1R-01 |
One side's previous support left a legacy of good will
between the two sides |
1R-02 |
One side seeks friendly relations with the other |
1R-03 |
Both sides had previously agreed to settle disputes
peaceably |
1R-04 |
The two sides are historic enemies |
1R-05 |
Border between sides is in dispute |
1R-06 |
Border between sides is clearly defined |
1R-07 |
Buffer area separates the two sides |
1R-08 |
No buffer area separates the two sides |
1R-09 |
One side is controlled politically by the other |
1R-10 |
One side is not controlled politically by the other |
1R-11 |
One side suspects intentions of the other |
1R-12 |
One side opposes the form of government of the other |
1R-13 |
One side sees other groups succeed against the other |
1R-14 |
One side had been historically dominant in area |
1R-15 |
Historically "non-status quo" side was the only
effective force in area |
1R-16 |
Leaders of one side are nostalgic over historical memory of
lost empire |
1R-17 |
One side's other preoccupations delay negotiations |
1R-18 |
One side's new leader identifies his predecessors' excesses
with the other side |
1R-19 |
Infiltrators of one side undermine political structure of
other side |
1R-20 |
One side does not openly support subversion in the other
side |
1R-21 |
"Status quo" side had succeeded in dealing with a
comparable threat elsewhere |
1R-22 |
The strongest force in "non-status quo" side is
linked to a superpower |
1R-23 |
"Non-status quo" side fears that "status
quo" side might foment separatism |