MIT Faculty Newsletter  
Vol. XXXI No. 4
March / April 2019
The Proposed New Review Process
for Outside Funders and MIT's
Governance Problem
A 21st Century Education at MIT
March 4, 1969 Scientists Strike for Peace:
50 Years Later
An Open Letter to the MIT Corporation
FNL Elects Four New and One
Returning Editorial Board Members
Open Access Task Force
Draft Recommendations
The Octopus
Progress Towards an Improved
Undergraduate First-Year Experience
Update on the Academic Climate Survey
Undergraduate Admissions:
A Recommendation
Public Forums at the
Center for International Studies
International Collaborations and
Donations to the Endowment
Faculty Responses to the
2019 Academic Climate Survey
Printable Version

An Open Letter to the MIT Corporation


Dear Members of the MIT Corporation:

We are members of the MIT community concerned about MIT’s relationship with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and its state-controlled subsidiaries. Saudi Arabia is an authoritarian state with one of the worst human-rights records in the world. Its shameful record is by now familiar from international press coverage: thousands of deaths and millions on the brink of famine in the Yemeni Civil War since 2015; the 2018 assassination of journalist Jamal Khashoggi in the Saudi embassy in Istanbul; and the list goes on. Collaborative agreements with an authoritarian state with this record are antithetical to the mission, interests, and values of MIT and of open, democratic, societies worldwide. MIT’s choice on this issue should take into account the needs and interests not only of researchers and students at MIT, but of those directly affected by Saudi Arabia’s actions: civilians being bombed in Yemenwomen activists being tortured for their efforts to secure basic civil rights, and the millions of children at risk of starvation.

After the assassination of Jamal Khashoggi, President Reif solicited input from the MIT community on MIT’s engagements with Saudi Arabia. A subsequent report by Associate Provost Richard Lester states that 74% of MIT faculty who submitted comments either strongly objected or leaned against continuing engagements with Saudi Arabia, alongside 76% of non-faculty commenters. Yet MIT continues to accept funding from the Saudi Arabian government and government-controlled sources at the level of ~$8 million per year. The Saudi Arabia controversy underscores the need to build ethical principles deeply and fundamentally into MIT's international engagement policy. 

Given the gravity of Saudi Arabia’s human rights violations, we urge the Corporation to heed the judgment of a significant majority of those who weighed in, and to end MIT’s relationship with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

We call upon MIT to:

  1. Terminate all sponsored research programs, partnerships, investments, and financial engagements with Saudi AramcoSABIC, and KACST. These are state-controlled entities that do not serve a primarily educational mission. MIT’s relations with these entities impugn the good name of the Institute and, by association, lends its prestige to the Saudi regime and risks being counted among its allies.
  2. Provide a transparent justification for why continuing any other relationship with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is consistent with the values of the MIT community. This should take the form of a clear, detailed, and publicly accessible account of MIT’s relationship with each remaining major Saudi sponsor, university, or donor, with avenues for MIT community input. We ask that the MIT Faculty Policy Committee, in coordination with the MIT International Advisory Committee, be charged with this task. If no such justification is possible, end the relationship.
  3. Provide funds and resources to fully replace Saudi funding for any faculty member or student reliant on it. Continue to welcome students and researchers from Saudi Arabia to our campus, as we would students and researchers from any other country, and provide financial aid as appropriate.
  4. Present to the MIT community a comprehensive statement on MIT’s “Ethics of Engagement.” This statement should address both research partnerships and endowment investments. It should describe the decision-making process regarding the ethics of investment in and engagement with companies, governments, and individuals; identify the MIT offices and individuals who are responsible for making such decisions; and clarify what avenues the broader MIT community has for providing input on these decisions.

MIT has power to make a difference in the world, but not only through its ability to support science and engineering. It is a powerful symbol of credibility and integrity. We object to MIT’s ongoing relations with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in our name.

Editor’s Note: At press time the above letter had already been signed by 233 members of the MIT community. To add your name to the list of signatories click here.

Back to top
Send your comments