LBRC outside projects
Cell growth cycle using dry mass measurements
The regulation of cell size is a fundamental property of cellular life. Dysfunction of the signaling pathways controlling cell growth results in cells of altered size and can lead to developmental errors, contributing to a wide variety of conditions, including cancer, diabetes, and inflammation.
In a steady state cell population, cell growth is coordinated with cell cycle progression, that is, the cellular biomass doubles in quantity during each cell cycle, so that the average cell size is constant over time. Prior research studies on yeast cell growth show that there are internal mechanisms to achieve this [1, 2]. In metazoan cells, there is some evidence that cell growth and cell cycle may be independently regulated [2, 3]. However, both the phenomenon and its biochemical circuit are only poorly understood, and the existing observations of mammalian cell growth deduced contradictory models. For example, it is known that primary rat Schwann cells exhibit a growth rate that is independent of cell size [3], while mouse lymphoblastoid cells grow exponentially with time [4]. This discrepancy may reflect the difference between cell types or the experimental conditions, and for further understanding of metazoan cell growth, it is essential to make more experimental observations of the cell size dynamics.
An ideal observation will record the size of individual cells along the cell cycle progression in timeseries measurements. The major difficulty with the growth measurement is having sufficient accuracy; at least 6% accuracy is needed in size measurement to clearly distinguish the different growth models [4]. The most accurate results have been reported by Tzur et al. [4] using the diameter of spherical cells, and by Godin et al. [5] using the buoyant mass. However, the cell growth is basically the creation of new biomass, the polymerization of small molecules, so the size measurement that depends on diameter or volume may be more artifactprone if cell density changes. The buoyant mass measurement by Godin et al. is more appropriate in that respect and quite accurate, but their technique requires the cells to flow back and forth within a microcantilever system, whose effect on cell growth is unknown yet. On the other hand, the optical measurement of dry mass is promising because it minimally perturbs the cell, and directly provides the dry mass, which is most closely related to the growth.
Dry mass is defined as the amount of nonaqueous content of the cell such as proteins and nucleic acids. The concentration of nonaqueous content is related with cell's refractive index by
, (1)
where is the refractive index of the medium and is the average specific refractive index increment for cell material [6]. Quantitative phase microscopy can be used to measure the retardation of wavefront , which is proportional to the integral of the concentration of nonaqueous content along the optical axis;
. (2)
The integral of quantitative phase over a cell's area is proportional to the dry mass, .
(3)
LBRC has developed a number of quantitative phase microscopy techniques with high spatial and temporal sensitivity to measure the dry mass of live cells. The lab first demonstrated cell growth measurement for extended time periods (~2hr) using the Fourier phase microscopy (FPM) [7]. Figure 1 shows timelapse measurements of the dry mass of HeLa cells. It can be seen that Cell 4 exhibited linear growth at a rate of 0.34 pg/min, while Cell 1 grew at a rate of 0.07 pg/min. In contrast, Cell 2 showed virtually no change in mass, whereas Cell 3 appeared to exhibit a slight oscillatory behavior, the origin of which is unclear. Such celltocell variation in growth dynamics has been very difficult to study because there is no other technique that can measure the individual cell's mass for live adherent cells. This unique capability of quantitative phase microscopy will open many new possibilities in cell growth research.
Fig. 1. A: dry mass density image of a monolayer of live HeLa cells obtained using Fourier phase microscopy. The color scale bar has units of pg/m2. 1–4, Cells 1–4. B: temporal evolution of the total dry mass content for each of the 4 representative cells shown in A. The solid lines for cells 1 and 4 indicate linear fits. Slopes (m) of the corresponding fits are shown, indicating more rapid growth for cell 4 compared with cell 1. In contrast, cell 2 was essentially static during these measurements, whereas cell 3 showed an oscillatory behavior of unknown origin.
Recently we have devised Lowcoherence Diffraction Phase Microscopy (LCDPM) that supersedes FPM for longterm time lapse studies of cellular dynamics. LCDPM is highly stable over extended period of time up to many days because it has the commonpath geometry for interferometry. As a result, LCDPM acquires quantitative phase images with hightransverse resolution and subnanometer pathlength stability over many hours. A collaborative study is underway with Professor Marc Kirschner, founding chair of the Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, to answer fundamental questions related to the cell growth cycle.
 Elliott SG, McLaughlin CS. Rate of macromolecularsynthesis through cellcycle of yeast saccharomycescerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 75, 43848 (1978). PMCID: PMC336119
 Jorgensen P, Tyers M. How cells coordinate growth and division. Current Biology. 14, R1014R27 (2004). PMID: 15589139
 Echave P, Conlon IJ, Lloyd AC. Cell size regulation in mammalian cells. Cell Cycle. 6, 21824 (2007). PMID: 17245129
 Tzur A, Kafri R, LeBleu VS, Lahav G, Kirschner MW. Cell growth and size homeostasis in proliferating animal cells. Science. 325, 16771 (2009). PMCID: PMC2905160
 Godin M, Delgado FF, Son SM, Grover WH, Bryan AK, Tzur A, Jorgensen P, Payer K, Grossman AD, Kirschner MW, Manalis SR. Using buoyant mass to measure the growth of single cells. Nat Methods. 7, 387U70. PMCID: PMC2862099
 Garnett JCM. Colours in metal glasses and in metallic films. Philos Trans R Soc Lond AContain Pap Math Phys Character. 203, 385420 (1904).
 Popescu G, Park Y, Lue N, BestPopescu C, Deflores L, Dasari RR, Feld MS, Badizadegan K. Optical imaging of cell mass and growth dynamics. Am J PhysiolCell Physiol. 295, C538C44 (2008). PMCID: PMC2518415

