Working Papers / Published Papers / Data 

Uncertainty Betas and International Capital Flows 
 With Francois Gourio and Michael Siemer. September 2014, pdf.

Abstract: This paper proposes a novel measure of country risk, the uncertainty beta, which is obtained by regressing on a rolling window the realized volatility of a country's stock market return on the world stock market volatility. In the data, a shock to global volatility reduces the capital inflows from foreigners, especially in the countries with the highest uncertainty betas. At the same time, the domestic residents of highest beta countries sell more foreign assets, and thus the effect on net capital flows is subdued. Investment and GDP fall significantly more in these countries than in low uncertainty beta countries. These differences across countries are statistically significant in a large panel of 35 countries over the last 40 years. A simple portfolio choice model illustrates the impact of uncertainty on gross capital flows: in the model, foreigners are exposed to expropriation risk. In times of high uncertainty, the expropriation risk increases and foreigners sell the domestic assets to the domestic investors, leading to a countercyclical home bias.

The International CAPM Redux 
 With Francesca Brusa and Tarun Ramadorai. First version: June 2014; This version: November 2014, pdf (appendix)

Abstract: This paper presents new evidence that international investors are compensated for bearing currency risk. We present a new threefactor international capital asset pricing model, comprising a global equity factor denominated in local currencies, and two currency factors, dollar and carry. The model is able to explain a wide crosssection of equity returns from 46 developed and emerging countries from 1976 to the present, is also useful at explaining the risks of international mutual funds and hedge funds, and outperforms standard models proposed in the international asset pricing literature. We rationalize our findings with a simple model of endogenous exchange rate risk in complete markets, and identify the critical importance of accounting for timevariation in risk exposures.

The Term Structure of Currency Carry Trade Risk Premia 
 With Hanno Lustig and Andreas Stathopoulos. First version: May 2013; This version: Mars 2015, pdf
(appendix)

Abstract: High interest rate currencies yield high currency excess returns on shortterm Treasury bill investments, but they tend to yield low local excess returns on longterm government bonds. At longer maturities, the low term premium offsets the high currency risk premium. In the absence of arbitrage opportunities, this exact result obtains when the martingale components of the pricing kernels are the same across countries. In this case, exchange rates are stationary and uncovered interest rate parity holds at long horizons. We derive parametric restrictions to match the downward sloping term structure of carry trade risk premia in multicountry affine term structure models.

The Share of Systematic Risk in Bilateral Exchange Rates 
 February 2015, pdf (appendix, data)

Abstract: Two factors account for 20% to 90% of the daily, monthly, quarterly, and annual exchange rate movements. These two factors  carry and dollar  are risk factors: the former accounts for the crosssection of interest ratesorted currency returns, while the latter accounts for a novel crosssection of dollar betasorted currency returns. They point to large differences across countries in their shares of systematic currency risk, and suggest that at least two global shocks are necessary to describe exchange rates.

Sovereign Risk Premia 
 With Nicola Borri, March 2012 pdf (appendix, data).
 Winner of the WRDS Best Paper Award, EFM 2010.

Abstract: Emerging countries tend to default when their economic conditions worsen. If harsh economic conditions in an emerging country correspond to similar conditions for the U.S. investor, then foreign sovereign bonds are particularly risky. We explore how this mechanism impacts the data and influences a general equilibrium model of optimal borrowing and default. Empirically, the higher the correlation between past foreign bond and U.S. market returns, the higher the average sovereign excess returns. In the model, sovereign defaults and bond prices depend not only on the borrowers' economic conditions, but also on the lenders' timevarying risk aversion.


Crash Risk in Currency Markets 
 With Emmanuel Farhi, Samuel Fraiberger, Xavier Gabaix and Romain Ranciere, May 2014, pdf (appendix).

Abstract: Outofthemoney currency options point to large expected exchange rate depreciations for high interest rate currencies, suggesting that disaster risk is priced in currency markets. To study the price of disaster risk, we propose a simple structural model that includes both Gaussian and disaster risk and can be estimated even in samples that do not contain disasters. Estimating the model over the 1996 to 2013 period using
monthly exchange rate spot, forward, and option data, we obtain a realtime index of the compensation for global disaster risk exposure. We find that disaster risk accounts for almost a third of average currency carry trade excess returns in advanced countries over the period. We document that after the fall of 2008 options prices exhibit a sharp increase in tail risk, similar to the emergence of the smirk in equity options after the 1987 crash.

Published Papers

Countercyclical Currency Risk Premia 
 With Hanno Lustig and Nikolai Roussanov, Journal of Financial Economics, March 2014, Vol. 111 (3), pp. 527553, pdf.

Abstract: We describe a novel currency investment strategy, the ‘dollar carry trade,’ which delivers large excess returns, uncorrelated with the returns on wellknown carry trade strategies. Using a noarbitrage model of exchange rates we show that these excess returns compensate U.S. investors for taking on aggregate risk by shorting the dollar in bad times, when the U.S. price of risk is high. The countercyclical variation in risk premia leads to strong return predictability: the average forward discount and U.S. industrial production growth rates forecast up to 25% of the dollar return variation at the oneyear horizon. The estimated model implies that the variation in the exposure of U.S. investors to worldwide risk is the key driver of predictability.

The WealthConsumption Ratio 
 With Hanno Lustig and Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh, Review of Asset Pricing, June 2013, Vol. 3 (1), pp 3894, pdf.

Abstract: We set up an exponentially affine stochastic discount factor model for bond yields and
stock returns in order to estimate the prices of aggregate risk. We use the estimated risk prices
to compute the noarbitrage price of a claim to aggregate consumption. The pricedividend
ratio of this claim is the wealthconsumption ratio. Our estimates indicate that total wealth
is much safer than stock market wealth. The consumption risk premium is only 2.2 percent,
substantially below the equity risk premium of 6.9 percent. As a result, the average US
household has more wealth than one might think; most of it is human wealth. Nearly all of
the variation in total wealth can be traced back to changes in longterm real interest rates.
Contrary to conventional wisdom, we find that events in bond markets, not stock markets,
matter most for understanding fluctuations in total wealth.

International Risk Cycles 
 With Francois Gourio and Michael Siemer, Journal of International Economics, March 2013, Vol. 89, pp. 471484, pdf (appendix).

Abstract: This paper studies a twocountry real business cycle model with two novel features: (1) exogenous shocks to worldwide uncertainty, (2) heterogeneous exposures of countries to a world aggregate shock. When world risk increases, investment falls and a worldwide recession ensues, even in the absence of technology shocks. Equity prices and interest rates fall, especially in the more risky country, and the high interest rate currency depreciates. The model generates a low correlation between relative consumption growth and exchange rates, a large forward premium, and "excess comovement" of asset prices relative to quantities. Empirically, we measure the response of macroeconomic aggregates and exchange rates to an aggregate volatility shock, and nd support for the model mechanism.

Business Cyclical Variation in the RiskReturn Tradeoff 
 With Hanno Lustig, Journal of Monetary Economics, December 2012, Vol. 59, pp. 3549, pdf (appendix).

Abstract: We measure the variation in realized returns in bond and equity markets over the business cycle. In each of these markets, the equity, government bond and corporate bond markets, the realized Sharpe ratio is much higher in recessions than in expansions. However, the variation in realized Sharpe ratios during expansions (recessions) differs across securities markets. The realized Sharpe ratio on equity increases monotonically during recessions to reach a maximum of 1.1 at the trough of a business cycle, and it declines monotonically during expansions to reach a minimum of 0.2 at the peak. In bond markets, the realized Sharpe ratios are lowest (highest) at the trough (peak) and increase (decrease) almost monotonically during expansions (recessions), with values ranging from 0 to 0.7. These results are consistent with large increases (decreases) in actual equity risk premia and Sharpe ratios during recessions (expansions).

Common Risk Factors in Currency Markets 
 With Hanno Lustig and Nikolai Roussanov, Review of Financial Studies, November 2011, Vol. 24 (11), pp. 37313777, (pdf, data).
 Winner of the Terker Prize in Investment Research, 2009.

Abstract: We identify a `slope' factor in exchange rates. High interest rate currencies load more on this slope factor than low interest rate currencies. As a result, this factor can account for most of the crosssectional variation in average excess returns between high and low interest rate currencies. A standard, noarbitrage model of interest rates with two factors  a countryspecific factor and a global factor  can replicate these findings, provided there is sufficient heterogeneity in exposure to global or common innovations. We show that our slope factor identifies these common shocks, and we provide empirical evidence that it is related to changes in global equity market volatility. By investing in high interest rate currencies and borrowing in low interest rate currencies, US investors load up on global risk.

The CrossSection of Foreign Currency Risk Premia and US Consumption Growth Risk: A Reply 
 With Hanno Lustig. American Economic Review, December 2011, Vol. 101, pp. 34773500 (pdf).

Abstract: The consumption growth beta of an investment strategy that goes long in high interest rate currencies and short in low interest rate currencies is large and significant. The price of consumption risk is significantly different from zero, even after accounting for the sampling uncertainty introduced by the estimation of the consumption betas. The constant in the regression of average returns on consumption betas is not significant. In addition, the consumption and market betas of this investment strategy increase during recessions and times of crisis, when risk prices are high, implying that the unconditional betas understate its riskiness. We use the recent crisis as an example.

Information Shocks, Liquidity Shocks, Jumps, and Price Discovery: Evidence from the U.S. Treasury Market 
 With George J. Jiang and Ingrid Lo, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 46, No. 2, Apr. 2011, pp. 527–551 (pdf).
 Abstract: In this paper, we identify jumps in U.S. Treasurybond (Tbond) prices and investigate the causes of such unexpected large price changes. In particular, we examine the relative importance of macroeconomic news announcements versus variation in market liquidity in explaining the observed jumps in the U.S. Treasury market. We show that while jumps occur mostly at prescheduled macroeconomic announcement times, announcement surprises have limited power in explaining bond price jumps. Our analysis further shows that pre announcement liquidity shocks, such as changes in the bidask spread and market depth, have significant predictive power for jumps. The predictive power is significant even after controlling for information shocks. Finally, we present evidence that postjump order flow is less informative relative to the case where there is no jump at announcement.

LongRun Risk, the WealthConsumption Ratio, and the Temporal Pricing of Risk 
 With Ralph Koijen, Hanno Lustig, and Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, May 2010, Vol. 100, No 2, pp 552556 (pdf).
 Abstract: We show that the longrun risk model, which is successful at matching the wealthconsumption ratio, high equity risk premium and the nominal yields at
short maturities implies too little (much) variation in the martingale component of the nominal (real) pricing kernel. This is because the nominal bond risk premium at infinite horizon is too high, or in other words because the real bond risk premium at infinite horizon is too low and thus the inflation risk premium too high. We conclude that the wealthconsumption ratio, the equity risk premium, and the long horizon bond risk premium impose tight restrictions on dynamic asset pricing models.
 Appendix (pdf).

A HabitBased Explanation of the Exchange Rate Risk Premium 

First Version: November 2003, This Version: October 2008, pdf.

Journal of Finance, February 2010, Vol. 65, No 1, pp 123145.

Abstract: This paper presents a model that reproduces the uncovered interest rate parity puzzle using on endogenous countercyclical risk premia and procyclical real interest rates. Investors have preferences with external habits. During bad times at home, when domestic consumption is close to the habit level, the pricing kernel is volatile, and the representative investor is very riskaverse. When the domestic investor is more riskaverse than her foreign counterpart, the exchange rate is closely tied to domestic consumption growth shocks, and the domestic investor expects a positive currency excess return. Since interest rates are low in bad times, expected currency excess returns increase with interest rate differentials.
 Appendix (pdf) : In this appendix, I derive the optimal foreign and domestic consumption
allocations in a twocountry model where agents are characterized by
habit preferences. Agents can trade, but incur proportional and
quadratic trade costs. This model replicates the empirical forward
premium and equity premium puzzle and the interest rates and
exchange rates' volatility. Finally, I investigate the role of non
tradable goods on the correlation between exchange rates and
consumption growth rates.

The CrossSection of Foreign Currency Risk Premia and US Consumption Growth Risk 
 With Hanno Lustig. American Economic Review, March 2007, vol. 97, No 1, pp 89117, pdf.

Abstract: Aggregate consumption growth risk explains why low interest rate currencies do not appreciate as much as the interest rate differential and why high interest rate currencies do not depreciate as much as the interest rate differential. We sort foreign currency returns into portfolios based on foreign interest rates, and we test the Euler equation of a domestic investor who invests in these currency portfolios. We find that domestic investors earn negative excess returns on low interest rate currency portfolios and positive excess returns on high interest rate currency portfolios. Because high interest rate currencies depreciate on average when domestic consumption growth is low and low interest rate currencies do not under the same conditions, low interest rate currencies provide domestic investors with a hedge against domestic aggregate consumption growth risk.
 Data.
 Reply to Burnside, American Economic Review, December 2011, Vol. 101, pp 34773500.

Investing in Foreign Currency is like Betting on your Intertemporal Marginal Rate of Substitution. 
 With Hanno Lustig. Journal of the European Economic Association, Papers and Proceedings, AprilMay 2006, Vol. 4, No. 23, pp 644655, pdf.

Abstract: Investors earn positive excess returns on high interest rate foreign discount bonds, because these currencies appreciate on average. Lustig and Verdelhan (2005) show that investing in high interest rate foreign discount bonds exposes them to more aggregate consumption risk, while low interest rate foreign bonds provide a hedge. This paper provides a simple model that replicates these facts. Investing in foreign currency is like betting on the difference between your own intertemporal; marginal rate of substitution (IMRS) and your neighbor's IMRS. These bets are very risky if your neighbor's IMRS is not correlated with yours, but they provide a hedge when his IMRS is highly correlated and more volatile. If the foreign neighbors that face low interest rates also have more volatile and correlated IMRS, that accounts for the spread in excess returns in the data.
 