July - September 2000
Costs
of the Kyoto Protocol: A New Assessment
[Abstract]
Running
Buses on Hydrogen Fuel Cells:
Barriers and Opportunities
[Abstract]
News
Items
Publications
[Click
here]
[e-lab
Home Page] [Energy
Lab Home Page] [MIT Home Page]
.
n Energy Laboratory analysis suggests that enforcing the Kyoto Protocol
may not be as expensive as most people think--as long as countries follow
the intended guidelines. Most analyses consider the cost of reducing
only carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from fossil
fuel use. But the protocol also recognizes reductions in other greenhouse
gases (GHGs). According to the MIT analysis, taking advantage of opportunities
to reduce those gases as well as CO2 can cut the
cost of compliance in half. The protocol puts all gases on a common
basis by using "global warming potentials" (GWPs) to weight the value
of any emission reduction according to the gas's warming ability and
lifetime in the atmosphere. In theory, then, meeting the Kyoto targets
by cutting only CO2 or by cutting a combination
of gases weighted using their GWPs should give the same climate impacts.
To test the validity of the GWPs, the researchers used MIT's integrated
atmospheric chemistry, climate, and ecosystem model to simulate the
effects of the CO2-only and the multi-gas strategies
for meeting the Kyoto requirements. The predicted global warming was
similar for the two strategies. However, substantial differences appeared
when the two strategies were used in response to a hypothetical policy
involving deeper emissions cuts and participation by developing countries--assumptions
that increase the role played by non-CO2 emissions.
The GWPs are so flawed that such a stringent policy may or may not give
the intended climate results, depending on which types of emissions
are cut. The MIT team is now rethinking how to value emissions reductions,
including considerations such as the timing of the avoided damage and
the importance of protecting future generations from long-lived GHGs
put into the atmosphere now.
[Read
article] [Up]
.
ehicles running on fuel cells fed by hydrogen could be ideal environmentally
for crowded cities: they are quiet and clean, emitting none of the air
pollutants that now plague urban areas. And emissions of greenhouse
gases could be eliminated as well if the hydrogen were made using carbon-free
sources such as solar power. But figuring out how to deliver hydrogen
to private vehicles is a daunting problem, given today's fuel handling
and storage technologies. Energy Laboratory researchers have looked
at a more manageable application of this technology: in fleets of buses.
They focused on a demonstration in which the Sunline Transit Agency
in Los Angeles will gradually switch its buses from compressed natural
gas engines to fuel cells, powered first by commercially provided liquid
hydrogen and subsequently by compressed hydrogen gas that Sunline itself
will manufacture from natural gas. This commercial experience will help
clarify the issues involved in producing, handling, and storing hydrogen;
maintaining and operating vehicles; and providing a given level of service.
The MIT assessment identifies many of the practical hurdles Sunline
must overcome, from setting up its hydrogen fueling station to retraining
its managers and operators. Broader issues include the public's perception
of hydrogen fuel as dangerous; potentially high costs; and still-evolving
safety, zoning, and other regulations. Whether hydrogen will become
the clean transportation fuel of the future remains to be seen. But
if all goes as planned, Sunline's customers will get a first taste of
the potential benefits of this technology: clean, quiet buses that get
them where they need to go.
[Read
article] [Up]
[e-lab Home
Page]
Last updated: 02/2001
Copyright © Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2001. Material in this bulletin may be reproduced if credited to e-lab.
|