| 1R-01 | One side's previous support left a legacy of good will
    between the two sides | 
  
    | 1R-02 | One side seeks friendly relations with the other | 
  
    | 1R-03 | Both sides had previously agreed to settle disputes
    peaceably | 
  
    | 1R-04 | The two sides are historic enemies | 
  
    | 1R-05 | Border between sides is in dispute | 
  
    | 1R-06 | Border between sides is clearly defined | 
  
    | 1R-07 | Buffer area separates the two sides | 
  
    | 1R-08 | No buffer area separates the two sides | 
  
    | 1R-09 | One side is controlled politically by the other | 
  
    | 1R-10 | One side is not controlled politically by the other | 
  
    | 1R-11 | One side suspects intentions of the other | 
  
    | 1R-12 | One side opposes the form of government of the other | 
  
    | 1R-13 | One side sees other groups succeed against the other | 
  
    | 1R-14 | One side had been historically dominant in area | 
  
    | 1R-15 | Historically "non-status quo" side was the only
    effective force in area | 
  
    | 1R-16 | Leaders of one side are nostalgic over historical memory of
    lost empire | 
  
    | 1R-17 | One side's other preoccupations delay negotiations | 
  
    | 1R-18 | One side's new leader identifies his predecessors' excesses
    with the other side | 
  
    | 1R-19 | Infiltrators of one side undermine political structure of
    other side | 
  
    | 1R-20 | One side does not openly support subversion in the other
    side | 
  
    | 1R-21 | "Status quo" side had succeeded in dealing with a
    comparable threat elsewhere | 
  
    | 1R-22 | The strongest force in "non-status quo" side is
    linked to a superpower | 
  
    | 1R-23 | "Non-status quo" side fears that "status
    quo" side might foment separatism |