| 1P-01 | Policy of one side is repressive, providing few legitimate
    channels of dissent | 
  
    | 1P-02 | One side had been focusing on other disputes | 
  
    | 1P-03 | Both sides extremely nationalistic | 
  
    | 1P-04 | One side very nationalistic, other side much less so | 
  
    | 1P-05 | Neither side very nationalistic | 
  
    | 1P-06 | One side, having fought for independence, discounts
    independence won by negotiations | 
  
    | 1P-07 | One side's policies suggest orientation toward a neighboring
    great power's enemies | 
  
    | 1P-08 | Many on one side owe allegiance to an outside organization | 
  
    | 1P-09 | The outnumbered side monopolizes the political, economic,
    and social power and material benefits of the area | 
  
    | 1P-10 | Leaders of one side preoccupied with consolidating internal
    hegemony and restoring order | 
  
    | 1P-11 | "Status quo" side is very cohesive | 
  
    | 1P-12 | "Non-status quo" side is very cohesive | 
  
    | 1P-13 | "Non-status quo" side's base of support is split | 
  
    | 1P-14 | "Status quo" side's base of support is split | 
  
    | 1P-15 | "Non-status quo" side's main vehicle of action
    hitherto successful | 
  
    | 1P-16 | "Non-status quo" side's main vehicle of action
    hitherto unsuccessful | 
  
    | 1P-17 | "Status quo" side provides more self-government to
    "non-status quo" side | 
  
    | 1P-18 | "Status quo" side denies more self-government to
    "non-status quo" side | 
  
    | 1P-19 | "Non-status quo" side seeks to intimidate its
    potential base of support | 
  
    | 1P-20 | "Non-status quo" side favors a popular front
    approach | 
  
    | 1P-21 | "Non-status quo" side shifts from popular front
    approach to revolution | 
  
    | 1P-22 | Moderate leaders of "non-status quo" side fear
    appearing as weaker champions for change | 
  
    | 1P-23 | "Status quo" leaders oppose overt action against
    other side | 
  
    | 1P-24 | "Non-status quo" leaders oppose overt action
    against other side | 
  
    | 1P-25 | "Status quo" side avoids direct provocation | 
  
    | 1P-26 | Not all leaders of "non-status quo" side are
    willing to use violent means | 
  
    | 1P-27 | Unity of "non-status quo" side shaken by a
    leadership crisis | 
  
    | 1P-28 | Unity of "status quo" side shaken by a leadership
    crisis | 
  
    | 1P-29 | Internal political divisions within one side cause leaders
    to seek a unifying issue | 
  
    | 1P-30 | One side claims a "mission" to carry out its
    policy | 
  
    | 1P-31 | Style of leader of one side favors dramatic gestures | 
  
    | 1P-32 | One side considers itself culturally superior | 
  
    | 1P-33 | Public opinion in one side moves away from support of other
    side to opposition |