2D-01 |
"Status quo" side controls disputed area |
2D-02 |
"Non-status quo" side controls disputed area |
2D-03 |
The economic value to both sides of disputed area increases |
2D-04 |
The economic value to one side of disputed area increases |
2D-05 |
The disputed area does not have important economic value |
2D-06 |
"Status quo" side's strategic interest in disputed
area increases |
2D-07 |
"Non-status quo" side's strategic interest in
disputed area increases |
2D-08 |
"Status quo" side has military superiority in
disputed area |
2D-09 |
"Non-status quo" side has military superiority in
disputed area |
2D-10 |
One side increases its capability to deploy military forces
in disputed area |
2D-11 |
One side sends troops to disputed area |
2D-12 |
Both sides strengthen military forces in disputed area |
2D-13 |
"Status quo" side reinforces its garrison in
disputed area |
2D-14 |
There is a weak countervailing military force near disputed
area |
2D-15 |
One or both build border posts in territory claimed by the
other |
2D-16 |
One or both sides establish military posts in territory
claimed by the other |
2D-17 |
One side to the dispute reinforces its border garrisons |
2D-18 |
Both sides to the dispute reinforce their border garrisons |
2D-19 |
Minor incidents occur along the border between the two sides |
2D-20 |
The major allies of each side agree that disputed area is in
the sphere of influence of one of them |
2D-21 |
Allies disagree that disputed area is in one side's sphere
of influence |
2D-22 |
Strategic concerns require avoiding events in the disputed
area that would disturb great power relationships |
2D-23 |
The rights of minority groups in disputed area are
guaranteed |
2D-24 |
The rights of minority groups in disputed area are not
guaranteed |
2D-25 |
In disputed area popular sentiment overwhelmingly favors
change |
2D-26 |
A majority of the disputed area residents register their
desire to accede to the other side |
2D-27 |
One side follows a policy of toleration vis-a-vis political
groups in disputed area |
2D-28 |
One side follows a policy of repression against political
groups in disputed area |
2D-29 |
One side uses its military presence in disputed area to
pursue long-held ideological, political, economic, and strategic goals |
2D-30 |
One side engages in fomenting and encouraging rebellious
groups in the area |
2D-31 |
The proximity of one side to disputed area and its greater
power give it great influence |
2D-32 |
Ties of one side's leader's to disputed area make action
seem urgent |
2D-33 |
One side refuses to intervene in disputed area unless leader
in that area accedes to its demands |
2D-34 |
Incidents in disputed area increase in seriousness and
number |
2D-35 |
Little accurate information available to the sides about
situation in disputed area |
2D-36 |
Accurate information available to the sides about situation
in disputed area |