|
|
We have spent the semester designing solutions to our team goals.
Throughout the semester, we have learned from our research and received
input from the other teams, so our proposal has changed. Below
are our previous proposals, and information on how we have updated or
discarded them.
1)
Adding another major distributary channel of the
Mississippi river south of New Orleans would help carry sediment to the
wetlands east and southeast of the city. This would
not improve conditions for flood control in the city itself, but
relocation of people would be minimized.
Compare this with our current
plan. We have changed to two distributaries so that we can send
sediment to a larger area of wetlands. We are using already
existing channels to decrease labor costs, and are incorporating one of
them with our plan to modify the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet (MR-GO).
2)
Adding another major distributary channel of the
Mississippi river between Baton Rouge and New Orleans would help carry
sediment to the wetlands south and southeast of New Orleans.
This would decrease the volume of water flowing past the
city at any given time and would make flood control easier, but the
degree of population relocation required would be significantly greater
than in our first proposal.
We have abandoned this idea
because it would prevent us from getting the maximum possible amount of
sediment to the wetlands. Taking water from the river higher up
would decrease the amount of water available to divert to the wetlands
southeast of New Orleans, which are more critical for us to
protect. Also, any river channel upriver of New Orleans would
create other new problems: it would have
to be restricted, so as not to displace more people, and so the
sediment buildup would occur in a similar way to the current channel.
3)
Adding a new channel north of Baton Rouge would
drain parts of both the Mississippi and Atchafalaya rivers and would
help to distribute sediment to the wetlands south and southeast of New
Orleans. It would improve conditions for flood
control in port cities along both rivers, including New Orleans and
Morgan City. Again, the amount of disruption caused
by relocation would be significantly greater than if an additional
distributary were dug south of New Orleans. If a
new channel were added north of Baton Rouge, it would take some of the
present strain off the Old River control structure, which is now
keeping the Mississippi river from changing its course entirely.
If left to the laws of nature, the Mississippi would
change its flow pattern and join with the Atchafalaya river, which has
a lower, more direct route to the sea.
The reasons this is problematic
are similar to those from item 2. Also, our new plan should
reduce the strain on the Old River control, a result of increased
erosion on the river bed. Refer to our current proposal for more
information.
|
|