General Information
MIT catalog description
Prereq.: 6.004 (and, by implication, 6.001 and 6.002)
U (2)
5-0-7
CI-M
Topics on the engineering of computer software and hardware
systems: techniques for controlling complexity; strong modularity
using client-server design, virtual memory, and threads; networks;
atomicity and coordination of parallel activities; recovery and
reliability; privacy, security, and encryption; and impact of
computer systems on society. Case studies of working systems and
readings from the current literature provide comparisons and
contrasts. Two design projects. Students engage in extensive
written communication exercises. Enrollment may be limited. 4
Engineering Design Points.
Underground Reviews (require an MIT personal certificate):
2010,
2009,
2008,
2007,
2006,
2005,
2004,
2003,
2002,
2001,
2000,
1999,
1998,
1997,
1996
Announcements
For announcements and assignments, the Web is our authoritative
form of communication. We expect students to check the 6.033 home
page for both news and assignments regularly, every couple of
days. If you hear a rumor, check it there.
MIT Web Certificates
Access to a number of documents on the course web site is
restricted to its students, using MIT Web
Certificates. Protected documents include some of the reading
materials with copyright restrictions, and the recitation/tutorial
assignments.
Grading Policy
Your final 6.033 grade will have the following components:
17.5% | DP1 Report (half technical, half writing) |
17.5% | DP2 Report |
20% | Technical Section Participation and Weekly Assignments |
5% | Writing Section Participation |
40% | Quizzes |
Note that over a third of your grade comes from written assignments:
we expect you to take writing seriously in this class.
Section Evaluation
The section part of your grade reflects your overall level of
participation in recitation and tutorial as well as a series of
weekly hands-on projects that support recitation. Section
instructors will base at least half of the evaluation on your
communication skills: oral communication skills as observed in
recitation paper discussions in class and written communication
skills as evaluated by your instructor and your teaching
assistant. The remainder of your section grade is based
on the quality and enthusiasm of your participation, your
understanding of the papers, and on whether you handed in the
assignments, since the exercises aid your ability to discuss the
papers.
During most weeks, you will be expected to complete a hands-on
experiment that requires a computer, usually an Athena
workstation, and sometimes using the Web. The idea is to reinforce
some of the abstract concepts from the lectures or papers that
week and find out how things really work. These assignments
generally do not require programming.
A portion of your grade will also be based on your participation
in writing tutorials and on your communication and
interaction with your writing instructor.
Design Projects
The final result of each of the two design projects will be an
extended
paper in which you describe a detailed system design to solve a
real-world problem. There will be two design projects, each of
which will extend over roughly half the semester. The first will
be an individual project; the second will be done in teams of
three students from the same recitation.
The first design paper will be graded by both your recitation instructor and
the Communication Department, as described in the section on writing requirements.
One of the teaching assistants' primary roles is to tie the design
projects into the topics covered in lectures and recitations. On
most Fridays, they will be teaching "tutorials" to explain the
design projects' requirements and some of the tradeoffs inherent
in the projects. Like lectures and recitations, these tutorials
are required. Students are also welcome to ask questions about
the design projects during TA office hours.
A couple of weeks into each design project, you'll be asked to
hand in a short design proposal. We'll evaluate this to make sure
you're on the right track and to suggest writing improvements, but
it will only count against the project grade if you fail to hand
it in. We'll also discuss common mistakes during tutorial. Both
design project proposals will be forwarded to the writing program,
and be graded according to the description in the writing requirements section.
Quizzes
Two quizzes are held during the term. A third quiz (1.5 hours in
length) will be scheduled during finals week. Each quiz will focus
on a third of the class's material, but keep in mind that later
topics in 6.033 build heavily upon the earlier topics. The quizzes
count as follows: 12.5% quiz, 12.5% quiz 2, and 15% quiz 3.
Late Policy
You must hand in assignments when they are due, and you must attend
quizzes at the scheduled times. If you feel you have a compelling
reason for not handing in an assignment on time, or for not attending
a quiz, please talk to your recitation instructor or one of the
lecturers in advance. If you miss an assignment deadline, you should
still hand in the assignment; we'll give you feedback even though we
won't give you credit for your final grade. Furthermore, doing assignments is the best
way to prepare for exams and design projects.
Collaboration
You may not collaborate on quizzes.
On all other assignments you are
welcome to discuss ideas with others, but
your writing should be your own and you should acknowledge
all contributions of ideas by others, whether
from classmates or from papers you have read.
Class meetings
Lectures will be held on Mondays and Wednesdays from 2:00pm-3:00pm
in 32-123. Recitations are on Tuesdays
and Thursdays. Friday sessions will usually be tutorials, but we use some of the Friday
hours for lectures by the staff of the M.I.T. Communication
Program, and some for quizzes. See the
schedule for the exact dates of these events.
Session |
Time |
Location |
Instructor |
Lecture |
MW2-3 |
32-123 |
Kaashoek and Zeldovich |
Writing Program Recitations |
see schedule |
see schedule |
Caulfield, Unger, Volaitis, Melvold, Pepper |
Recitation |
TR, section dependent |
section dependent |
Katabi, Lampson, Ports, Strauss |
Tutorial |
F, section dependent |
section dependent |
Pesterev, Narula, Raza, Mutiso |
These four types of sessions are all required. For the
first recitation, attend whichever one you want. After that, you
will be assigned a permanent recitation.
For details about your recitation and tutorial time and place,
consult the recitation and tutorial
assignments.
Staff
Lectures |
Name |
E-Mail |
Office |
Telephone |
|
Frans Kaashoek |
kaashoek at csail.mit.edu |
32-G992 |
x3-7149 |
Nickolai Zeldovich |
nickolai at csail.mit.edu |
32-G994 |
x3-6005 |
|
Recitations |
Name |
E-Mail |
Office |
Telephone |
|
Dina Katabi |
dina at csail.mit.edu |
|
|
Butler Lampson |
Butler.Lampson at microsoft.com |
|
|
Dan Ports |
drkp at mit.edu |
|
|
Jacob Strauss |
jastr at csail.mit.edu |
|
|
|
Teaching assistants
Office hours are held in 32-G950 (the lounge outside the elevators)
|
Name |
E-Mail |
Office |
Office Hours |
Neha Narula |
narula at mit.edu |
32-G980 |
Wednesday 4-5 PM |
Syed Raza |
raza at mit.edu |
32-G950 |
Wednesday 3-4 PM |
Herman Mutiso |
hmutiso at mit.edu |
32-G950 |
Tuesday 3-4 PM |
Alex Pesterev |
alekseyp at mit.edu |
32-G980 |
Tuesday 5-6 PM |
|
Writing program |
Name |
E-Mail |
Office |
Telephone |
|
Mary Caulfield |
mcaulf at mit.edu |
12-113 |
x3-3039 |
Donald Unger |
donunger at mit.edu |
12-112 |
x3-3039 |
Lydia Volaitis |
lydiav at mit.edu |
12-112 |
x3-3039 |
Janice Melvold |
melvold at mit.edu |
14N-322 |
x5-5194 |
Karen Pepper |
kpepper at mit.edu |
12-111 |
x4-2218 |
Course staff mailing list: 6.033-staff at mit.edu.
Use this mailing list to contact all the 6.033 staff members.
Communication Intensive Recitations
MIT faculty and department members believe
that students in any field should learn to write prose that is clear, organized, and eloquent, and to marshal facts and
ideas into convincing written and oral presentations.
MIT implemented the
Communication Requirement in 2000 in response to alumni feedback. Alumni said
that they had received an outstanding technical education at MIT but needed
more training in writing and speaking to succeed in their professional careers.
The 6.033 faculty have worked
with the MIT Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) program
for more than 10 years to design 6.033 writing and speaking assignments. We
have chosen assignments that are similar to the kinds of writing you will do in
the engineering workplace: memos, proposals, design reports, and design
presentations.
To assist you in preparing for
the written assignments, several of the Friday recitations will focus on
communication instruction. At these recitations, you will receive advice on how
to write your one-page assignments, DP1 proposal, and DP1 from a Writing
Recitation instructor. Attendance to the writing recitations will be included
in your final overall recitation grade.
Your Writing Recitation instructor will comment on and grade three of
your written assignments:
- Therac-25 written assignment (one-page memo #1)
- Design proposal for Design Project 1 (DP1 Proposal)
- Design Project 1 (DP1)
Writing grades will be assigned according to a set of criteria that will be provided
as a part of each writing assignment.
The Therac-25 writing grade is advisory; it will not affect your final 6.033
grade.
For design project 1, your recitation instructor and writing instructor
will work together to assign your final grade, with approximately equal
weight being given to writing and technical portions of the grade.
You will be given the opportunity to revise your design project to improve
your writing grade, with revisions due approximately one week after the
design project is handed back.
According to the Communication Requirement webpage
6.033 satisfies CI-M for Course 2A, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6A, 18-General, 18-Theory,
18-Applied, and 18-C. If you are not in these programs, 6.033 does not
satisfy the CI-M requirement for you.
Writing Prizes
The EECS department hands out a
few awards for excellent papers for Design Project 1. Outstanding Design
Projects are nominated by technical and/or writing faculty. Every submitted
design paper is eligible for an award; the final decision is made by the 6.033
and writing staff based on both technical content and writing quality.
|