? —Somnolent
Sophomore
Dear S-squared: What a great question! You're correct
that many people share your experience of mid-afternoon drowsiness,
and that includes Lucy. A
midday nap is part of the daily routine in many cultures,
and many scientists now believe that this afternoon "downtime"—which
tends to occur between 2 and 3 p.m. for most people—is
hardwired as part of our circadian cycle. In fact, it even
coincides with a slight drop in body temperature.
Unfortunately, says MIT Medical psychologist Xiaolu Hsi,
Ph.D., this mid-day slump hits even harder if you're already
overtired, and "chronically overtired" describes most college
students. "Sleep deprivation is more pervasive than 'the
freshman 15,'" she says emphatically. Hsi's first suggestion,
therefore, is that students try to get enough sleep. "If
possible, this means seven to eight hours a night," she emphasizes. "Try
to peg your schedule to the hours of sunlight, especially
as far as getting up in the morning," she adds. "Staying
up past midnight, and then sleeping late the next day, is
not the best way to be effective in any area."
Hsi also suggests eating a lighter lunch. Although the
afternoon slump occurs whether or not one has eaten a midday
meal, normal afternoon drowsiness may be exacerbated by
a heavy noontime meal as the body's energy is diverted
to the task of digestion. Hsi's colleague, psychologist
Celene Barnes, Psy.D., further cautions against overdoing
it with carbs at lunchtime. Studies have shown that a high-carbohydrate
meal, especially one that is also low in protein, tends
to elevate serotonin levels in the brain, which causes
sleepiness. "Taking a brisk 10-minute walk before an afternoon
class is another way to make sure you start the class as
fully alert as possible," Hsi adds.
Finally, Lucy wants to remind you that you're never too
old for a nap. Many studies have shown that the best way
to deal with the mid-afternoon slump is not to fight it.
In fact, even a 10- to 15-minute nap can lead to several
hours of improved alertness and productivity. And short
daytime naps have been shown to be especially useful when
you're not getting enough sleep at night. Just keep naps
to no more than 45 minutes—set an alarm—and
don't nap after about 4 p.m. Lucy would also add that midday
naps are best taken before an afternoon class, not during! —Lucy
Perimenopause?
January 8, 2008
Dear Lucy: : I assume I am in perimenopause. I just
got my period after 10 months. Does that mean I am ovulating
again? My energy level is very low, so I assume my iron is
low. I do take Fergon iron supplements plus a multivitamin.
This period has drained me. Is there anything I can take
to feel energized? —Too tired
Dear TT: It's tough feeling tired all the time. Lucy
is glad you are seeking solutions to make things better.
Perimenopause, the interval of transition into menopause,
may last anywhere from two to eight years, MIT Medical gynecologist
Annie Liau, M.D., tells Lucy, and according to studies, 95
percent of women enter perimenopause between the ages of
39 and 51. During this time, menstrual cycles may become
irregular, and women may or may not ovulate during any particular
cycle. "Without ovulation, the interval between menstrual
cycles increases," Liau explains, "and bleeding can be excessive
when the period resumes." In general, she continues, "clinical
evaluation is recommended after a woman who has been menstruating
regularly misses three periods."
According to Liau, there are many conditions that can cause
amenorrhea, or absence of menstrual periods. "For example," she
says, "underactive thyroid is a health condition other than
perimenopause that can cause fatigue and amenorrhea. This
woman should make an appointment with her clinician at MIT
Medical—especially if she continues to have low energy
despite adequate sleep."
Your clinician will probably want to take a history, do
a physical exam, and order some laboratory tests to check
iron reserve and thyroid function, Liau tells Lucy. "It is
also important to observe the pattern of bleeding," she adds. "This
information should be shared with your clinician, so he or
she can decide if it would also be useful to check for abnormalities
of the uterine lining, perform a hormonal evaluation, or
do other clinical tests."
Lucy concurs with Liau's recommendation to make an appointment
with your personal clinician for a check-up. Perimenopause
is a natural transition in a woman's life, but that doesn't
mean a clinician shouldn't be involved in helping you make
this transition in the easiest, healthiest way possible. —Lucy
It's not the cough; it's the cover-up
December 7, 2007
Dear Lucy: I've seen the video that is making the
rounds about the proper protocol for sneezing or coughing
into your shirt sleeve rather than into your hands. I can
certainly understand the importance of doing this if you
have a cold or the flu. However, I am curious if it is as
critical to follow this protocol when I sneeze because of
allergies, or cough because cigarette smoke is bothering
me, or if I need to use Kleenex because I just had a spicy
dish or stepped out into the cold? —I saw it on
the Internet, so it must be true
Dear Seeker of Truth: It's amazing what one can learn
on YouTube.com. In
just 15 minutes, Lucy's learned how to wash a cat (welder's
gloves are a must, apparently), kill a ninja (not nearly
as hard as bathing a cat), and place an order at a sushi
bar. And, thanks to OtoRhinoLounsburgology Productions—and
the aptly named "Why
don't we do it in our sleeves?"—there's also a
YouTube video that demonstrates the proper way to cough,
or, more specifically, the proper way to cover one's cough
in order to avoid spreading germs.
But, amazingly enough, Lucy couldn't find an answer to your
question online, so she turned to MIT Medical nurse practitioner
and infection control coordinator Jacqueline Sherry, A.P.R.N.,
B.C. Sherry tells Lucy that coughing or sneezing into one's
sleeve is "generally good practice, no matter what has caused
your cough or sneeze." It's also the case, she continues,
that an individual cannot always know precisely what has
caused a cough or sneeze. "There are several types of respiratory
viruses," she notes, "and we may be unaware that we are infected.
There's also an incubation period between the time of infection
and the onset of symptoms, and practicing good respiratory
etiquette is the only way to be sure you are not spreading
germs before you are even aware that you are sick."
MIT Medical internist and infectious disease specialist
Howard Heller, M.D., concurs, noting also that people around
you won't know whether you're coughing due to illness, smoke,
allergies, or some other benign cause, so covering any cough
or sneeze appropriately will do much to enhance your reputation
as a thoughtful and considerate person. "And," he adds, "it's
easier to maintain good habits if you do something the same
way every time. If you get into the habit of coughing or
sneezing into your sleeve, no matter what, you'll do it automatically
when it really counts."
Can we scrap the Pap?
November 16, 2007
Dear Lucy: Since we now have a vaccine for human papillomavirus (HPV), developing an HPV blood test would seem to be a simple matter. Why can't doctors do an HPV blood titer, which would be more accurate than a Pap smear in testing for cervical cancer? —Prefers a Needle
Dear Needle: Why not, indeed? With a vaccine in
existence, a blood test seems only logical. Why must we
be subjected to annual Pap tests if a simple needle prick
would suffice? Lucy immediately called MIT Medical gynecologist
Dawn Anderson, M.D., to register an official complaint.
Anderson quickly shot down Lucy's conspiracy theories. It's not that doctors enjoy doing Pap smears, Anderson said, but, she emphasized, regular Pap tests are still the only reliable way to diagnose precancerous cell changes before they become cancerous.
As for a clinically useful blood test, "it's not as simple as it might seem," Anderson continues. "For research purposes, epidemiologists and vaccine developers use tests that look for HPV antibodies in the blood, but a positive test only indicates exposure to the virus at some time in the past." Epidemiological studies have shown relatively high rates of exposure to the HPV subtypes implicated in cervical cancer, but since only a small percentage of the population ever develops cervical cancer, the presence of HPV antibodies alone would not be diagnostic of the disease.
But research continues, Anderson notes, so "although blood titers are not currently used in screening, managing, treating or preventing cervical cancer, perhaps there will be a clinically useful blood test in the future." However, she adds, "The Pap smear doesn't just screen for HPV-related cervical cancer. It includes a visual inspection of not only the cervix, but also the vagina and vulva. So, even if we had a blood test that could detect HPV and had good positive and negative predictive value for cervical dysplasia, a speculum exam with visual inspection would still be recommended."
For now, Lucy would like to remind everyone that most cases of cervical cancer can be prevented. For her female readers, that means regular Pap tests to detect treatable, precancerous cell changes. And for girls and women older than nine, the new HPV vaccine, Gardasil, is available at MIT Medical (see http://web.mit.edu/medical/a-pressreleases.html#gardasil2) and elsewhere. —Lucy
A Pox on your House
October 12, 2007
Dear Lucy: I know that an adult who had chicken pox
as a child can get shingles from the dormant virus. Is there
any medical consensus on how to prevent this? Do the experts
at MIT Medical recommend, for example, getting the chicken
pox vaccine? And if an adult has had one case of shingles,
does that increase or decrease his chances of getting it
again, thus making preventative measures more or less necessary? —Shingular
Sensation
Dear Sensational: Though Lucy has been lucky enough
to avoid shingles, several of her acquaintances have not
been as fortunate. Shingles
(also referred to as herpes zoster) is an outbreak of skin
rash or blisters caused by the same virus that causes chicken
pox—the varicella-zoster virus. The first symptom may be
burning or tingling pain, or sometimes numbness or itch,
in a specific location on one side of the body—most often
in the trunk area, near the waistline. A few days or as much
as a week later, a rash of fluid-filled blisters, similar
to chicken pox, appears in the same spot. Shingles pain varies
in intensity. Some people experience it mostly as itchiness;
others feel excruciating pain from even a slight touch or
breeze.
According to MIT Medical internist Evelyn Picker, M.D.,
anyone who has had chicken pox is at risk for shingles, which
occurs when the long-dormant varicella-zoster virus somehow
reactivates. "A case of chicken pox in childhood confers
immunity to the virus," Picker explains. "But as we get older,
that immunity declines, which is why shingles is more common
in adults over 50."
The chicken pox vaccine is now part of the standard childhood
vaccination protocol. "It's also recommended for young adults
if they don't already have immunity to varicella-zoster," Picker
continues, "because the severity of the illness and complications
are worse as an adult. Unfortunately, the chicken pox vaccine
does not confer protection against shingles."
The good news is that there's now another vaccine that does.
In May 2006, the FDA approved Zostavax, a vaccine that can
prevent many cases of herpes zoster, or shingles. It's currently
recommended for use in adults over 60. "The vaccine 're-exposes'
you to the virus," Picker notes, " enabling your body to
boost immunity." However, she adds, "People with normal or
'competent' immune systems who have had shingles once rarely
experience a recurrence."
The Zostavax vaccine is available at MIT Medical and is
covered under the MIT Student/Affiliate Health Plan and Traditional
and Flexible MIT Health Plans with a $20 co-pay. MIT employees
who do not have one of the MIT Health Plans but do have the
Primary Care Benefit, pay nothing for vaccine administration
but are charged full price for the vaccine itself. Unfortunately,
the vaccine is not covered by Medicare, so retirees with
Medicare coverage would be liable for the cost of the vaccine
in addition to the administration fee. If you are interested
in the vaccine, Lucy encourages you to discuss it with your
primary care clinician. Shingles can be quite debilitating,
so it's probably worth trying to avoid. —Lucy
Oh, deer [fly]
September 12, 2007
Dear Lucy: Can deer flies transmit West Nile virus
or eastern equine encephalitis? I'm attacked by far more
deer flies than mosquitoes on my morning walks. The deer
flies certainly bite, and I've killed a few that have obviously
had a blood meal. —Once Bitten
Dear Once: Lucy also seems to be accompanied by
a number of nasty deer flies on her morning walks, and,
yes, they definitely bite! They are not repelled by conventional
insect repellents, nor are they put off by even the most
vigorous swatting. Unlike stinging insects, deer flies
have a mouth with razor-sharp "lips," which they use to slice the skin open, so they can feed on the resulting blood pool. Deer fly bites can be very painful, and some people also experience an allergic reaction to the salivary secretions released by the insects as they feed.
But the good news, says MIT Medical infectious disease specialist Howard Heller, M.D., is that deer flies can't transmit eastern equine encephalitis (EEE) or West Nile virus (WNV). "The viruses that cause EEE and WNV infect birds," Heller explains. "Mosquitoes become infected with these viruses after they feed on birds. Infected mosquitoes can then transmit those viruses to humans. Deer flies do not feed on birds and, therefore, do not become infected with these viruses."
Deer flies can transmit a bacterial infection known as tularemia,
Heller adds, but this is fairly rare and, in any case, totally
curable with antibiotics. Mosquitoes, which can transmit
EEE and WNV, are more of a threat, so you should use insect
repellent on your walks to ward off mosquitoes, even if they
seem less numerous than deer flies this time of year. Of
course, with winter rapidly approaching, neither mosquitoes
nor deer flies will be a problem soon!
—Lucy
Can I run away from fat?
August 15, 2007
Dear Lucy: I know you can lose fat if you run
just about every day at a proficient speed. But can running
help you lose fat in the upper-torso area—for example,
in the stomach and chest—as well as in the lower body? —Running
Off
Dear Running: Lots of people take up running or
brisk walking as part of a weight-loss program, so you
are probably not the only one with this question. For
more information on how running can melt the pounds away,
Lucy turned to MIT Medical health educator, Julie Banda,
M.P.H.
According to Banda, when coupled with a balanced diet, cardiovascular activities like running, walking, swimming, or biking, are great ways to lose body fat. That said, Banda explains, we're all genetically programmed to gain or lose weight more readily in certain parts of our bodies. "So, although running will probably help you lose body fat in both your upper and lower body, you may not lose fat evenly in all parts of your body," she says.
Running can help build strength in your legs, Banda continues, but it's also a good idea to add a basic strength-training program that works all the major muscle groups. "This will help you build muscle mass, reduce injury and risk of osteoporosis, and aid in your weight-loss goals, Banda notes.
"For individuals who are trying to lose weight, the recommendation is to get 60 to 90 minutes of moderate-to-intense cardiovascular activity on most days," Banda adds. But she encourages people to start with what feels manageable. "Begin by setting small goals and working towards them, she says, "and then build on your successes."
Lucy commends you on your interest in becoming more active, but she wants to remind you, and all her other readers, that exercise is more than just a weight-loss strategy. While many people begin an exercise program as temporary means to an end, it's important to remember that exercise is part of a healthy lifestyle. While being more active can help you lose weight in the short term, keeping it up can also help you avoid other health problems—everything from heart disease to depression. So keep moving! —Lucy
Star Trek X: The Wrath of the Ear Khan-al
July 9, 2007
Dear Lucy: I had knee surgery a few months ago. I now swim four or five times a week for physical therapy and fun. I love it! However, I recently noticed that I have this weird sensation in my left ear. It feels like an alien bug that keeps crawling in and out of my ear all day long. I don't wear a swim cap, because my head is too big. In fact, my head is so big I can use it as a floatation device in time of need. Anyway, do I have swimmer's ear, or is it truly one of those critters from Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan? —Alien Abduction
Dear Abducted: What a choice! Swimmer's ear or an
infestation by parasitic larvae of the green-blooded Ceti
eel, which, as all Trekkies know, gain entrance to human
cerebral cortexes through the ear canals of their hapless
victims? Never one to hesitate when faced with the possibility
that Earth has been invaded by extraterrestrials, Lucy wasted
no time in obtaining the expert opinion of MIT otolaryngologist
Robert Kiskaddon, M.D.
Though he hates to dash your hopes of a cameo appearance in the next Star Trek sequel, Kiskaddon puts creatures from planet Ceti Alpha V "lower on the list" of possible diagnoses. Nor does he think you have swimmer's ear. "Swimmer's ear is usually characterized by pain or itching," Kiskaddon says, "and sometimes a sensation that the ear is obstructed."
His conclusion? "The problem is most likely debris in the ear—wax and skin—which is getting moist during swims, and then gradually drying out," Kiskaddon says. He recommends an ear exam, which, he believes, "would probably clarify the problem and perhaps lead to alleviating the symptoms."
Lucy hopes you'll take Kiskaddon's advice and have your ear checked out by a clinician, as it sounds like an easily resolvable problem. Of course, should you start to exhibit symptoms of mind control or an overwhelming desire to betray Admiral Kirk to his enemies, it may be appropriate to reconsider the Ceti eel hypothesis. —Lucy
Softener fabrication?
June 15, 2007
Dear Lucy: During parent meetings at my son's school, the school psychologist often discusses the issue of fabric softeners. She states that they can cause allergic reactions that may lead to anxiety, depression, mental retardation, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and other problems in children. I had never heard this before and have been trying to research the issue without much success. Is there reliable research out there that supports her statements? If so, what does the research actually say? —Soft Sell
Dear Soft Sell: This is the first Lucy's heard of
a possible link between fabric softeners and developmental
problems in childhood. Anxiety, depression, and ADD seem
a high price to pay for soft tee shirts, so, like you, Lucy
was anxious to get to the bottom of this story. For answers,
she went straight to MIT's Office of Environment, Health,
and Safety, where she posed your question to industrial hygiene
officer Marilyn Hallock.
According to Hallock, many consumer products, such as fabric softeners, cleaners, and detergents, release very low levels of organic vapors. "There has been some discussion in consumer and public-health circles that such chemicals may cause psychological or neurological conditions such as depression and attention deficit disorder," Hallock continues. "However, there have been no reliable scientific studies documenting that these health effects occur."
Hallock believes that these concerns began with studies conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the early 1990s. In 1991, she explains, the EPA published a study showing that a variety of products found in the home—cigarette smoke, paints, pesticides, detergents, fabric softeners, and other materials—released low levels (in the part-per-billion range) of various, volatile organic compounds. "Related studies analyzed possible cancer risks from these compounds and found that organic vapors from second-hand smoke, gasoline products, solvent-based paints, moth repellents, and pesticides might contribute to cancer risk in the general population," Hallock reports. "However, organics released from detergents and fabric softeners were not associated with any increased cancer risk."
In advice to consumers, the EPA stresses that good air quality inside the home can be achieved by the reduction or elimination of cigarette smoke, solvent-based paints, pesticides, and other contaminants, such as lead and radon. For a complete list of EPA recommendations on indoor air quality, see The
Inside Story: A Guide to Indoor Air Quality.
The EPA does not recommend a reduction in the use of detergents, fabric softeners or similar products, Hallock emphasizes. On the other hand, she notes, fragrances found in these products can cause allergy symptoms in some people and may also trigger asthma attacks in people with asthma. For these reasons, you may wish to use the fragrance-free versions.
Lucy hopes this answers your question, and she commends you for, in the best MIT tradition, looking into this issue for yourself, rather than simply accepting a story that struck you as dubious.—Lucy
Booster shots for adults?
May 23, 2007
Dear Lucy: I am not sure if I have had a booster for polio as an adult. If I have, what would be the consequence of getting a second polio booster (about 10 years after the first)? —Long Shot
Dear Long Shot: Unless we're planning travel to exotic
destinations, most adults, Lucy included, spend very little
time thinking about vaccinations. And when it comes to the
polio vaccine, says MIT Medical nurse practitioner Janice
McDonough, A.P.R.N., B.C., that's just fine. "Once fully immunized against polio in childhood, we do not need polio boosters as adults," McDonough explains. "Boosters would be recommended only for scientists working with the polio virus or individuals traveling to certain countries where health standards might place one at risk or where there have been recent outbreaks of the disease." Otherwise, McDonough says, although additional boosters won't hurt you, the polio vaccines you received in childhood should provide sufficient protection.
The long-term effectiveness of the polio vaccine and most others is good news indeed, but Lucy wants to take this opportunity to remind her readers that adults do continue to need boosters for tetanus and diphtheria. The tetanus/diphtheria booster is recommended every 10 years during adulthood, and it's 100 percent effective in preventing the oft-fatal disease caused by the environmentally ubiquitous tetanus bacteria. If you don't remember the date of your last tetanus booster, check with your primary care clinician; and if you need a booster, get one. —Lucy
In The Rough
May 04, 2007
Dear Lucy: My golf game seems to be suffering these days. Is it possible that going through the change (menopause) could have anything to do with the slump I'm in? —Teed Off
Dear Teed Off: Lucy's been known to hit the links from time to time, so she found your question quite intriguing. Slumps can be so frustrating, so inexplicable, and so hard to shake off. And as a woman of a certain age, Lucy had to wonder if you'd hit on an excuse she might borrow: Another double bogey? Blame it on the change!
Unfortunately, according to the specialists Lucy consulted, it may not be that simple. "Perhaps the real question is whether one's physical abilities, stamina, and coordination change at menopause," speculates MIT Medical gynecologist Dawn Anderson, M.D. "The answer to that question would be ‘maybe.'" Though menopause should not change your physical abilities, Anderson explains, it might have affected your sleep patterns. "A number of women experience sleep difficulties at the time of menopause," Anderson continues. "Many women find themselves waking much earlier than desired, and then they feel tired throughout the day. Some women also report memory and cognitive changes, in terms of attention." Tiredness or distractibility could certainly affect one's golf game on any given day, but, Anderson feels, it would be a bit of a stretch to blame a prolonged slump on menopause.
Weekend golfer and chief of MIT Medical's Mental Health
Service, Psychologist Alan E. Siegel, Ed.D., concurs. "When
people go through significant transitions in life, it is
natural to feel a bit 'off,'" he notes. "In sports that
require great concentration, small changes in one's attention
can have a huge effect on performance. In golf, a small change
in one's ability to concentrate could have a big influence
on the subtleties of swing, resulting in hooks, slices, and
less overall consistency."
Siegel's prescription would be to eat well, get plenty of sleep, do other types of exercise, and generally try to take good care of yourself. "And if things don't improve, any mental health clinician could talk with you about this important time in your life," Siegel says. However, he adds, it's important to realize that every athlete experiences slumps from time to time, and often there's no medical or psychological explanation. Speaking as a golfer, Siegel recommends spending some time analyzing your game to see if anything has changed. "You may not need a medical clinician or mental health professional to deal with your slump," Siegel comments. "Sometimes a golf pro will have the cure."
Lucy hopes this helps, and while she's disappointed to have lost a potential excuse for her next bad shot, the good news is that we women of a certain age should be able to keep enjoying this game and other kinds of physical activity for many years to come. Fore!—Lucy
Bird flu & bird doo
April 09, 2007
Dear Lucy: I read a newspaper article about bird
flu, in which a scientist from Harvard's School of Public
Health noted that putting one's hand in bird excrement
would be one way of contracting the disease. He seemed
to scoff at the idea of anyone actually doing that, but
another recent article in the same paper reported that
many local playing fields are covered in goose doo. And
just the other day, while eating a salad at one of the
tables outside the Student Center, I caught myself picking
up a piece of lettuce that had blown onto the grated table
top and eating it. As I did, I noticed that the lettuce
had picked up some residue of what may well have been bird
droppings. (Yeah, not too smart, but it was done without
thinking.) Anyway, lots of people eat outside at the Institute,
and lots of us play sports, or have kids who play sports,
on outdoor fields also used by geese. So how concerned
should we really be about this mode of transmission? —Doos
and Don'ts
Dear Doos: Lucy has never been a fan of what some people euphemistically refer to as "the five-second rule," nor has she ever considered salad a finger food. But etiquette issues aside, this is a great health-related question, and to address those concerns, Lucy turned to MIT internist and infectious disease specialist Howard Heller, M.D.
"There haven't been any cases of bird flu in North America," Heller notes, "but
it is very appropriate to be cautious around bird droppings
in areas of the world where avian influenza has been reported.
Duck droppings are of the greatest concern, because ducks
can be heavily infected with avian flu without getting sick.
Fortunately, droppings from chickens and swans, the other
two types of birds that have been primarily affected so far,
are not commonly found in public areas in Boston." There have been no reports of affected pigeons, sparrows, robins, or similar birds common to this area, Heller adds.
As for geese, Heller tells Lucy that geese infected with avian flu have been reported in China. "If avian flu hits North America," Heller says, "and if it is found in geese, I would recommend that people avoid eating or participating in recreational activities in public areas that have a lot of goose droppings."
And, whether or not avian flu ever reaches these shores, Lucy further recommends abandoning any bits of food that fall from your fork to the tabletop, floor, or any other non-plate surface. While you may have avoided consuming bird droppings when snagging that piece of lettuce from the table outside the Student Center, that "residue" you ate probably wasn't anything terribly healthy or nutritious either. —Lucy
Into the drink
March 22, 2007
Dear Lucy: A friend just told me that sparkling water (seltzer) doesn't count towards the eight glasses of water we are supposed to drink each day. But I disagreed. It seems to me that water is water. Who is right? —Tiny Bubbles
Dear Bubbles: Lucy recruited MIT Medical nutritionist, Anna Jasonides, R.D., to be the arbiter in this disagreement, and she came down firmly on your side. "Water is water," Jasonides agrees, "and other fluids, like juice and milk, will also keep one adequately hydrated." In addition, she notes, even caffeinated drinks can add to one's daily fluid intake. Studies show that the average person retains between half and two-thirds of the fluid consumed by drinking caffeinated beverages, while individuals who regularly consume these kinds of drinks retain even more.
Furthermore, Jasonides continues, the recommendation to
drink eight glasses of water per day "isn't as scientific
as we might like to think." And
don't just take her word for it; a fairly recent report from
the Food and Nutrition Board of the Institute of Medicine
concurs. The 2004 publication, Dietary Reference Intakes:
Water, Potassium, Sodium, Chloride, and Sulfate, notes that
while fluid needs vary depending on activity level, environment,
diet, and other conditions, a significant amount of the fluid
we need each day—approximately 20 percent—is obtained from
the foods we eat. It concludes that, over the long run, for
healthy individuals who simply drink when they are thirsty, "fluid
consumption will match body water needs."
So, drink all the sparkling water you’d like—when you’d like—and if you’re thirsty, drink some more! —Lucy
Sleepless nights
February 28, 2007
Dear Lucy: For a month, I've been feeling blue and
anxious and have had trouble sleeping. I am job hunting and
struggling with a difficult project. About every third night,
I can sleep only two to four hours. Someone suggested I take
valerian to help me sleep. Is this a good idea? —Tossing
and Turning
Dear T&T: Lucy gets lots of questions about herbal
remedies such as valerian root. It's important to remember
that in the United States, such "medicinal herbs" are sold
as dietary supplements, which are regulated as food, not
drugs, so they are not required to be tested for manufacturing
consistency. This means that the composition, amount of herbal
extract, and effectiveness may differ greatly between manufacturing
lots.
"It probably isn't harmful to take valerian for sleep problems," MIT
psychiatrist Simon Lejeune, M.D., tells Lucy, but
he cautions that research has not yet demonstrated its clinical
effectiveness as a sleep aid. For more information, Lejeune
suggests reading the valerian fact sheet from the National
Institutes of Health. "It would be a good idea to talk to
a medical professional about sleep medications," he continues, "as
there are many more effective options than valerian."
And, while Lejeune says that it's common to feel blue and
have trouble sleeping for a few days during times of stress,
insomnia that continues for more than a few days may indicate
a more serious problem. "Given everything that's happening
in your life, it might be helpful to talk to a mental health
professional," he advises. "This kind of discussion may help
you get some perspective on the situation," Lejeune explains, "and
that could relieve some of the stress you are feeling."
Mental health consultations are available to all MIT students,
staff, faculty, and affiliates. For appointments, call MIT
Medical's Mental Health Service at 617-253-2916, or go to
the walk-in clinic on the third floor of MIT Medical from
2–4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and be seen the same day.
Lucy is glad you took the time to ask for advice, and she's
sure that with the right help, you'll be sleeping better
soon. —Lucy
Upstairs, Downstairs
February 7, 2007
Dear Lucy: I had a conversation with a friend who recently had knee surgery. She told me that one of her doctors told her that no one should use stairs, even for one flight—that in the long run, going up and down stairs does too much damage to your knees.
In contrast, I have been making a point of taking the stairs—often two at a time—for anything less than four floors. I don't have knee problems now, but am I putting those joints at risk by using stairs and not elevators? —Kneed Exercise
Dear Kneedy: Like you, Lucy's a stair-climber (albeit one who takes the stairs at a more sedate one-at-a-time pace), so your question raised her anxiety level just a bit. Though she briefly entertained the idea of running downstairs to MIT Medical's Orthopedic Service for an answer, she decided to play it safe, avoid the stairs, and send an email instead.
The prompt reply Lucy received from orthopedic surgeon Ronald Geiger, M.D., should put both our minds at ease. "Taking the stairs for two or three flights is excellent exercise for most people," Geiger writes. In fact, he adds, except for those with patella [kneecap] problems, he encourages stair climbing as exercise for his patients, as long as they don't have significant arthritis.
Weight-bearing exercise, like walking and stair-climbing, has many benefits, including maintaining bone mass and preventing osteoporosis. Although, like all joints, knees are subject to overuse injuries, it's safe to say that the risks of inactivity are much, much greater than the risks of injury during moderate exercise. The key to preventing exercise injuries is to follow a couple of common-sense rules:
- Increase exercise gradually: For example, if you've
been in the elevator habit for a long time, start with
one flight of stairs at first, and
- Listen to your body: In other
words, if something's painful, stop doing it.
Assuming you're not experiencing any pain while taking the
stairs, Lucy encourages you to continue your elevator-spurning
habits; as will she. See you in the stairwells! —Lucy
Calcium and osteoarthritis?
November 9, 2006
Dear Lucy: I have never paid much attention to my calcium intake until recently. But now I am 26 and have the beginnings of osteoarthritis. I can only fault myself for not getting enough calcium over the years. Should I take more than the recommended dose of calcium now to make up for all those years when I didn’t get enough? Or should I just stick with the recommended 1000 mg. per day? —Making Up For Lost Time
Dear Making Up: Lucy is very sorry to hear that you are dealing with osteoarthritis at such a young age, but please stop blaming yourself for not doing enough to prevent it. According to MIT Medical rheumatologist Michael Kane, M.D., your previously insufficient calcium intake could not have contributed to your current problems.
"Osteoarthritis is a joint disease in which cartilage,
the slippery tissue covering the ends of bones, wears away,"
Kane tells Lucy. "When cartilage degenerates, bones underneath
the cartilage may rub together, causing pain and swelling
in the joint." You may be thinking of osteoporosis, a condition
in which bones become fragile and more likely to break. Since
osteoporosis is a disease of the bones, its development may
be affected by calcium intake, Kane says. But osteoarthritis
is a very different disease, he emphasizes. "In osteoarthritis,"
Kane notes, "any changes to the bone are secondary, and calcium
cannot prevent or affect its development."
Of course, calcium is still an important nutrient for women
of all ages, and it’s great you are paying attention to your
calcium intake now, says MIT Medical nutritionist Anna Jasonides,
R.D. But, she says, you shouldn’t try to make up for lost
time by taking extra supplements because, when it comes to
calcium, more is not necessarily better. "The safe supplemental
range for calcium is up to 1500 mg. per day," she explains,
"but ingesting more than 2,000 mg. gets you into the toxicity
range."
In addition, Jasonides reminds you not to forget other important
nutrients, especially vitamin D, which stimulates calcium
absorption. "Dividing the total daily supplemental dose is
also helpful," Jasonides adds. "Your body will absorb
more calcium with several small doses over the course of
the day."
It might also be helpful to make an appointment with the clinician who diagnosed your osteoarthritis to discuss treatment options. There’s no cure for osteoarthritis, but proper treatment can reduce your pain and stiffness, allow for greater joint motion, and slow the progression of the disease. Good luck! —Lucy
Headache after exercising
October 4, 2006
Dear Lucy: I've been trying to shed some extra pounds by exercising regularly. Normally I do about 40 minutes of cardio on a treadmill or elliptical machine at the gym (in addition to some strength training). But about an hour after every workout, I end up with a pounding headache. I've tried drinking plenty of water ahead of time in case dehydration is the problem, but this doesn't seem to help. What could be causing this problem, and how can I prevent it? —Exercise in Frustration
Dear Frustrated: You're to be commended for embarking on an exercise and fitness program, but, according to MIT Medical nurse practitioner Janice McDonough, A.P.R.N., B.C., the headaches may be more than a simple annoyance. "It could be nothing, or it could be something," she tells Lucy, "but it is not normal."
McDonough suggests calling your primary care clinician for an evaluation. "Headaches after exercise could be caused by anything from low caloric and/or fluid intake to low glucose, high blood pressure, or some other condition causing increased intracranial pressure," she says. But whatever is causing the headaches, they are a symptom that should not be ignored, she emphasized.
There you have it. Call your doctor, and get this checked out before you climb back on the treadmill. Lucy hopes it's nothing serious, but she'll feel better knowing that you're getting an expert opinion on the matter. —Lucy
Back off!
September 5, 2006
Dear Lucy: I have a pain in my lower back on the
right side, and sometimes the pain travels to my right thigh.
This only happens when I am walking briskly, and then I have
to stop walking to stop the pain. Can you tell me what might
be causing this? —Bad Back
Dear BB: Your problem sounds both painful and annoying.
Fortunately, Lucy knew exactly where to turn for an answer:
MIT Medical orthopedic nurse practitioner Anthony M. Pasqualone,
MSN, NP-C.*
Although it's impossible to make a proper diagnosis without
a physical examination, Pasqualone speculates that you may
be suffering from a lumbar vertebral disc displacement. "The
vertebrae in the lower back are separated by discs that act
as 'shock absorbers,'" Pasqualone explains. "Discs have a
hard outer layer and a gel-like center. As a person ages,
it's common for the center of the disc to start losing water
content, making its shock absorption less effective and causing
the center of the disc to become displaced, which puts pressure
on the nerves that come off the spine and protrude out between
the vertebrae. Because the displaced disc presses on the
nerves that go to the lower body, it can cause pain that
extends to the thigh."
In extreme cases, Pasqualone says, the disc must be repaired
surgically. "Fortunately, however, the vast majority of people
with this problem can recover and resume their normal activities
without surgery," Pasqualone notes. "Aggressive physical
therapy works very well." Treatment goals include reducing
inflammation and pain; improving flexibility, strength, and
endurance through specific exercises; and learning new ways
to perform activities of daily living while avoiding stress
on the lower back.
Lucy suggests that you start by making an appointment with
your primary care provider. From there, you may be referred
to an orthopedic specialist or directly to physical therapy.
But it's important to deal with this problem promptly in
order to prevent further damage. Good luck! —Lucy
* Since helping Lucy answer this question, Pasqualone,
a lieutenant colonel in the Army Reserve Nurse Corps, has
been called up to active duty and is now serving in Iraq.
He's slated to return to MIT Medical in the fall of 2007.
Covering my a**
June 28, 2006
Dear Lucy: I was wondering if there are communicable
diseases one can get from using a public toilet and if toilet
seat covers actually reduce the chances of those diseases
being transmitted. I'm all for being healthy and sanitary,
but I'm also an environmentalist and don't see any point
in wasting the paper if it's not doing any good. —Caught
With My Pants Down
Dear Caught: What a great question!
Lucy must confess some fondness for the idea of a barrier
between her own derriere and all the derrieres that have
previously occupied the same public toilet seat. But, like
you, she's wondered what measure of protection a thin sheet
of paper might actually afford and from what dangers she
is being protected.
For answers, Lucy turned to MIT Medical internist
and infectious disease specialist Howard Heller, M.D. Not
surprisingly, Heller confirms our suspicions that as long
as the seat is visibly clean, toilet seat covers provide
little more than a reduction in the "ick factor" associated
with using a public toilet. "It's very difficult to get sick
from a toilet seat," Heller says adamantly. "This is especially
true for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs)," he adds.
(Hmmm… apparently, there's a reason they're referred
to as sexually transmitted.) However, Heller notes, "a little
extra caution might be warranted if one is traveling in an
area where enteric infections like cholera are more common."
But for most diseases, Heller continues, "toilet
seat transmission" would require the unlikely coincidence
of two factors: 1) the presence of a sufficient number of
germs to cause illness, and 2) a way for those germs on the
seat to get into your urethra, genital tract, or blood stream.
Interestingly enough, the first condition may be even more
unlikely than the second. Microbiologists studying bacterial
concentrations in offices found, in every case, that toilet
seats were, by far, the cleanest surfaces of any sampled-a
whopping 50 times cleaner than phone receivers, which were
the filthiest. (High germ counts were also found on office
desktops, the computer keyboard, and the mouse.)
But don't think public restrooms are without
hazards. Just think about the number of unwashed hands that
touch bathroom door handles, sinks, faucets, and towel dispensers
in public restrooms. Now that's a source of germs worth worrying
about. So, wash your hands correctly (see http://www.uhn.ca/patient/general/handwashing.asp for
a video demonstration of correct hand-washing technique)
and, to avoid recontamination of clean hands, use a paper
towel to turn off the water tap and open the exit door. Lucy's "bottom" line?
You may safely forgo the toilet seat cover, but put some
paper between your hands and other bathroom surfaces. —Lucy
Tae Kwon Don't!
June 7, 2006
Dear Lucy: I compete in taekwondo. I am 5 ft., 4 in., and normally weigh 120 pounds, but after taking time off from my training due to a shoulder injury, I now weigh 130. Can you recommend a diet that will allow me to lose weight quickly and efficiently? I need to lose 18 pounds in six weeks to qualify for my weight division in an upcoming competition.
I take a daily vitamin supplement, and I work out daily,
so I can easily burn more calories than I take in. Please
recommend a diet that will help me lose this weight in six
weeks. —Side Kick
Dear Kick: Taekwondo is great exercise
and great fun. But your plan to drop 18 pounds in six weeks
set off alarm bells for Lucy, so she decided to run it by
MIT Medical nutritionist Anna Jasonides, R.D.
Jasonides confirms Lucy's suspicions
that when it comes to losing weight, your plan involves too
much, too fast. "The maximum amount of weight one should
lose is two pounds per week," she asserts. "You can do that
by reducing your current intake by 1,000 calories a day,
by expending some of those calories in exercise, or with
a combination of the two. Any more than that is too extreme
and would be considered unhealthy."
Jasonides also recommends that you take a multivitamin
and make sure you are eating enough protein—at least
1.2 grams per killogram of your ideal weight. "For you, that
is 65 grams per day," Jasonides says. She also warns against
allowing your daily caloric intake to dip below 1,200 calories. "If
you eat too little, your metabolism can slow down too much," she
cautions. "And a slower metabolism will make weight loss
slower."
The bottom line, Jasonides says, is that there
is no quick and healthy way to lose weight. Take it
slow, she recommends, and think about how you will maintain
your target weight when you reach it. "As a serious athlete,
you don't want to be in a position where you're constantly
'pulling tricks' to keep your weight low," she notes. "A
healthy balance is the key to optimum athletic performance."
Hope this helps. Best of luck in future competition. —Lucy
Acupuncture coverage?
April 24, 2006
Dear Lucy: I have the MIT Traditional Plan. Does my medical coverage allow me to use acupuncture treatments? —On Pins and Needles
Dear Pins: For help in answering this
question, Lucy contacted Leslie Patton, Claims and Member
Services Administrator for the MIT Health Plans. According
to Patton, the Traditional and Flexible MIT Health Plans
cover acupuncture treatments only for pain management, and
only with a referral from an MIT Medical provider. The benefit
is limited to 18 visits per calendar year, and covered patients
must receive their acupuncture treatments at MIT Medical,
New England School of Acupuncture or the Massachusetts General
Hospital Pain Clinic.
Of course, without more details about your specific situation, it's impossible to know if you are a candidate for acupuncture coverage. In any case, Lucy recommends an appointment with your primary care clinician as a first step. Together, you can discuss various treatment possibilities and whether or not acupuncture may be a good option for you. Good luck! —Lucy
Peanut allergies?
March 29, 2006
Dear Lucy: At my son's school, we've been asked not
to send peanut butter sandwiches, or any food containing
peanuts, for lunch or snack. I don't remember these restrictions
when I was in school; in fact, peanut butter and jelly sandwiches
were a staple of my childhood diet. Are peanut allergies
more common these days, or are we just more sensitive to
it? —Cracker Jack
Dear CJ: Lucy has many fond childhood
memories involving peanut butter-though she must confess
some preference for the fluffernutter, as opposed to the
more pedestrian PB&J. Kids and peanut butter have long seemed
a natural combination, so, like you, Lucy has wondered about
the increasing number of restrictions on peanuts in public
places. For answers, she turned to MIT pediatric nurse practitioner
Pat Bartels, A.P.R.N., B.C., F.N.P.-C.
According to Bartels, although peanut allergy
still affects less than one percent of the population (about
1.5 million Americans), recent studies do show that the problem
is becoming more prevalent. In a five-year period, from 1997-2002,
there was a two-fold increase in the incidence of peanut
allergies in children. No one knows for sure why this is
happening.
Peanut allergy is normally diagnosed in early childhood,
Bartels explains, and only rarely develops later in life. "Peanut
allergy is significant," Bartels continues, "because
it is usually not outgrown, and because peanuts are such
a common food in this country and so hard to avoid." Symptoms
can affect the skin (swelling, hives/welts, itchiness, redness),
the gut (itchy mouth, stomach ache, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea,
odd taste), the respiratory system (hoarseness, difficulty
swallowing, wheezing, repetitive coughing, throat closing,
difficulty breathing), and circulation (paleness, dizziness,
low blood pressure, loss of consciousness, loss of pulse). "In
severe cases," Bartels notes, "life-threatening
reactions can be triggered by even minute exposure."
MIT Medical's Pediatric Service considers an infant or young
child to be at increased risk for peanut allergy if he or
she has a family history of allergies or a personal history
of skin problems, such as eczema or other types of rashes,
Bartels explains. "Though it's not clear if peanut allergy
can be prevented, we suggest that women avoid ingesting peanuts
during the third trimester of pregnancy, as well as during
breastfeeding. We also recommend not introducing peanuts
into a child's diet before the age of two or three." Reading
food labels is also important, Bartels adds. "If a person
is allergic to peanuts, they must also avoid foods labeled
as containing 'mixed nuts, ground nuts, mandelonas, peanut
butter, peanut oil, goober nuts, goober peas, beer nuts,
peanut flour, artificial nuts, and hydrolyzed peanut protein,'" Bartels
says.
So, if your child has a classmate with a peanut allergy,
it needs to be taken seriously. But for children who are
not allergic-and Lucy is happy to hear that is still the
vast majority-peanuts and peanut butter can still be healthy,
nutritious snacks, at home if not in school. —Lucy
Caffeine addiction?
March 7, 2006
Dear Lucy: I think I might be addicted to caffeine.
I usually have a cup or two of coffee and several diet cokes
throughout the day. How can I tell if I'm addicted, and what
can I do to quit without being unable to concentrate on my
work? —Java Joe
Dear Joe: Addicted to caffeine? The
very thought almost made Lucy spill her low-fat, lactose-free,
double-shot, caramel latte macchiato on her computer keyboard!
Just as quickly as her shaking hands could type, Lucy forwarded
your question to MIT psychiatrist and addiction expert Adam
Silk, M.D. According
to Silk, the current edition of the psychiatric diagnostic
manual-the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,
IV, commonly referred to as the DSM-4-does not include diagnoses
of caffeine abuse or dependency. "The DSM-4 recognizes the
disorders of 'caffeine intoxication,' 'caffeine-induced sleep
disorder,' and 'caffeine-induced anxiety disorder,'" Silk
explains. "It also provides a sort of catch-all category
called 'caffeine-related disorder, not otherwise specified,'
but none of these diagnoses would be considered an addiction
by medical standards."
On the other hand, Silk continues, unless you're concerned
with insurance coverage or billing, "maybe it's just semantics.
After all, everyone knows that ingesting a lot of caffeine
can make you feel bad, and that stopping it abruptly can
make you uncomfortable for a while. Many lay people, and
even some in the medical community, would call that 'addiction'
or 'dependence.'"
The bottom line, Silk says, is that if you are concerned
about your use of caffeine, you should try to do something
about it. Researchers at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
have identified a number of caffeine-withdrawal symptoms,
ranging from headache and fatigue to, in rare cases, nausea
and vomiting. They found that symptoms usually begin within
12-24 hours after stopping all caffeine ingestion, are at
their worst in the first two days, and may continue for up
to nine days. "Gradually reducing caffeine consumption over
time, by substituting decaffeinated or non-caffeinated beverages
for regular coffee and caffeinated soft drinks, is much easier
than going 'cold turkey,'" Silk says. "And if you are having
trouble stopping on your own, it may be helpful to talk with
a mental health professional about behavioral techniques
that are useful in breaking habits."
Lucy hopes this is helpful to you. It's inspired Lucy to
put down the latte, at least for the moment, and take a hard
look at her own caffeine consumption as well. Good luck kicking
the habit —Lucy
Feel the Brrrrrrr.n!
February 13, 2006
Dear Lucy: Is it true that you burn more calories when the ambient temperature is lower? Should I quit exercising at the Z-Center and take up running along the river instead? —Calorie Conscious
Dear CC: According to MIT Medical health educator
and certified personal trainer Deirdre Neylon, the idea that one burns
more calories in cold weather is a myth-one that persists because, on
the surface, it makes so much sense. The
reasoning goes that since it takes more energy to maintain
core body temperature in a cold environment, and since energy equals
calories, the body will burn more calories in cold weather. But the truth
is that, as long as you are dressed appropriately, cold temperatures
alone won't cause you to burn more calories. You won't start using up
additional calories unless your body temperature drops enough to induce
shivering. And although intense shivering may burn 400 calories an hour,
it also depletes muscle glycogen stores and drains energy, creating a
potentially dangerous state of affairs, so Lucy does not recommend shivering
as a form of winter exercise!
Of course, certain wintertime activities do offer the potential for
burning more calories. For example, the resistance one encounters
when walking in snow or running into the wind can provide
a greater workout than the same activity done in more optimal conditions.
And you'll also burn additional calories if you are wearing heavy clothes,
like boots or a parka, or carrying the weight of extra equipment,
like skis or snow shoes.
But while Neylon doesn't recommend abandoning the gym for
outdoor exercise on the basis of caloric considerations,
getting outside in the winter can add some variety and fun
to your workout schedule, as long as you play it safe. With
that in mind, Lucy offers the following tips for outdoor
winter workouts:
- Drink sufficient fluids. According
to experts, failing to drink enough fluids is one of the
most common mistakes made by winter athletes. Since we tend
to feel less thirsty when it's cold, winter athletes need
to consciously consume fluids to replace the water that is
lost through perspiration and breathing.
- Dress in layers: Start with a thin
layer of one of the new synthetic materials that draw sweat
away from the body, and build from there. Your outermost
layer should be resistant to wind and water. But make sure
every layer is made of a "breathable" material, so sweat
doesn't get trapped near the skin, which can cause chilling.
- Warm up first. Cold muscles are tighter
and more prone to injury, so warm up before beginning
any intense physical activity. And make sure you dress
for your workout; if you're perfectly warm at the start
of your warm-up phase, you'll be too warm by the time you
really get going.
- Head into the wind when you start out. Then,
when you head home with the wind at your back, possibly
sweaty, you'll be less likely to get chilled.
- Wear sunscreen. Sunscreen and lip
balm are important protection all year round, and especially
when the sun is reflecting off the snow.
Good luck with your winter workouts, and keep exercising! —Lucy
Jump and hurl?
February 6, 2006
Dear Lucy: When working out, especially when doing
anything that includes jumping, I end up tossing my cookies,
and then I feel better right away. If I continue working
out, I feel like throwing up again within 10 minutes or less.
This happens whether my stomach is empty or full. If my stomach's
empty, I vomit up a clear fluid at first, but after a few
minutes, I get a bright yellow liquid material coming out.
Can you help me determine why my stomach is so easily upset
and what I can do to fix it? —(up)Chuck
Dear Chuck: Lucy sympathizes with your
predicament. At the same time, she hopes not to find herself
working out next to you at the gym before you get this problem
under control. With
some sense of urgency, Lucy brought your problem to MIT Medical
gastroenterologist Richard Gardner, M.D.
Gardner tells Lucy he believes you may be suffering from
exercise-induced acid reflux. "Vigorous exercise, especially
if it includes jumping and bending over, may result in reflux
of stomach contents—acid and sometimes bile—into
the esophagus," Gardner explains. "Some individuals
are more prone to reflux due to a weak sphincter muscle between
the stomach and esophagus." This tendency may be increased
when one exercises soon after eating, he adds.
Acid reflux is a potentially serious problem, Gardner emphasizes. "Individuals
with significant acid reflux may irritate and damage the
lining of the esophagus, resulting in heartburn and nausea," he
notes. He recommends that you make an appointment to discuss
this problem with your primary care physician, who can refer
you to a gastrointestinal specialist for evaluation and appropriate
treatment.
Lucy wishes you the best of luck in resolving this problem
soon, so you can resume a healthy, active lifestyle—in
other words, more stretching and less retching —Lucy
Craving cashmere
January 10, 2006
Dear Lucy:Clothing with wool (even a small amount)
makes me itchy, and I've avoided lanolin products for years.
But with all the lovely looking cashmere sweaters, I'm tempted
to buy. Am I likely to have the same problem with cashmere
as wool? —Itchy & Scratchy
Dear I&S: Lucy's with you and so many
other people when it comes to wool-just thinking about it
makes her itch! So it came as quite a surprise when MIT Medical
dermatology nurse practitioner Barbara Starr, A.P.R.N., B.C.,
told her that wool allergies are actually quite rare.
"Though lots of people believe they are allergic to wool,
we now know that it's the unique construction of the fiber
itself that irritates the skin and causes the prickle and
itch so many of us associate with wearing wool," Starr says.
Under a microscope, a single fiber of wool looks like a strand
of hair covered with coarse scales that overlap and curl
outward. These fibers have a natural crimp that "springs
back" after being stressed and permeable interiors that can
absorb 30 percent of their weight in moisture without feeling
damp. These characteristics make wool durable and warm, Starr
explains, but for many people, they also trigger a reaction
in the skin's pain receptors to cause a prickly, itchy feeling.
Interestingly, Starr adds, people who react to wool this
way often have similar reactions to clothing that has been
dried with fabric softener sheets. "While tumbling in the
dryer, little particles from the fabric softener sheets get
attached to clothes. Later, an individual wearing this clothing
may feel itchy," Starr explains. "It's not an allergy to
the fabric softener. It's these invisible particles that
irritate the skin and trigger the itch response."
Starr thinks you and Lucy will probably be comfortable wearing
cashmere-or even a higher-end (read "more expensive") wool
fiber such as the fine or super-fine varieties of Merino
wool. Cashmere and Merino wool are as warm as regular wool,
but neither has the characteristics that cause prickle and
itch in regular woolen garments. Cashmere, which is classified
as a hair fiber, is made from the fine, soft undercoat of
the Cashmere (or Kashmir) goat. Merino fibers, made from
the fine wool of the Merino sheep, has overlapping scales
that do not curl outward like those of regular wool fibers.
Lucy finds this information absolutely fascinating and believes
some testing is in order. Fortunately, atmospheric conditions
are now favorable for a controlled experiment (in other words,
winter is here in full force). Will you and Lucy find cashmere
and Merino wool non-irritating? Will we find it fashionable?
In the interest of science, these questions must be answered.
I don't know about you, but Lucy is off to the mall! —Lucy
Live long and perspire?
Dear Lucy: I've heard that aluminum deposits have
been found in the brains of people who have died of Alzheimer's
disease. Will using underarm deodorants or antiperspirants
with aluminum compounds cause aluminum to enter the body?
Also, will wearing pierced earrings made of silver introduce
silver into the body? —Heavy Metal
Dear Metal: Lucy has long been an advocate
of deodorant use, so she nearly broke a sweat at the suggestion
that its use might be endangering the perspiring masses.
Anxious for the best information she could find on this question,
Lucy went straight to MIT Medical's chief of medicine, David
Diamond, M.D., who is also a specialist in environmental
medicine.
According to Diamond, while some studies have found higher-than-normal
aluminum concentrations in brains from Alzheimer's patients,
it isn't clear there is any causal relationship between these
aluminum levels and the disease. In any case, he says, the
aluminum compound in antiperspirants is not easily absorbed
by the body. "One study found that less than 1/10,000th of
a topical application labeled with a tracer was found internally," Diamond
observes. "And in relative amounts, you absorb more aluminum
from the foods you eat than from daily antiperspirant use."
Still, Diamond notes, for individuals who want to avoid
aluminum whenever possible, there are alternatives to antiperspirants
that include aluminum compounds as an active ingredient.
Check out the personal care products at your local health
food store, he suggests, or buy a conventional deodorant
instead of an antiperspirant. Most deodorants that don't
say "antiperspirant" on the label are aluminum free, though
you should read the ingredient list to be sure.
As for your earrings, Diamond explains that elemental silver
is relatively poorly absorbed through intact skin. "In fact," he
notes, "silver is a main ingredient in one of the best anti-infective
creams used extensively in treatment of burn patients. Several
studies of these patients have failed to show systemic effects,
even after many days of extensive exposure to damaged skin.
"The bottom line," Diamond concludes, "is that it's probably
safe to go out wearing antiperspirant with your earrings." As
relieved as she is by this news, Lucy feels compelled to
add that, in the interest of decency, it's probably best
to wear something else as well. —Lucy
Will they lettuce have some peas?
Dear Lucy: According to the new Dietary Guidelines
for Americans, an individual on a 2000-calorie-per-day
diet should be eating two cups of fruit and two and a half
cups of vegetables per day. I happen to like veggies more
than fruit. Can I substitute an additional cup of vegetables
for one of the cups of fruit? —Age of Asparagus
Dear Asparagus: The fruit and vegetable
recommendations in the new Dietary Guidelines have been the
source of much discussion. However, most questions about
substitution seem to be coming from people who, unlike you,
prefer fruits to vegetables. But in either case, the real
question is this: From the perspective of a balanced, healthy
diet, what is the difference between fruits and vegetables?
Not much, answers MIT Medical nutritionist Anna Jasonides,
R.D. "Fruits and vegetables provide many of the same
nutrients, including vitamin A, vitamin C, potassium, folate,
and dietary fiber," Jasonides tells Lucy. In fact, many foods
that would be botanically classified as fruits (defined as "the
mature ovary of a seed plant") are considered vegetables
by most people—even people at the USDA, as it turns
out. For example, in the vegetable section of "Inside
the Pyramid" at MyPyramid.gov,
the USDA's consumer website on the new dietary guidelines,
four of the six "orange vegetables" listed—acorn
squash, butternut squash, hubbard squash, and pumpkin—are
technically "fruits." Other "fruits" on the government's
vegetable list include cucumbers, eggplant, green or red
peppers, tomatoes, and zucchini.
The bottom line, Jasonides concludes, is that as long as
you are eating a variety of types and colors, fruit-vegetable
substitution is fine, in either direction. Just watch your
calories, she warns. "In general, fruits have about
twice the number of calories as vegetables," she notes, so
substituting veggies for fruits on the MyPyramid plan will
mean making up the calorie difference by eating more, while
substituting fruits for veggies will require borrowing calories
from your discretionary allowance.
Happy veggie eating! And for more information on the new
dietary guidelines, see the Summer
2005 issue of health@mit. —Lucy
|
|