| 1P-01 |
Policy of one side is repressive, providing few legitimate
channels of dissent |
| 1P-02 |
One side had been focusing on other disputes |
| 1P-03 |
Both sides extremely nationalistic |
| 1P-04 |
One side very nationalistic, other side much less so |
| 1P-05 |
Neither side very nationalistic |
| 1P-06 |
One side, having fought for independence, discounts
independence won by negotiations |
| 1P-07 |
One side's policies suggest orientation toward a neighboring
great power's enemies |
| 1P-08 |
Many on one side owe allegiance to an outside organization |
| 1P-09 |
The outnumbered side monopolizes the political, economic,
and social power and material benefits of the area |
| 1P-10 |
Leaders of one side preoccupied with consolidating internal
hegemony and restoring order |
| 1P-11 |
"Status quo" side is very cohesive |
| 1P-12 |
"Non-status quo" side is very cohesive |
| 1P-13 |
"Non-status quo" side's base of support is split |
| 1P-14 |
"Status quo" side's base of support is split |
| 1P-15 |
"Non-status quo" side's main vehicle of action
hitherto successful |
| 1P-16 |
"Non-status quo" side's main vehicle of action
hitherto unsuccessful |
| 1P-17 |
"Status quo" side provides more self-government to
"non-status quo" side |
| 1P-18 |
"Status quo" side denies more self-government to
"non-status quo" side |
| 1P-19 |
"Non-status quo" side seeks to intimidate its
potential base of support |
| 1P-20 |
"Non-status quo" side favors a popular front
approach |
| 1P-21 |
"Non-status quo" side shifts from popular front
approach to revolution |
| 1P-22 |
Moderate leaders of "non-status quo" side fear
appearing as weaker champions for change |
| 1P-23 |
"Status quo" leaders oppose overt action against
other side |
| 1P-24 |
"Non-status quo" leaders oppose overt action
against other side |
| 1P-25 |
"Status quo" side avoids direct provocation |
| 1P-26 |
Not all leaders of "non-status quo" side are
willing to use violent means |
| 1P-27 |
Unity of "non-status quo" side shaken by a
leadership crisis |
| 1P-28 |
Unity of "status quo" side shaken by a leadership
crisis |
| 1P-29 |
Internal political divisions within one side cause leaders
to seek a unifying issue |
| 1P-30 |
One side claims a "mission" to carry out its
policy |
| 1P-31 |
Style of leader of one side favors dramatic gestures |
| 1P-32 |
One side considers itself culturally superior |
| 1P-33 |
Public opinion in one side moves away from support of other
side to opposition |