1P-01 |
Policy of one side is repressive, providing few legitimate
channels of dissent |
1P-02 |
One side had been focusing on other disputes |
1P-03 |
Both sides extremely nationalistic |
1P-04 |
One side very nationalistic, other side much less so |
1P-05 |
Neither side very nationalistic |
1P-06 |
One side, having fought for independence, discounts
independence won by negotiations |
1P-07 |
One side's policies suggest orientation toward a neighboring
great power's enemies |
1P-08 |
Many on one side owe allegiance to an outside organization |
1P-09 |
The outnumbered side monopolizes the political, economic,
and social power and material benefits of the area |
1P-10 |
Leaders of one side preoccupied with consolidating internal
hegemony and restoring order |
1P-11 |
"Status quo" side is very cohesive |
1P-12 |
"Non-status quo" side is very cohesive |
1P-13 |
"Non-status quo" side's base of support is split |
1P-14 |
"Status quo" side's base of support is split |
1P-15 |
"Non-status quo" side's main vehicle of action
hitherto successful |
1P-16 |
"Non-status quo" side's main vehicle of action
hitherto unsuccessful |
1P-17 |
"Status quo" side provides more self-government to
"non-status quo" side |
1P-18 |
"Status quo" side denies more self-government to
"non-status quo" side |
1P-19 |
"Non-status quo" side seeks to intimidate its
potential base of support |
1P-20 |
"Non-status quo" side favors a popular front
approach |
1P-21 |
"Non-status quo" side shifts from popular front
approach to revolution |
1P-22 |
Moderate leaders of "non-status quo" side fear
appearing as weaker champions for change |
1P-23 |
"Status quo" leaders oppose overt action against
other side |
1P-24 |
"Non-status quo" leaders oppose overt action
against other side |
1P-25 |
"Status quo" side avoids direct provocation |
1P-26 |
Not all leaders of "non-status quo" side are
willing to use violent means |
1P-27 |
Unity of "non-status quo" side shaken by a
leadership crisis |
1P-28 |
Unity of "status quo" side shaken by a leadership
crisis |
1P-29 |
Internal political divisions within one side cause leaders
to seek a unifying issue |
1P-30 |
One side claims a "mission" to carry out its
policy |
1P-31 |
Style of leader of one side favors dramatic gestures |
1P-32 |
One side considers itself culturally superior |
1P-33 |
Public opinion in one side moves away from support of other
side to opposition |