Our Solution

Building Codes  & Green Architecture

Minimizing Flood and Wind Damages

 

Flood Damage

 

             While there is a constant threat of flooding in New Orleans, there have been relatively few floods in New Orleans. Between Hurricane Camille in 1969 and Hurricane Katrina in 2005, both of caused major damage, there have only been 3 significant hurricane-related floods within the three and half decades period. Floods from the Mississippi River is also a risk; however, we believe that with the levee system designed by Team 3 and adjustments for the Mississippi River system designed by Team 9, the chance of a large flood from the Mississippi River is relatively small. Because flooding does not happen on an annual or even a two year basis, we believe that it is unnecessary and impractical to require expensive flood-proof buildings for a largely low-income city. Instead, we want to create practical building codes that will minimize the damage caused by flood and wind.

We have found that the 1.5 feet Base Flood Elevation requirements mandated by FEMA are relatively inconsequential for protecting homes on a year to year basis. The most recent flood before Hurricane Katrina was on May 8th, 1995 when certain areas of New Orleans flooded as much as 19 inches as a result of rain, not a tropical storm (Marcus, 1995. pA18). While certain buildings may have been protected by the required 1.5 feet elevation, most of the buildings were not even protected because over 90% of the houses in New Orleans were built before 1984 (GNOCDC, 2000). New Orleans flooded not as a result of levee overtopping or breaches but because water could not be pumped out of the city quickly enough. However, floods result of rain only happen on average every 10 years. The two floods before May 8th, 1995 in the 1980s and 1970s were not as severe as the flood in 1995. A 1.5 feet base flood elevation costs on average over $40,000 per house for already existing homes (FOX News, 2006. par 19).  Because of the spaced out occurrence between the recent floods, we believe that even for building a new house the cost for raising houses 1.5 feet or more above ground level and for enforcement of that code outweighs the benefits of preventing minor damages in small floods.

Post-Katrina, FEMA has mandated a 3 feet BFE for homes in New Orleans. Raising a home by three feet raises the cost of building the home by $48,000 for already existing homes (FOX New, 2006. par. 19). By the same argument against 1.5 BFE cost-benefit arguments, we believe that the three feet BFE is not a practical solution for the people of New Orleans and their homes. Even against larger floods like the ones against Hurricane Katrina or Hurricane Camille, which flooded the city by up to, the three feet was completely inconsequential in protecting homes against flood. The Base Flood Elevation will not benefit the people in the city of New Orleans enough to justify the continuation of this law.

Instead of raising the buildings by 1.5 or 3 feet which fails to minimize damage or protect houses against floods, we propose a First Floor Plan establish a way to greatly reduce the damage that can be done to a family’s property. The First Floor Plan will limit the amount of furniture and belongings on the first floor of home. We recommended homeowner to either turn the first flood into mainly a garage or if they choose to make the first floor into a living room, to use tiles or hardwood floor instead of carpeting. We hope that through this plan will minimize a household’s losses caused by flood. To enforce this plan, we will enforce a $5,000 cap on the amount that NFIP will reimburse the homeowner for his belongings on the first floor. If the homeowner chooses to put more than $5,000 dollar value, he/she will still only be reimbursed $5,000. While this may seem harsh, it will limit the amount of losses for each household by discouraging placing expensive items on the first floor. This plan does not “raise” the house by 10 feet, but will minimize the amount of damage done to the house for up to 10 feet of flooding. Since homeowner’s do not have to elevate their houses, we believe that this plan is economically practical. We also believe that this plan is practical given the rarity of floods especially with improvement of levees to withstand up to Category 5 storms.

 

Wind Damage

Wind damage from Hurricane Katrina affected most of the homes in New Orleans. According to FEMA’s HAZUS Hurricane model analyzed by Louisiana State University Hurricane Center, more than 80% of houses in New Orleans reported at least minor damage, which is defined by “maximum of one broken window, door or garage door. Moderate roof cover..Marks or dents on walls requiring painting or patching for repair” (LSU, 2005. 3). Their study was conducted with FEMA’s HAZUS Hurricane model.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

            

 

 

We strongly recommend but will not required the suggestions given by LSU Hurricane Center:

 

· Protection of Building Openings

Windows and doors are the weak spots in the wall envelope. Requiring debris impact

resistant windows and doors or debris impact protective coverings (shutters) prevents

most window and door failures. This helps keep the wind and rain out of the building,

reducing structural damage, damage to finishes, and damage to contents.

· Improved Roof Sheathing Attachment

Better attachment of the plywood or OSB roof sheathing to the roof structure through

appropriate fasteners and closer fastener spacing helps prevent sections of the roof deck

from being lifted off by the wind. This reduces progressive failures and wind and water

from penetrating the building envelope.

· Improved Roof-Wall Connections

Installation of metal ‘hurricane clips’ or’ hurricane straps’ provides a continuous load

path from the roof to the foundation, helping prevent catastrophic roof uplift failures.

· Secondary Waterproofing to Roof Joints

Sealing the joints between the sheets of roof decking provides a second line of defense

against roof leaks, even if the roof coverings are damaged or destroyed.

                                                    (LSU, 2005. 6)

 

Since employing these recommendations will reduce the insurance rates, we feel that these codes do not need to be actively enforced through inspections. For households who would to  but cannot afford to build their homes with these recommendations, loans for remodeling are available to them through FEMA. We feel that these recommendations practical for homes in New Orleans and can significantly reduce damage to the home itself and all surrounding homes.

 

 

Green Architecture/Technology & Energy Codes

 

We want to promote New Orleans as a “Green New Orleans, Garden City”. This
plan for a greener New Orleans sets a precedent for a cleaner lifestyle that
includes awareness of the importance of energy efficiency and green technology.
Energy Star, a joint program between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
and the U.S. Department of Energy, promotes the ideal of reducing energy use
and increasing energy efficiency through designating products that meet its
strict energy efficiency guidelines as ones earning Energy Star approval.
(Energy Star, 2006)

The Energy Star program will usher in a green post-Katrina era where lush garden
homes and low rise apartments fill the protected neighborhoods. We advocate the
adoption of this program solely applicable to appliances as a requirement for
all homeowners in Louisiana.

The Energy Star program is a cut above the Leadership in Energy and
Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System, which currently
serves as the ?nationally accepted benchmark for the design, construction,
and operation of high performance green buildings.? The two systems can
coexist because unlike the Energy Star program, the U.S. Green Building Council
(USGBC) does not certify products and services of individual companies. The
Energy Star program and LEED complement each other as LEED ?provides a road
map for measuring and documenting success for every building type and phase of
a building life cycle.? The portion of the Energy Star program we want to
enforce solely applies to products and services not certified by the USGBC with
examples including geothermal/geoexchange heat pumps and commercial & industrial
transformers.

We would also like to encourage, not enforce, the construction of roof gardens.
Best implemented in low density apartments, these gardens would control the
rate of storm runoff, reduce the heat load on these buildings, and also reduce
monthly utility costs.

House Bill No. 498 by Representative Barrow creates green building standards up
to the LEED silver standard for public buildings. (Barrow, 2006) While this
piece of legislation steps towards a more energy efficient New Orleans, we
envision the complementary incorporation of Energy Star standards for
appliances. Also, we would like to see the implementation of the LEED silver
standard to the private housing market. The Louisiana Department of Natural
Resources offers software that individuals can use to determine the number of
credits their home qualifies for and therefore which certification level their
home meets under the LEED standard.

Under the HELP program, ?homeowners can get reduced interest home improvement
loans to make energy-related improvements to their existing homes. DNR will
finance half of the improvements at two percent interest, up to a maximum of
$6,000 on the DNR portion.? For the person who takes out the loan, the
borrower can obtain a ?Home Energy Rating by an Energy Rated Homes of
Louisiana Home Energy Rater.?

With all this legislative infrastructure concerning green technology and energy
codes, we believe New Orleans is well-positioned to transform into an
environmentally friendly city.

 

Source: LSU Hurricane Center